the female gi

114 posts · 2008-05-15 16:51:06 to 2008-07-18 13:02:15

#36300455663 05/16/2008 02:23:03 Re:the female gi
KanoR wrote:
I was previously unaware that posting on forums was such serious business that two fellow posters could not joke around.


Welcome to DN1

But I do see Pylats point, all people have said it "YOO LYK 2 CYBORZ!", I dont know about you but I know if I see a pair of digital legs, I think I can hold myself together.  Its all just enforcing the point that there is no real reason that anyone can think of that qualifys the change.

And yes, the odd person will like the new style, but what about all the people that liked it before hand?  Obviously we are just here to make up the numbers because no one actually cares about what we think.

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300455664 05/16/2008 02:24:51 Re:the female gi
SolidRevolver wrote:
Obviously we are just here to make up the numbers because no one actually cares about what we think.

Yeah, exactly.
#36300455687 05/16/2008 05:31:37 Re:the female gi
KanoR wrote:
Oh, you see.  I was previously unaware that posting on forums was such serious business that two fellow posters could not joke around.  Thank you for your information, Pylat - as I now know what when posting I must use the utmost sincerity.  Otherwise, who knows, people might have fun!
There is a time and a place for both. This thread was made for the discussion of the new Gi models, not to try poke fun at players and derail the thread unnecessarily.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455688 05/16/2008 05:36:07 Re:the female gi
SolidRevolver wrote:
Obviously we are just here to make up the numbers because no one actually cares about what we think.


Welcome to the Real.

Nobody here cares because we're all customers just like everyone else.  No one wants to hear complaints when they're perfectly satisfied themselves.  That's just human nature. 

It's like going to your favorite restaurant and sitting next to the guy who is perpetually griping about his over-cooked steak to the other patrons.  All you want him to do is shut up and leave, if he's so unhappy, so you can enjoy your meal without his ranting.

I digress.

Despite the objection of your peers, you should feel free to voice your opinions on things.  We may not care but I'm sure the "powers that be" do care.  I'm positive that many of the heated debates carried out on these forums over the years has helped forge the game.

Changes may not always take place but they all began with a gripe, imo.

BTW:  I actually do like the new Gi model.  I never wore them before because I hated them being pantless.  I appreciated the nod towards Final Flight but they were horrible looking.  I might actually wear them now.  SMILEY

#36300455689 05/16/2008 05:47:23 Re:the female gi
Yeah but the pants add at least 20 pounds to your hips and thighs.

Why not have those pants as a Legging model (As has been suggested) then you can even accessorise them with all the miniskirts you wear so you can even maintain your dignity when PvPing in them.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455691 05/16/2008 05:52:56 Re:the female gi
change somethign dont change somthin either way your always see complaints, how about putting the trouserless version on a collector in international in a choice of colours to apease everyone who likes the old style.

#36300455692 05/16/2008 05:57:28 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Interesting that most people who want to keep the Gi's with pants can only flame and flamebait and throw temper tantrums. Valid points only please.

From ALL the people I have talked to in game ONE PERSON liked the new Gi's, just have both models, or add a new stocking type as was suggested. Then people can wear the "Pants" with their miniskirts to cover themselves up.

Sorry if I sounded like I was going off half-cocked earier, but I'll admit, the gi's were a bit of a flashpoint for me when it comes to clothing styles.
#36300455693 05/16/2008 06:19:53 Re:the female gi
I'm mad about the gi change because I'm a pervert.  SMILEY
#36300455695 05/16/2008 06:29:35 Re:the female gi
I was kinda like "why are they complainging about 1 item" but if your an actual female player playing a female character I can understand why you would be upset.  But if your a dood, well i'll stop there.
#36300455697 05/16/2008 06:35:14 Re:the female gi
MatrixRefugee wrote:
Pylat wrote:
Interesting that most people who want to keep the Gi's with pants can only flame and flamebait and throw temper tantrums. Valid points only please.

From ALL the people I have talked to in game ONE PERSON liked the new Gi's, just have both models, or add a new stocking type as was suggested. Then people can wear the "Pants" with their miniskirts to cover themselves up.

Sorry if I sounded like I was going off half-cocked earier, but I'll admit, the gi's were a bit of a flashpoint for me when it comes to clothing styles.
Actually when I made that post you were the last person on my mind that my comment would apply to.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455702 05/16/2008 06:50:56 Re:the female gi
I used to PVP in my red gi all the time, but don't want to anymore.  :( It doesn't look as pretty, really. 
#36300455703 05/16/2008 06:52:16 Re:the female gi
Garu wrote:

Despite the objection of your peers, you should feel free to voice your opinions on things.  We may not care but I'm sure the "powers that be" do care.


It doesn't look like that thought, a half joke about getting pants on them and *whoosh* done and ready for patch.  No indication he was truly serious about doing it seeing as he made a pink Gi for the occasion aswell as a new Tattoo, it could have been added to the thread with the other stuff planned for Update 60, see what everyone else thought.

I am not saying Rarebit is doing a bad job, but he isn't a god and he makes mistakes and I think it is a mistake to not give the part of the community that actually liked the Gi as it was a chance to say why it shouldn't be changed.

I like the Legging idea, that way if they were ever to release the MA Gi, people could still use their normal MA pants and then they can put on the Gi Pant/Leggings if they wish.  It also leaves the colour matching search for normal Gis.

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300455704 05/16/2008 06:52:24 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Why not have those pants as a Legging model (As has been suggested) then you can even accessorise them with all the miniskirts you wear so you can even maintain your dignity when PvPing in them.


This change to the model doesn't really affect me one way or another, but it seems arbitrary and unnecessary. Females already have the "tunic and pants" dress set, so we don't exactly need the Gi look to give us a martial-arts feel. Furthermore, I notice nothing was really done about the cleavage of the gi, so this really doesn't deskankify it, and frankly it wasn't the most revealing piece of clothing either. The shiny backless body suits and miniskirts seem worse.

If you want to make clothing changes, how about getting rid of some of those disgusting rocawear models?

Pylat's got the best suggestion I've seen in years. YES, the pants should be something to go in the leggings slot, not physically attached to the Gi.

#36300455716 05/16/2008 08:08:51 Re:the female gi
How many of you actually have a female rsi?


#36300455719 05/16/2008 08:19:21 Re:the female gi
Aquilae wrote:
How many of you actually have a female rsi?


You'll find those stats are very accurate ^_^

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300455722 05/16/2008 08:25:16 Re:the female gi

lol

i will like 2 remind everyone once again, this game is called "the matrix online" based on a trilogy that was rated r for violent content, sexual content and language. now having said that; we should not be talking about changing or getting rid of ANYTHING!

the game is supposed to be sexy

the game is supposed to be gothic

the game is supposed to be cyberpunk

if anything, we need more sexier clothing, more gothic situations, and more more more cyber punk in this game.

watch the matrix movies, watch the animatrix short films, read the 2 graphic novels and ask urself; if there is anything, anything at all that u didnt like about any of it. then i ask u; why are u in this game?

im becoming annoyed with people who think the gi was silly, too revealing or whatever. it is in the films as it was depicted in the game

it should be changed back asap, if u dont like it, get over it.

#36300455724 05/16/2008 08:29:50 Re:the female gi
*that wasn't very nice*
#36300455728 05/16/2008 08:41:54 Re:the female gi

flame me lol; whatev!

what a silly notion?

i started this post so that people can respond to a situation that doesnt make much sense to me. i have seen that a lot of people agree with me and soo what is a point that ur trying to make?

ahhhh

i see

well i will ignore u now because u will probably keep posting something without saying anything at all

maybe attack me with words now?

or suddenly create a dialogue that makes sense?

too late, u have had ur time, the future is our time now : P

#36300455730 05/16/2008 08:43:52 Re:the female gi
nexus2revolution wrote:

flame me lol; whatev!

what a silly notion?

i started this post so that people can respond to a situation that doesnt make much sense to me. i have seen that a lot of people agree with me and soo what is a point that ur trying to make?

ahhhh

i see

well i will ignore u now because u will probably keep posting something without saying anything at all

maybe attack me with words now?

or suddenly create a dialogue that makes sense?

too late, u have had ur time, the future is our time now : P

What a horrible future, I so pray for mankind.
#36300455731 05/16/2008 08:44:13 Re:the female gi
Iviera wrote:
Pylat's got the best suggestion I've seen in years. YES, the pants should be something to go in the leggings slot, not physically attached to the Gi.
Well it wasn't actually my idea, so I take no credit for coming up with it originally. But I certainly think it is the best solution that will appease all people involved.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455732 05/16/2008 08:52:24 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Iviera wrote:
Pylat's got the best suggestion I've seen in years. YES, the pants should be something to go in the leggings slot, not physically attached to the Gi.
Well it wasn't actually my idea, so I take no credit for coming up with it originally. But I certainly think it is the best solution that will appease all people involved.
Not to jump the gun here, but if that were possible wouldn't we................. have that already?
#36300455734 05/16/2008 08:54:05 Re:the female gi
Well I've never seen it suggested before so.... no.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455736 05/16/2008 08:55:26 Re:the female gi
Aquilae wrote:
How many of you actually have a female rsi?
How many of you are actually female, and therefore, have any right to feel that it "makes you look objectified" or whatever?

/end
#36300455737 05/16/2008 08:58:09 Re:the female gi
No offense, but if you want to pull that excuse out I'm going to complain that men are overlooked cause we only have 7 clothing slots and can't wear boxers despite there being constant requests for them.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455740 05/16/2008 09:04:34 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
No offense, but if you want to pull that excuse out I'm going to complain that men are overlooked cause we only have 7 clothing slots and can't wear boxers despite there being constant requests for them.
I agree with you, so.... yeah.  Go ahead.

And if  you'd read, I'm pulling the Uterus Card in FAVOR of the old gi, because I own a gi that short.  When fighting, I wear workout shorts under it (they're a lot like biking shots, or sliding shorts)  Also, I know this will blow your minds, but panties and a bikini cover the same area (I KNOW AMIRITE WOW!).  Fear of being seen in your underwear is a bizarre societal construct, seeing as we walk on the beach all the time in even less.
#36300455742 05/16/2008 09:05:43 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Well I've never seen it suggested before so.... no.
Game Mechanics > Suggestions
#36300455743 05/16/2008 09:07:29 Re:the female gi
I prefer them now.
#36300455744 05/16/2008 09:08:48 Re:the female gi
I've already posted (But not my idea, but it's the best one I have seen) a solution to this that seems to be fair for all parties involved. Instead of dismissing people quite rudely how about you explain why that idea shouldn't be implemented?

EDIT: Oops, ignore that first part, misread something.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455750 05/16/2008 09:15:28 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
I've already posted (But not my idea, but it's the best one I have seen) a solution to this that seems to be fair for all parties involved. Instead of dismissing people quite rudely how about you explain why that idea shouldn't be implemented?
I never said anything of the sort. I'm perfectly fine with no pants on my RSI. I didn't like how the gi's look, so I didn't wear them. I jokingly make a suggestion to Rarebit, and he likes it. End of that. He could have gone about it about 13 ways, but he chose just to add pants.

Maybe this was the only way TO add pants to the Gi's.

Please don't jump to conclusions by what I say. It makes you seem stupid in my eyes.
#36300455753 05/16/2008 09:18:52 Re:the female gi
Perhaps that is the main problem people have. A joking suggestion was implemented despite most players not liking it. Why fix something that ain't broke?
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455755 05/16/2008 09:20:28 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Perhaps that is the main problem people have. A joking suggestion was implemented despite most players not liking it. Why fix something that ain't broke?
You assume again with the most. The real estimate is about half and half. I'm going to work now.
#36300455756 05/16/2008 09:23:14 Re:the female gi
Forum numbers seem about half and half, but even Rarebit admits that isn't a good judge of real numbers.

In game, like I said, only met ONE person who likes the new Gi.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455759 05/16/2008 09:27:58 Re:the female gi
Chemuel wrote:
Pylat wrote:
No offense, but if you want to pull that excuse out I'm going to complain that men are overlooked cause we only have 7 clothing slots and can't wear boxers despite there being constant requests for them.
I agree with you, so.... yeah.  Go ahead.

And if  you'd read, I'm pulling the Uterus Card in FAVOR of the old gi, because I own a gi that short.  When fighting, I wear workout shorts under it (they're a lot like biking shots, or sliding shorts)  Also, I know this will blow your minds, but panties and a bikini cover the same area (I KNOW AMIRITE WOW!).  Fear of being seen in your underwear is a bizarre societal construct, seeing as we walk on the beach all the time in even less.

OH man I'm fapping so hard right now...
#36300455760 05/16/2008 09:28:52 Re:the female gi
That leggings idea sounds like it would work well, problem is the limited space on the database and separating the pants from the Gi would mean pretty much doubling the amount of space a Gi set takes up, which is worse than having half the Gi's panted and the other half pantless.

In my opinion, the panted Gi's look a lot more realistic as a MA piece of clothing, I've seen quite a few real life MA tournaments and both female and males wore bottoms along with the top.

In FFOTO, it was meant as a sexy scene, they were both flirting with each other in a training construct, it would have been a lot less sexy for the viewer if she had pants on. Plus she had underwear on not to mention they had swords but the original developers didn't see fit to acknowledge those parts.

If the Female Gi gets the pants removed then I call for the Male Gi to have it's pants removed, fair is fair. I, for one, like the Gi. I didn't call for it to be changed but saw the image Rarebit produced and liked it, and in my opinion it looks far better as a proper MA item than the tunics.

The movies may have had a R rating (15 in the UK) but the game can and probably is played by even younger. I'm no prude, the top half of it looks nice (apart from a few clipping issues) but it looks a lot better now, imo.
#36300455762 05/16/2008 09:33:44 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
That leggings idea sounds like it would work well, problem is the limited space on the database

Not really a valid point considering we just added +300 weapons to the game. The space isn't really an issue.

And that's right. Boxers slot should totally be added to the Male RSI.

EQUALITY!

JUSTICE FOR ALL!
#36300455763 05/16/2008 09:36:12 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
If the Female Gi gets the pants removed then I call for the Male Gi to have it's pants removed, fair is fair.
So why haven't males got our boxers yet? You can keep your pants but lose leggings (Fair's fair, you have an extra clothing slot).

Or we can get our boxers (Fair's fair, we have one less clothing slot).

I'd happily lose the pants off the Male Gi if it meant I could wear boxers. Tiger Masters Gi with Heart patterned boxers would be the pwn.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455764 05/16/2008 09:38:31 Re:the female gi
Mave wrote:
Vinia wrote:
That leggings idea sounds like it would work well, problem is the limited space on the database

Not really a valid point considering we just added +300 weapons to the game. The space isn't really an issue.
Having level 50 guns benefits all players using guns of which only mostly lvl 45 guns were available thus (I guess) were losing out on the base damage that the other tree's had, therefore not a waste of database space. Duplicating clothing just because some people dislike the looks is a waste imo.
#36300455765 05/16/2008 09:38:55 Re:the female gi
nexus2revolution wrote:

watch the matrix movies, watch the animatrix short films, read the 2 graphic novels and ask urself; if there is anything, anything at all that u didnt like about any of it. then i ask u; why are u in this game?


There are a lot of things I don't like about the source material. If you're seriously looking for an answer to that question, I think ninety percent of the people here will say the same thing - we love the game for the game. MxO is not the same as the movies or anything else in the setting, but it has its own charm and appeal.

The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on.

#36300455766 05/16/2008 09:40:33 Re:the female gi
The database is limited on different types of clothing. Can't make jeans but they're able to re-texture current pants models to look like jeans.


#36300455769 05/16/2008 09:42:48 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Vinia wrote:
If the Female Gi gets the pants removed then I call for the Male Gi to have it's pants removed, fair is fair.
So why haven't males got our boxers yet? You can keep your pants but lose leggings (Fair's fair, you have an extra clothing slot).

Or we can get our boxers (Fair's fair, we have one less clothing slot).

I'd happily lose the pants off the Male Gi if it meant I could wear boxers. Tiger Masters Gi with Heart patterned boxers would be the pwn.
Blame whoever coded the clothing slots, I'd campaign just as hard for a slot like that for the guys. The reasoning that I got from the legging slot is because of clothing items that reveal the legs. What item of male clothing would show the boxers off when worn? The only time they'd be seen is when stripped down to them.
#36300455771 05/16/2008 09:44:27 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
Having level 50 guns benefits all players using guns of which only mostly lvl 45 guns were available thus (I guess) were losing out on the base damage that the other tree's had, therefore not a waste of database space. Duplicating clothing just because some people dislike the looks is a waste imo.
If it results in pleasing all the players and increasing the overall happiness of the player base then I think it is most certainly worth it.

It's the little things that people appreciate the most.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455775 05/16/2008 09:50:19 Re:the female gi
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on.
Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?

Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
#36300455780 05/16/2008 09:53:15 Re:the female gi
Pylat wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Having level 50 guns benefits all players using guns of which only mostly lvl 45 guns were available thus (I guess) were losing out on the base damage that the other tree's had, therefore not a waste of database space. Duplicating clothing just because some people dislike the looks is a waste imo.
If it results in pleasing all the players and increasing the overall happiness of the player base then I think it is most certainly worth it.

It's the little things that people appreciate the most.
Which in turn could possibly reduce space for future clothing that people may want or that Dev's may want to add and decrease the overall happiness of the player base. Swings and roundabouts.
#36300455782 05/16/2008 10:03:51 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on.
Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?

Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.


Based on the argument that (even though it was a private training construct) the pantsless Gi was seen in Matrix source material and the new "with-pants" Gi was not.

But, again, the Matrixiness or lackthereof really isn't the greater issue.

#36300455786 05/16/2008 10:07:43 Re:the female gi
Iviera wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?

Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.


Based on the argument that (even though it was a private training construct) the pantsless Gi was seen in Matrix source material and the new "with-pants" Gi was not.

But, again, the Matrixiness or lackthereof really isn't the greater issue.

Again, Rocawear wasn't in the source material, I don't recall tiny, tiny miniskirts either, but they are in it. MxO is based on the movies and carries them forward but it is not strictly bound by the styles seen in the movies or animations or comics.
#36300455788 05/16/2008 10:16:50 Re:the female gi
Iviera wrote:
MxO is not the same as the movies or anything else in the setting, but it has its own charm and appeal.
Apparently I agree with you. SMILEY
#36300455789 05/16/2008 10:17:36 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
Iviera wrote:
The fact that changing the Gi is making the game less sexy and less "Matrixy", while true, is not much of an argument. However, making an item less appealing to a large part of the player base with no apparent reason is. And that's what we should really be focusing on.
Actually I'd like to know where a piece of clothing like the old Gi was worn inside the simulation and not a training construct with one other person in it who was being flirted with?

Leather, rubber, shades, pvc are all 'matrixy' items like Rocawear etc... aren't but they are still in the game. I don't see how having pants on a Gi, as Gi's do, makes it 'less Matrixy'.
I don't see when people wore gi at all outside the dojo in any of the movies etc. Gi's are not suppsoed to be used to go out and have fun, they are for fighting and womens gi's didn't have pants since they are more comfortable for fighting like that. Then again in todays dojos women have pants on their gis so I dunno...
#36300455791 05/16/2008 10:22:08 Re:the female gi
The Leo wrote:
I don't see when people wore gi at all outside the dojo in any of the movies etc. Gi's are not suppsoed to be used to go out and have fun, they are for fighting and womens gi's didn't have pants since they are more comfortable for fighting like that. Then again in todays dojos women have pants on their gis so I dunno...
Well precisely, Gi's are a Dojo clothing item and yes women do wear pants for decency in them. But the game, as in life, doesn't restrict the wearing of them outside of the Dojo. Women's Gi's may not have had pants in the past but they, in all likelihood, would have been longer and the woman would have worn something underneath.
#36300455797 05/16/2008 10:28:46 Re:the female gi
Vinia wrote:
Women's Gi's may not have had pants in the past but they, in all likelihood, would have been longer and the woman would have worn something underneath.

Chemuel wrote:
And if  you'd read, I'm pulling the Uterus Card in FAVOR of the old gi, because I own a gi that short.  When fighting, I wear workout shorts under it (they're a lot like biking shots, or sliding shorts)  Also, I know this will blow your minds, but panties and a bikini cover the same area (I KNOW AMIRITE WOW!).  Fear of being seen in your underwear is a bizarre societal construct, seeing as we walk on the beach all the time in even less.
 And to add on the dignity card, Ashencourte Leggings (green miniskirt) has Melee buffs encouragingyou to go out and hit Side Kicks with, so current logic dictates that pants should be added to the miniskirt too.
Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300455800 05/16/2008 10:33:45 Re:the female gi
SolidRevolver wrote:
And to add on the dignity card, Ashencourte Leggings (green miniskirt) has Melee buffs encouragingyou to go out and hit Side Kicks with, so current logic dictates that pants should be added to the miniskirt too.
To be honest I've always preferred to have at least some visible underwear when wearing those skirts, it's like the base underwear a female rsi has just disappears when putting on a skirt etc... It may even be more provocative as at the moment people can see there's nothing, putting underwear on tells the brain that there is something to hide underneath...
Chemuel shows the point brilliantly with her argument, she wears something under her Gi, there was nothing under the Old Gi...

Oh dear... does that make me sound like a perv?