Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

165 posts · 2008-12-17 15:00:39 to 2009-01-22 03:48:47

#36300530450 12/18/2008 12:26:16 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I understand that the dev or devs are working on this issue to solve it for us, but what I dont understand is once the patch was finished and ready for the consumer did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

#36300530452 12/18/2008 12:33:06 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I'm totally impressed with the new white halls and construct area, also some of the new winter gear looks awesome

and I really want one of those gimp masks xD

#36300530453 12/18/2008 12:34:34 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Ic3b3rg wrote:

 did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

The files are fine and were tested on our test servers. It's deploying them to the Live server that seems to have hit a snag--ie, they don't seem to have arrived where they were supposed to go. And yes, it is very lame.

#36300530454 12/18/2008 12:34:46 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Ic3b3rg wrote:

I understand that the dev or devs are working on this issue to solve it for us, but what I dont understand is once the patch was finished and ready for the consumer did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

This isn't something that sort of testing would have captured.  We wish we could predict the future with our testing and know that a certain file would fail in the copying process when patching from one server to another before it ever happened.

#36300530456 12/18/2008 12:36:47 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

=D

#36300530458 12/18/2008 12:37:12 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Rarebit wrote:

Ic3b3rg wrote:

 did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

 And yes, it is very lame.

That's for sure...

#36300530462 12/18/2008 12:42:51 Re:Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

TonyJaa wrote:

Rarebit wrote:

Ic3b3rg wrote:

 did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

 And yes, it is very lame.

That's for sure...

#36300530463 12/18/2008 12:45:35 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Rarebit wrote:

Ic3b3rg wrote:

 did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

The files are fine and were tested on our test servers. It's deploying them to the Live server that seems to have hit a snag--ie, they don't seem to have arrived where they were supposed to go. And yes, it is very lame.

Ah, so the files are there, just miss-placed? So someone has to manually go into the folders I guess and locate the files and place them in the correct spots? No wonder its taking awhile.

#36300530464 12/18/2008 12:55:47 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Rarebit wrote:

TonyJaa wrote:

Rarebit wrote:

Ic3b3rg wrote:

 did they not go through and check the patch servers and the code to make sure it would download correctly by the normal launcher? Which is the most common method most of the players use btw.

 And yes, it is very lame.

That's for sure...

Oh come on,you said it first!

O_o

#36300530465 12/18/2008 13:01:08 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I am level 7. Do I have to have the see luggables equipt for some of the holiday events? If so where can I find that ability?

#36300530468 12/18/2008 13:14:53 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

mxo-live-en_US.local.cache

Without it it errors for me
<_<
>_>

Nevermind, it came back...

#36300530473 12/18/2008 13:19:52 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Nainie wrote:

I am level 7. Do I have to have the see luggables equipt for some of the holiday events? If so where can I find that ability?

There are some luggable Snowmen around which dispense snowballs. They flag you for pvp, I believe, when you pick them up, so unless you want suprise love taps from people your best bet is to find the static snowmen, there is a thread with their locations floating around somewhere.

So no you don't need the ability.

#36300530486 12/18/2008 13:40:13 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Still not working.

This is the sort of thing I'd loose my job over, backup before running updates and TEST THE INSTALL BEFORE RELEASE.

I understand the testing was done... but deployment needs to be tested too.

C'mon guys... srsly!

#36300530489 12/18/2008 13:42:50 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Agreed with phi on this.

#36300530497 12/18/2008 14:01:54 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

phi wrote:

Still not working.

This is the sort of thing I'd loose my job over, backup before running updates and TEST THE INSTALL BEFORE RELEASE.

I understand the testing was done... but deployment needs to be tested too.

C'mon guys... srsly!

I've never ever worked for a company that didn't boff something up now and again.  These sort of things happen, and it's usually because something that's always worked fine just plain didn't work this time.  Usually it's something that people suspect could never ever fail, and it gets overlooked.

I'm not saying it's right, and I agree that it sucks, but these things do happen.

#36300530502 12/18/2008 14:08:19 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

QuiDormit wrote:

I'm not saying it's right, and I agree that it sucks, but these things do happen.

agreed

#36300530507 12/18/2008 14:10:57 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

That's the moto for life everyone should have!

S**t happens!

#36300530521 12/18/2008 14:27:53 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Thank you Vinia!

Another question:

I dowloaded and installed the Beta launcher. Once this issue is fixed can I just uninstall the beta launcher and go back to my original launcher? I play this and EQII but do not like the beta launcher. I noticed I had to close the thing on my toolbar or it runs while playing the game?

#36300530525 12/18/2008 14:31:00 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

When they sort out the missing/corrupt files, you should be able to use your normal launchers again.

#36300530531 12/18/2008 14:39:32 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Maybe it's just me but... I got already  the station launcher on  my pc, but i use it only   for chat outside the game. Today after being aware of the issue with the launcher i run the SL, then i get the upgraded version and now my SL is updating from an hour to a 6%  dowload bar.... where is my fault? bad internet connection? Wrong country?....

I know there still time to play the new content, but i'm very glad if someone can help me...

#36300530546 12/18/2008 15:01:53 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Virrago wrote:

We wish we could predict the future with our testing and know that a certain file would fail in the copying process when patching from one server to another before it ever happened.

Well... why CAN'T you? I mean... I can predict the future! Maybe I should be a dev!

I swear, the incompetence... We pay $15 a month and we get no omnipotence?

#36300530551 12/18/2008 15:07:22 Re:Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

GodTier wrote:

Virrago wrote:

We wish we could predict the future with our testing and know that a certain file would fail in the copying process when patching from one server to another before it ever happened.

Well... why CAN'T you? I mean... I can predict the future! Maybe I should be a dev!

I swear, the incompetence... We pay $15 a month and we get no omnipotence?

heh... You made me LOL.

#36300530552 12/18/2008 15:09:33 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Oh really? Devs can dodge omnipotence.

#36300530555 12/18/2008 15:14:59 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Well at least in the history of this game this is only a very minor setback. Walrus takes the cake for those Assassin recaps coming out too soon and listing /afk when it actually wasn't added. SMILEY

#36300530559 12/18/2008 15:19:16 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

ZaneZavin wrote:

Well at least in the history of this game this is only a very minor setback. Walrus takes the cake for those Assassin recaps coming out too soon and listing /afk when it actually wasn't added.


We promised never to speak of this again.

#36300530564 12/18/2008 15:32:36 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

My launcher is fine now!

#36300530566 12/18/2008 15:34:21 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Indeed!

#36300530570 12/18/2008 15:44:20 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Same here Looks like we are good to go!

Yay Team!

#36300530571 12/18/2008 15:46:30 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Working for me now too SMILEY

#36300530573 12/18/2008 15:50:22 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Updating, thanks team.

#36300530576 12/18/2008 16:04:33 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Confirmed as working here too.

Thanks for getting it fixed so promptly, with the limited staff.

#36300530609 12/18/2008 18:23:27 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Looks like I got here well after the shenanigans but I'd still like to thank Virrago and Rarebit (and whoever else) for staying on top of things and keeping us all in the loop.  Good work guys :)

#36300530611 12/18/2008 18:33:29 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Yay! I got back from a Christmas party and found the patch glitch got fixed. Thanks, devs!!

#36300530664 12/18/2008 21:58:12 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Vesuveus wrote:

ArchDuke wrote:

Changes and Improvements

  • An item's mouseover information will now indicate if the item has purity or stability that never decays.

Good idea!  I'm pretty sure this only applies to the Fan Faire, Beta, Blue Sky, Burning Eye, and Security clothing, right?


Can we throw Awakening Glasses on that list? /crossfingers

And what have we found?

#36300530669 12/18/2008 22:03:19 Re:Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Rarebit wrote:

Vesuveus wrote:

ArchDuke wrote:

Changes and Improvements

  • An item's mouseover information will now indicate if the item has purity or stability that never decays.

Good idea!  I'm pretty sure this only applies to the Fan Faire, Beta, Blue Sky, Burning Eye, and Security clothing, right?


Can we throw Awakening Glasses on that list? /crossfingers

And what have we found?

Stability Can't Decay  SMILEY

/phormalcurtsey

#36300530673 12/18/2008 22:08:29 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

ArchDuke wrote:

Changes and Improvements

  • An item's mouseover information will now indicate if the item has purity or stability that never decays.

Good idea!  I'm pretty sure this only applies to the Fan Faire, Beta, Blue Sky, Burning Eye, and Security clothing, right?

Assassin's Mask, Awakening Glasses/Jacket, Anniversary Stuff (I think?)

#36300530685 12/18/2008 23:12:12 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

GodTier wrote:

ArchDuke wrote:

Changes and Improvements

  • An item's mouseover information will now indicate if the item has purity or stability that never decays.

Good idea!  I'm pretty sure this only applies to the Fan Faire, Beta, Blue Sky, Burning Eye, and Security clothing, right?

Assassin's Mask, Awakening Glasses/Jacket, Anniversary Stuff (I think?)

Yeah those too.  Also, all the org reward clothing Ch 1-4 and 5-8 (System Suit, Blood Noble Trench, etc.) which I didn't expect.

#36300530719 12/19/2008 06:31:26 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Back to the actual topic. Having resolved the yesterdays trouble with my Station Launcher, I was finally able to discover the Zion part of the 12.1 quest... And even if I still haven't finished the 12.1.3 mission (I guess it will take some time), I have to say now:

The 12.1 Zion quest is just awesome!

It's much better than I would ever expect it to be. Two thumbs up to Rare!

#36300530727 12/19/2008 08:11:37 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I have killed at least 10 level 55 override functions.  They have not dropped 1 shell for me.  am i killing the wrong npc's?

#36300530730 12/19/2008 08:15:31 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Iammagnus wrote:

I have killed at least 10 level 55 override functions.  They have not dropped 1 shell for me.  am i killing the wrong npc's?


I would like to know this also..was testing it myself..but my playtime is limited and I'm a bit puzzled

#36300530781 12/19/2008 12:25:14 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I just killed 2 override executable's level 55 and they did not drop anything.  We killed the lvl 60 lastnight and nothing.  What is going on here? 

#36300530847 12/19/2008 16:46:12 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Good update I guess, was kinda hoping for a white jayne half duster like ghosts to match everything.

#36300530875 12/19/2008 18:49:13 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Iammagnus wrote:

I just killed 2 override executable's level 55 and they did not drop anything.  We killed the lvl 60 lastnight and nothing.  What is going on here? 

You guys are doing it wrong. EDIT: Not giving you any help.

inb4 "IF I CAN'T GET CONTENT HANDED TO ME THEN F THIS S"

#36300530882 12/19/2008 19:27:42 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Nvm, figure it out yourself.

#36300530922 12/19/2008 22:47:20 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

I don't know what the "shells" are. I've spent a couple of hours searching South Vauxton for accelerated exile groups that have the particles needed to start Merovingian 12.1.2.

I found two groups, dropping particles 2 and 3. Can't find the groups dropping particles 1 and 4. Rooftops and inside buildings, no luck.

Particle 2 group  -2000  1  -822

Particle 3 group  -1243  1  -885

Pretty large area around both those coordinates that have those groups.

Anyone found the groups with 1 and 4 yet? If so, where?

#36300530924 12/19/2008 22:55:45 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

The white boots are sweet.  *What!?* SMILEY

#36300530963 12/20/2008 10:29:48 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Architects screens shuts down... launcher doesn't work... what's there not to understand, you do one thing it affects another... that's pretty simple, right? SMILEY

#36300530977 12/20/2008 11:31:36 Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

so, discussing update...

Haven't done all of the 12.1 yet, but I like what i see so far. Main thing that pleases me is that you don't have to run the mishes over and over to get the item for the next mission. Running it once, and then going to a neighborhood and battling/farming there FEELS more authentic to me, like the farming is actually part of the story. So kudos there, that had been my major beef wit the last series, trying to get the pens and bits just to trade em to do the next mish.

The 12.1 items look pretty good, don't like em all, and im sure there will be some "my org/sex/bodytype got gipped" type of complaints, but I gotta give em credit for trying.

On the Winter stuff, overall good except.... /facepalm.... now im gonna be the one whining about "my sex got gipped".

BATHROBES!?!?! /doublehandfacepalm

I wouldn't even say anything if men had also gotten them, and I see how this is kind of a reversal from last year (last year women got shirts, and men got outerwear, this year vice versa) but.... GAH!

As I WASN'T one of the women complaining about the loss of the pantless Gi's, and i never wore Gi's irregardless, I am dissapointed. My main grief here is that, as a "dress" for women, the robes cover up, or look cruddy with, everything else in the way of winter clothes. The new mens vests are AWESOME, can be used with all the other holiday gear, and will go well with lots of other clothes besides. The bathrobes will only be useful for when I've finished bathing in the simulation, which is, umm, never, or when i perform in a strip club, which is, umm, never... the collector blithely saying how "women seem to love em, even when they're not bathing " or some such only makes me want to throttle his sexist a**!!

I am an Operative. I wear clothing appropriate to being an Operative.

K done, had to say it... white boots and white stockings rock, as do the snowglobes, and this just means I will have to spend less time getting stuff.

#36300531068 12/21/2008 06:20:24 Re:Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

GodTier wrote:

Iammagnus wrote:

I just killed 2 override executable's level 55 and they did not drop anything. We killed the lvl 60 lastnight and nothing. What is going on here?

You guys are doing it wrong. EDIT: Not giving you any help.

inb4 "IF I CAN'T GET CONTENT HANDED TO ME THEN F THIS S"

Some people have lives, just putting it out there.

#36300531069 12/21/2008 06:34:07 Re:Re:Update 65 / Winter Holiday Discussion - December 18, 2008

Iammagnus wrote:

I have killed at least 10 level 55 override functions.  They have not dropped 1 shell for me.  am i killing the wrong npc's?

 Only one that drops the Override Kernel(Ops) is the Level 70 Override Executable.