Lucen wrote:It's entirely possible that he only means Zion. Zion has broken the truce, no further awakenings are to be allowed with the implication that he's still talking about Zion. It's in the machines' best interest that we continue to extract bluepills from the system so that its stability doesn't suffer.
Not trying to be disrespectful man, but quit arguing for the sake of arguing. He said it. That's your proof. There weren't any clauses or additions to that statement. Agent Gray said "Yes sir." and the conversation ended. End of story.
Let it go, man - the truth doesn't always bend to the machinists and maybe, JUST MAYBE, this little theory might be wrong.
Satta wrote:Pyraci wrote:
Satta wrote:
Pyraci wrote:
You can't separate peace from freedom because no one can be at peace unless he has his freedom.
- Malcolm X (1925 - 1965)
- Ezechiel
You quote Malcolm X and I quote Martin Luther King Jr. Just which one was for peace again?
If you do your history, my friend, you'll see that they both were. El Hajj Malik El-Shabazz (Malcolm X) fought and worked for peace, especially after his pilgrimage to Mecca. His viewpoints were just as necessary as any for African Americans to be treated as equal people and live in peace. That quote is an irrefutable truth.
((Like most of us here we all want peace, but we have different ways of getting there. I know my history, I am African American, and I even attended Morehouse College which is the same school as the one MLK went to. Martin promoted freedom through Peaceful means. Malcolm X promoted it through "Any means necessary." It wasn't until later in life for Malcolm that he started believing more in Martins way before he was assassinated. I have mad respect for both, but let me ask you a question? Just who signed the Civil Rights Bill and whose birthday does the Nation celebrate?))
P.S. Malcolm was promoting African Americans to arm themselves. Martin was saying the opposite. If I was alive during those times with my attitude, I would have been following Malcolm, but the correct path was Martin.
(I know, man. I'm African American too, and I happen to live in the "south". I'm no stranger to this. Note that I mentioned "after his pilgrimage to Mecca". Whether someone's birthday is a national holiday or not is irrelevant. There are many people in the last 400 years that fought to be equal with everyone else here in America that were forgotten. Malcolm X is just as much a part of the civil rights movement and just as significant to that part of our history as MLK, Rosa Parks, or anyone else.
When history is replayed without the existence of Malcolm X and we get to where we are today, then I'll believe that just one had the correct idea. Until then, as far as I'm concerned, the both of them held truths(although from different viewpoints) that were necessary. People in that time needed to know that they had a choice and that the shouldn't just back down. Many of his speeches gave people the motivation and the inspiration to keep going as they got beat, spit at, and broken. It wasn't because of the ideas of one of them, but all of them.
You've got to look at the whole picture, man. All of it was for a reason. Like I told Lucen, I know what I'm talking about.)
Niobe, you were thankful that Neo bought you two years. But if you'd abided by the truce, he could have bought you *forever*. Oh yeah, and a "truce" isn't permanent, regardless of what machinists want to believe. The fact that the sentinel army still sits, waiting outside of Zion is proof that this wasn't meant to be permanent. Hell, even when the Architect asked how long this was going to last, The Oracle said
"as long as it can." This was temporary and it was always intended to be. I believe it was Fen that said it in another thread, if they were interested in helping us and being friends with us, they could have offered to help us rebuild. They could have worked with us outside of the Matrix, heh.
It's not one-way in a trusting relationship, and it's NOT one-way when arguments get to this point. The Machine is no more innocent than man is. They do things because they fear us getting out of control. We do things because we fear their control. It's as simple as that. You can make excuses or justifications for them all you want, but the truth remains.
Either way, you lot aren't changing and we aren't either. Heh, nobody can question the original point I made about the human Iraq war, can they? I'll just let the proof speak for itself, then.
kthx,
- Ezechiel