Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

150 posts · 2008-05-14 15:50:06 to 2008-06-11 13:46:21

#36300455235 05/15/2008 07:15:32 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

This update is outstanding. Excellent work.

That is all.

#36300455240 05/15/2008 07:27:24 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:
a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.
#36300455247 05/15/2008 07:39:40 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008





Update 60 downgrades "Cyberz" - 100pts



#36300455257 05/15/2008 07:50:19 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
Mindsweep wrote:

lol about the GI discussion. Come on, there are many other new stuff in this update then just the GI pants, witch i think is about time they came. We need Male Ninja mask!!!


Couldn't care less about the new stuff if it means taking away things I already liked.  To use another Metaphor, "We are adding a new construct, but we are deleting Sakura"

I know for a fact I would have used Pantless Gis a lot more than a face mask that currently goes with nothing.

EDIT: It is also the thought behind it too.  It was brought up as a half joke and by the time 2 or 3 people aggreed, it was changed.  Yet there is a massive long thrad about how those Agent spawns are annoying yet there is not even a comprimise.

I think you people are blowing this vastly out of proportion, it's frankly getting annoying. And, to the bold above, the pants probably took Rarebit what, 10 seconds? Changing how an NPC works is a vastly different story. Perhaps he's working on it, and you're just looking for an excuse to complain.


#36300455265 05/15/2008 07:59:00 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SMILEY   Thank you for the new guns!
#36300455267 05/15/2008 08:01:19 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Now the females know how I, and some other males, felt when the shine was changed on several of the male long coats and ruined them for some.
#36300455269 05/15/2008 08:03:42 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
TheShickle wrote:
...a flirtation device

Ooh can I buy one of these at an Item Vendor?
#36300455272 05/15/2008 08:13:13 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

If you do nothing else today, visit Doc Martin and Binary Boy.  SSR Gear and 10 Fingers FTW!!!

I am very pleased I have a character in the 31-35 range today.....although I am a bit concerned about Binary's location in Creston.  Those Neighborhood Watch clowns still aggro my 50, which doesn't bother me, but will hurt my 35.  Maybe he can be moved away a little out of aggro range.

#36300455273 05/15/2008 08:13:30 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

(Double post)

#36300455278 05/15/2008 08:17:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The_Big_V wrote:

I am very pleased I have a character in the 31-35 range today.....although I am a bit concerned about Binary's location in Creston.  Those Neighborhood Watch clowns still aggro my 50, which doesn't bother me, but will hurt my 35.  Maybe he can be moved away a little out of aggro range.

Im pretty sure its possible to trade with im and not get killed... with careful timing that is SMILEY
#36300455282 05/15/2008 08:21:39 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Roukan wrote:
I think you people are blowing this vastly out of proportion, it's frankly getting annoying. And, to the bold above, the pants probably took Rarebit what, 10 seconds? Changing how an NPC works is a vastly different story. Perhaps he's working on it, and you're just looking for an excuse to complain.


I complain if I dont agree, not for the fun of complaining.  And those Agents have been there nearly a year now, and he has already edited them to make them friendly to Machs.  And I used that Gi a lot, so I feel strongly when it is taken away without a real reason and when a good few other people in this thread have also disaggreed with the change.

It seems that a lot of content in MxO has come round to annoy half of the community to cheer the other half up.

#36300455288 05/15/2008 08:41:47 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
I don't think archived mishs drop the new guns. Lvl 50+ NPCs altogether shud have changed the lvl 45 gun drops to lvl 50 enhanced... and I am yet to see a drop of them.
#36300455290 05/15/2008 08:52:48 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
It seems that a lot of content in MxO has come round to annoy half of the community to cheer the other half up.

Actually I think the ratio is more 70:30, that is, only 30% enjoy the new content.
#36300455292 05/15/2008 09:01:05 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
Roukan wrote:
I think you people are blowing this vastly out of proportion, it's frankly getting annoying. And, to the bold above, the pants probably took Rarebit what, 10 seconds? Changing how an NPC works is a vastly different story. Perhaps he's working on it, and you're just looking for an excuse to complain.


I complain if I dont agree, not for the fun of complaining.  And those Agents have been there nearly a year now, and he has already edited them to make them friendly to Machs.  And I used that Gi a lot, so I feel strongly when it is taken away without a real reason and when a good few other people in this thread have also disaggreed with the change.

It seems that a lot of content in MxO has come round to annoy half of the community to cheer the other half up.

Because few other people also want it gone. In the end, it's Rarebit's decision on -anything-. We ALL get *CENSORED* in this game at one point, I've just learnt to deal with it.
#36300455293 05/15/2008 09:05:44 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:

It seems that a lot of content in MxO has come round to annoy half of the community to cheer the other half up.

You can't please everyone.  There's always someone here to complain about something.  I guess that's the balance of the community.  It's usually the same crowd so really there's no surprise anymore.

#36300455295 05/15/2008 09:16:55 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
I wouldn't have minded if they added another Gi which had pants, but they didn't, they replaced something which is a different story.  But far be it from me to voice my oponion, I mean I only pay a subscription.
#36300455297 05/15/2008 09:22:00 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The difference is. This isn't the devs refusing a change that some people want.

This is them actively changing something that people seemed content with (In all my discussions with people in game I met ONE person who likes the new Gi's) to something that they positively hate. We were happy with what we had and that was taken away. And to please what seems like a small minority, we have to question why it was done.
#36300455301 05/15/2008 09:32:04 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
I wouldn't have minded if they added another Gi which had pants, but they didn't, they replaced something which is a different story.  But far be it from me to voice my oponion, I mean I only pay a subscription.

Well I guess I'm indifferent because I don't like Gis to begin with.  They' cool in a dojo but that's where it ends for me.  I'd much rather have an existing item, I don't wear, changed (for better or worse) than take up database space and prevent us from getting clothing that I may really want to wear in the future.

The lesser of two evils, imo.

#36300455302 05/15/2008 09:32:35 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Still some clipping on the Gi's bra and the pants could have done with some flaring at the bottom like the males version but I like it.  I must admit having a seperate pantless Gi for all those that... well, liked it like that for their own reasons, would have kept Drama to the minimum but I agree with Garu, it'd be a waste of database space. However, it looks like a proper item of female MA clothing now. Shame about the Tiger Coat but female MA's can wear it underneath the Gi anyway...
#36300455303 05/15/2008 09:32:43 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/


*please watch the inappropriate language - virrago*

#36300455306 05/15/2008 09:35:08 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
 
#36300455315 05/15/2008 10:13:19 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/


*please watch the inappropriate language - virrago*

Reply to "Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008"
Sorry for dicussing part of the update.
#36300455323 05/15/2008 10:33:36 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
#36300455337 05/15/2008 11:38:10 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
I want my pants less Gi's back!
#36300455341 05/15/2008 11:50:22 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Nevermind.

#36300455349 05/15/2008 12:20:49 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

It's a fine update.  Always nice to have new stuff every update.  I don't know why people are blowing a head gasket over the Gis.  It's not exactly a surprise, I remember seeing a pic of the new pants-ed Gi from Rare somewhere.  Don't remember exactly where.  I don't recall a big uproar then. 

#36300455351 05/15/2008 12:25:20 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The_Big_V wrote:

I don't know why people are blowing a head gasket over the Gis.  It's not exactly a surprise, I remember seeing a pic of the new pants-ed Gi from Rare somewhere.  Don't remember exactly where.  I don't recall a big uproar then. 


It was in the Assorted Dev Screen shots, and probably like most we thought it was a joke until he actually went ahead with it.
#36300455354 05/15/2008 12:32:50 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Ok... I promise not to whine, but I have say one more thing about the Gi.  Phor me, personally, I don't like the addition of pants to it.  I was wearing my blue (teal) Gi when I hit level 50, a LONG time ago.  I consider it my most valued momento or keepsake in MxO.  I even said so in my Op profile:

  Do you have an item you no longer use but keep around for nostalgic reasons? If so what is it and why do you keep it?    "I thought long and hard about this and it's actually a piece of clothing anyone can get. It's the Teal and Black Gi I was wearing when I leveled to 50."

So, yeah... I'm not too happy about the Gi change.  I do like all the other additions, and I really like that they've cleaned up the colors on the Gi.  But I sure will miss the version without the pants.  I also pheel that it was originally designed around the Orisis phlick too... it's just a shame.  (I'll shut up now, just wanted to say how I really phelt about it) SMILEY

#36300455360 05/15/2008 12:59:02 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
If my female alt is able to somehow aquire Lo Remnah's robe at some point then I will be /veryhappy.
#36300455368 05/15/2008 13:35:22 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Good stuff. I was already looking forward to the gun models but some of the "new" clothing has me interested.  I really was expecting a tad more MA wise but who knows maybe there's something down the road. 

Any additions to missions such as the Crit rewards is always good news.  Honestly I still think the bulk of the game revolves around the mission system and any new content there really helps.   But I still think the mission system in general needs more work then anything else. Its a tool that provides EXP for leveling, Info, Moves the story along, provides drops and encourages group play which I think is critical for keeping MMO interests up (rather then Farming and Player v Player combat). There's probably quite a bit more that missions could offer. If the rewards is the start for more attention for the mission system I think thats a good sign. 

 ...as for the Gi, I don't think I even  remember seeing the post complaining about it.  I've seen posts for Agent Spawns, Org Weapons (which I'm still holding my breath for), and Red Heart Boxers no Gi complaints. Seems like a odd change. Couldn't they have just added a new Stocking model for the pants? Those would've shown with the Gi anyway and less people would have to change their wardrobes. Doesn't really effect me though, but if they do end up having two Gis for females I'm gonna make a request for the Cut-sleeve Gi for the Gents. SMILEY

P.S I assume Liaisons got their spawn tools? Yes/No?

#36300455378 05/15/2008 14:12:55 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

i think it was wrong to give the female gi pants. it is an exclusive article of clothing that mxo has. break out ur dvd's and watch the animatrix.

for people who complained that it too short, too revealing, too sexy; whatever? gett a life, it makes me sick to hear people complain and push their high moral ideas unto the devs in an attempt to get them to change something they dont like. especially since it has been around for soo long.

whats next?

get rid of sexy mood, sultry mood, drunk mood, drink bottle, cake, certain dresses, the dances, tatoos

mmmmm

most females are already in game protesting the gi by walking around naked

what happens now; get rid of nakedness?

lol

#36300455405 05/15/2008 15:20:04 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
#36300455412 05/15/2008 15:30:24 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
#36300455415 05/15/2008 15:38:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
#36300455417 05/15/2008 15:41:36 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
It was an unnecessary change that he took upon himself to change, and Im getting tired of things getting changed when they dont need to be.
#36300455423 05/15/2008 15:53:30 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:
Go Play WoW and ride off into the sunset on a friggin fairy horse


I will enjoy the guns when I find some (Havent yet), I will enjoy the SSR Clothing when I get a chance to farm them (darn being unable to farm the 45 Earpiece or get anywhere near the 70 Earpiece from the ocean of Machs on the Helipad), I have already gotten 2 IS Boosters which I will use when I have a reason to.  But until I get round to that content, I will discuss the content change I have seen, the female Gi.

Unnecessary, lost its Gi-look with tight-ish pants and a lot more of this community are against it than for it so why change it?

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300455425 05/15/2008 16:03:53 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
#36300455435 05/15/2008 16:28:58 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
Much better
#36300455438 05/15/2008 16:42:10 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
I wouldn't have minded if they added another Gi which had pants, but they didn't, they replaced something which is a different story.  But far be it from me to voice my oponion, I mean I only pay a subscription.



   My problem with adding pants to the female gi stems from the fact that it's based on Jue's outfit at the beginning of "Final Flight of the Osiris".  By changing it, they've removed a link to a previous Matrix product, and hasn't there been enough complaints about MxO drifting away from such things?

   I have no problem with adding a new set of gi with pants in addition to the ones we have.  But I wouldn't be surprised if Rarebit's next move will be to remove the tails off of the Neo trenches so they don't resemble dresses.
#36300455457 05/15/2008 17:10:14 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
What you basically did was praise Rarebit, which was a good idea yes, but add no counter argument as to why we shouldn't have to deal with it. We pay $15 to play a game. If you simply do not enjoy said game, or it's direction, they don't get your $15 anymore. Also, if one were to unsub because female RSIs are de-skankified just a little bit, then you have a rough road ahead in life.

Why SHOULD we have to deal with it? Because Rarebit is one man.

Also: He made the decision to do it. Would you really want one patch to contain pants, a hotfix next week containing NO pants, then a weeks worth of flaming and pointless discussion only for it to be changed back again, and the cycle again repeats?
#36300455484 05/15/2008 17:32:31 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Roukan wrote:
Also, if one were to unsub because female RSIs are de-skankified just a little bit, then you have a rough road ahead in life.


Huh?  Since when were they "skanky" in the first place?  I thought the Gi was a nod/reference to FFOTO. 

Anyways "de-skankifying"stuff in MxO could be a slippery slope...  I don't think we should go down that road.

#36300455493 05/15/2008 17:44:19 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The_Big_V wrote:
Roukan wrote:
Also, if one were to unsub because female RSIs are de-skankified just a little bit, then you have a rough road ahead in life.


Huh?  Since when were they "skanky" in the first place?  I thought the Gi was a nod/reference to FFOTO. 

Anyways "de-skankifying"stuff in MxO could be a slippery slope...  I don't think we should go down that road.

Rarebit wrote:
ZaneZavin wrote:
That would be a waste of dev time.  Nothing to see here,  Move along.
Not to worry, I just spent sleep time on it instead. I'm kind of digging the pants thing, aka, the de-skankification of women's gis:

I'm just agreeing with what he said here.
#36300455568 05/15/2008 21:10:29 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Unfortunately people are bound to complain. It's a known fact that people get far louder when they want something changed or when they are unhappy. That is why the focus seems to be on the stuff people don't like.

The new guns, nice. The new farming in Datamine, I'll get to it when the swarm of mechs clears from the helipad (Least populated org my arse). The content in One Zero, will be a nice speedbump for my alts in the long grind to lvl 50, and I can sell them to make more cash.

All in all the update isn't exactly what I wanted  (I don't like the content in hostile FFA Zones) but a lot of people were asking for it so fair enough that they get what they want (Hopefully the next content will be outside of PvP and FFA zones). The female Gi however, it seems a VERY SMALL minority of people wanted it yet it still went through, that's why we take issue. A great deal of the community has been snubbed for the benefit of a few people.
If you are reading this my sig didn't work T_T
#36300455640 05/16/2008 00:28:03 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Nice patch, lot of work. Grats devs.

In the other hand, and I'm talking as guner, ¡¡STOP NERFING MA PLZ!!
#36300455680 05/16/2008 04:42:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Roukan wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
What you basically did was praise Rarebit, which was a good idea yes, but add no counter argument as to why we shouldn't have to deal with it. We pay $15 to play a game. If you simply do not enjoy said game, or it's direction, they don't get your $15 anymore. Also, if one were to unsub because female RSIs are de-skankified just a little bit, then you have a rough road ahead in life.

Why SHOULD we have to deal with it? Because Rarebit is one man.

Also: He made the decision to do it. Would you really want one patch to contain pants, a hotfix next week containing NO pants, then a weeks worth of flaming and pointless discussion only for it to be changed back again, and the cycle again repeats?
You are missing the point. If we had to deal with it we wouldn't have these boards to discuss the said changes.
#36300455725 05/16/2008 08:31:05 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Leo wrote:
Roukan wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
What you basically did was praise Rarebit, which was a good idea yes, but add no counter argument as to why we shouldn't have to deal with it. We pay $15 to play a game. If you simply do not enjoy said game, or it's direction, they don't get your $15 anymore. Also, if one were to unsub because female RSIs are de-skankified just a little bit, then you have a rough road ahead in life.

Why SHOULD we have to deal with it? Because Rarebit is one man.

Also: He made the decision to do it. Would you really want one patch to contain pants, a hotfix next week containing NO pants, then a weeks worth of flaming and pointless discussion only for it to be changed back again, and the cycle again repeats?
You are missing the point. If we had to deal with it we wouldn't have these boards to discuss the said changes.
No you're missing the point. You're complaining uselessly. Come a month from now if Rarebit doesn't change it, no one will care. They'll think about it in the back of their mind but no one will write on the forums about it.
#36300455738 05/16/2008 09:03:08 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
The Leo wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:
odj wrote:
SaintDaniel wrote:

wow an entire thread filled with pointless *complaining* about a *edited* Gi

were lucky were getting all this in one update, so *edited* be thankful

shhhhhhhhh \m/

We pay money for MxO, if we don't like something about it we have every right to complain. We don't have to be 'thankful' we pay for the content.
then unsub
Why would he? You can't force people to "deal with it". That's why we have these forums. We don't have them only for: Oh thanks devs you rock, thanks for the new content, etc etc.
How long have you all been playing MxO? We've had to "deal with it" since SOE took over.

There's ONE man adding content to a slowly dieing game, he even warned that it would be hard for him to get all the new weapons in this update and he did! ONE man gets to put a ton of hours in to make hundreds happy and all of you complain about a friggin Gi.  Give Rarebit some props for doing something that no one else will nor wants too.
No1 ever questioned the amount of work Rarebit has been doing, and he knows himself that he will be attacked by criticism on these boards about the new/changed content. And no we didn't have to "deal with it" since those changes happen, sometimes triggered by our ideas of changes/improvements. Rarebit is doing great work, and this is how he can get better at it, by interpreting what the community wants or what the game needs.
Much better
LOL SD FTW. I'm in his boat here...it's pretty simple...

don't like the look of the new GIs? Then don't wear them. It changes absolutely nothing within gameplay.

P.s love the new guns, and the new stuff added to data mine is pretty impressive too. I used by crit mission IS reward by accident though SMILEY
#36300455779 05/16/2008 09:53:08 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Brommerz77 wrote:
I'm in his boat here...it's pretty simple...

don't like the look of the new GIs? Then don't wear them. It changes absolutely nothing within gameplay.

Part of the game is the visuals changing the Gi's changes the visuals. Granted its not gameplay but the visuals are a inherent part of this game. (take useropts for example)
#36300456032 05/16/2008 21:06:59 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Gi never looked better, and I say that because it looked crappy before, eh it's late and my arguments are pwn. SMILEY