Evaluation 8: location identification (complete)

22 posts · 2008-12-21 09:06:47 to 2009-01-06 03:48:25

#36300531077 12/21/2008 09:06:47 Evaluation 8: location identification (complete)

Evaluator:

In addition to combat skills, concealment skills, code manipulation and codebreaking, knowledge of the city is another trait of a skilled operative. Knowing your surroundings can save yourself and perhaps valuable time in a rough situation. The eighth test in this series looks at this in the form of identifying locations of images from the environment. Participants who can view an image and correctly identify the coordinates within a specified range will excel here. 

This evaluation will take place over five days, with two images given each day. A picture of a place in the city will be shown in each image, and the objective will be to be the first to respond with the correct coordinates corresponding to where the picture was taken. There will be no clues or hints provided, other than any you may pick up from any landmarks or buildings shown in the picture.

The "Y" coordinate does not have to be given. The coordinates do not have to be exact. There is a margin of error of 20 in each direction, and any coordinate given within that range will be accepted.

Example: If the correct coordinates are: X: 1,000  and Z: 500,

An answer of X: 980 and Z: 520 would be accepted.

An answer of X: 1,020 and Z: 490 would be accepted.

An answer of X: 1,016 and Z: 503 would be accepted. As long as the answer falls within the margin of error, 20 high or 20 low, it will be accepted.

TIP: Try to get as close as possible so that what you see matches the position in which the picture was taken. This should guarantee that your coordinates fall within the margin of error.

A correct answer awards 2 points for each image, with 10 images for a possible total of 20 points.

The images will be provided at 12:00 P.M. and 5:00 P.M. on each of the five days.

The current planned days are:

Dec. 28 - Dec. 30

Jan. 2nd and 3rd.

Check here for a revision to this schedule.

Very important, please make sure you understand: When you give your answer, you must also give your operative name in the Matrix. You can either give it along with your answer here, or you can send it in a private message to Merrit here, but please make sure you include it. I won't be able to assign you your points if you do not do this. One operative name per Data Node One ID, please. Although you can send your operative name privately, your coordinates must be given here in this broadcast message. Answers that are e-mailed to me in the Matrix will not be accepted, and answers that are sent in a private message will not be accepted.

Very important: Answers given in a message that has been edited will not be accepted! If you have to edit your answer, please make a new message! I will not be able to accept your answer if you do not do this.

I didn't participate in the other evaluations. Does that mean I can't participate in this one?

No. There are no restrictions on who can and cannot participate in each evaluation. You may participate in any or all of them.

Do I have to be in a specific organization to participate, or is this open to all redpills?

 The evaluations are open to everyone.

Do I have to be at a certain neurokinetic level to take part in this evaluation?

No.

Do I have to sign up on Data Node One to be eligible to participate?

No, but if you decide to attempt to give an answer, you must provide your operative name. See rules above for details.

How will the scoring system work in this evaluation?

Places are awarded based on number of total number of points earned in the test for giving correct answers first.

1st - 1200 points

2nd - 1000 points

3rd - 900 points

4th - 800 points

5th - 700 points

6th - 600 points

7th - 500 points

8th - 400 points

9th - 300 points

10th - 200 points

Will there be 75 points awarded to each person who participates?

No.


Please ask any additional questions here, to me directly in the Matrix, or through a private message here to Merrit on Data Node One. Thanks for your participation!

Standings:

8ayamos - 2

Omega02 - 12

Conrac - 6

#36300531078 12/21/2008 09:07:21 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 1:

Image 2:

Image 3:

Image 4:

Image 5:

#36300531080 12/21/2008 09:10:14 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 6:

Image 7:

Image 8:

Image 9:

Image 10:

#36300531131 12/21/2008 17:09:08 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Interesting... I might like to add to Include the neighborhood or district, the location is in, as there are 3 different coordinate system for each district except for the Westview/Richland districts sharing the same Coordinate system.

Edit: Add possible constructs map locations to this lists SMILEY


#36300532051 12/28/2008 12:00:11 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Evaluator:

The first image is now posted. Good luck!

#36300532053 12/28/2008 12:29:49 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

8ayamos

-321 153

#36300532054 12/28/2008 12:33:03 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

-321 -153 actually >_>

#36300532088 12/28/2008 17:00:22 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 2 is available.

#36300532110 12/28/2008 19:21:12 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Conrac

Lamar 500 -59

#36300532118 12/28/2008 19:38:15 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

548 -60

Omega02

Photobucket
#36300532143 12/28/2008 23:19:25 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Photo #1 was taken at coordinates X:-320; Z: -150 in Furihata.

Photo #2 was taken at coordinates X: 550; Z: -60 in Lamar.

Current standings have been added to the original message. Next image will be available at 12:00 P.M. on Dec. 29.

#36300532145 12/28/2008 23:28:03 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification
#36300532234 12/29/2008 12:04:32 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 3 available.

#36300532236 12/29/2008 12:11:22 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

-995 -360

Omega02

Photobucket
#36300532274 12/29/2008 17:01:41 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 3 was taken at X:-996; Z:-360 in Roger's Way.

Image 4 is available.

Scores updated.

#36300533167 01/03/2009 17:11:55 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Where is image 10?

Photobucket
#36300533168 01/03/2009 17:15:42 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Technical issue. Image 10 is available.

#36300533169 01/03/2009 17:18:46 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

-498 -5

Omega02

Photobucket
#36300533538 01/05/2009 17:41:09 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Image 8 was taken at X: -1601; Z: 689 in Creston Heights.

Image 9 was taken at X:79; Z:-8 in Mara.

Image 10 was taken at X:-499; Z:-5 in Stamos.

Scores updated.

#36300533539 01/05/2009 17:47:43 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification

Evaluator:

Completed. Thank you to all subjects who participated. See the overall totals for all evaluations to date here.

A 1-10th place final was not possible in this evaluation, but the results came to Omega02 with first place, Conrac in second, with 8ayamos taking third.

We are nearing the end of the evaluations. Information on the next test will be available soon.

#36300533595 01/06/2009 03:39:53 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification (complete)

Woot!  I knew I would win one of these eventually.

Photobucket
#36300533596 01/06/2009 03:48:25 Re:Evaluation 8: location identification (complete)

Good job! Looking forward to the next test, hopefully I can make it.