Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

150 posts · 2008-05-14 15:50:06 to 2008-06-11 13:46:21

#36300454912 05/14/2008 15:50:06 Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
This thread is for discussion of Update 60, which is scheduled to release on Thursday, May 15, 2008.
#36300454915 05/14/2008 15:52:46 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Thanks fellas.

This is a good one  SMILEY


Photobucket - Video and Image Hosting


#36300454918 05/14/2008 15:55:21 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Archive missions will now award full experience each time you complete them.


Awesome.
#36300454919 05/14/2008 15:55:40 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Very, very nice. 

Edit to remove pseudospam.

Starschwar
#36300454925 05/14/2008 15:58:56 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Captain(s), eh? Hmmm.
#36300454928 05/14/2008 16:00:28 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Bayamos wrote:
Captain(s), eh? Hmmm.

Yeah, the level 45 and the level 70 boss.

They were in the last few image retrievals.
#36300454929 05/14/2008 16:02:09 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Zudrag wrote:
Bayamos wrote:
Captain(s), eh? Hmmm.

Yeah, the level 45 and the level 70 boss.

They were in the last few image retrievals.

Ah, right. I misinterpreted that to mean multiple level 70s.
#36300454932 05/14/2008 16:04:28 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
A very nice neat update. I'll be very interested in finding out the details of the new clothing items. I know how I'm going to be spending my weekend and, in all probability, the next few weeks...
#36300454933 05/14/2008 16:04:57 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Female gi's now include pants

¬_¬  Boo  Guess I'll be recycling the Gi when I log on tomorrow, got enough clothing with pants thanks.

And where is the 'Level 100 Agents have been removed'?  >_>

Cool patch though (apart from the Gi change), I should be busy tomorrow SMILEY

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300454935 05/14/2008 16:05:53 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:

And where is the 'Level 100 Agents have been removed'?  >_>


I think that's going to be staying in for quite a while longer.
#36300454937 05/14/2008 16:09:44 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Yarr no combat fix. Good stuff tho with clothing and gun department.
#36300454938 05/14/2008 16:11:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Zudrag wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:

And where is the 'Level 100 Agents have been removed'?  >_>


I think that's going to be staying in for quite a while longer.


Yeah, got that from the story summary.

"Machines mobilized their programs to begin fighting Zion once again"

Underlined for irony.

Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300454942 05/14/2008 16:13:23 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
.

"Machines mobilized their programs to begin fighting Zion once again"

Underlined for irony.

How is that ironic? After Halborn showed up, the Machines significantly scaled back their operations against Zion and EPN. 
Starschwar
#36300454945 05/14/2008 16:19:06 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
kou_urake wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:
"Machines mobilized their programs to begin fighting Zion once again"

Underlined for irony.

How is that ironic? After Halborn showed up, the Machines significantly scaled back their operations against Zion and EPN. 

'Mobilized once again' implies they stopped, which they didn't, we still got level 100 Agents spawning on us.
But this is about the Update notes.  To be honest I am half annoyed by the Pants on Gi change, I was hoping it wouldn't go through as I actually used the Gi as opposed to all the Pants I used ingame (I never wear the mini-skirts.)
Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300454946 05/14/2008 16:21:27 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:
kou_urake wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:
"Machines mobilized their programs to begin fighting Zion once again"

Underlined for irony.

How is that ironic? After Halborn showed up, the Machines significantly scaled back their operations against Zion and EPN. 

'Mobilized once again' implies they stopped, which they didn't, we still got level 100 Agents spawning on us.
But this is about the Update notes.  To be honest I am half annoyed by the Pants on Gi change, I was hoping it wouldn't go through as I actually used the Gi as opposed to all the Pants I used ingame (I never wear the mini-skirts.)

How many Machine criticals were against Zion installations? How many LE's were against Zion targets? Not as many as there would have been without Halborn and Carlyne in the picture. The storyline isn't just restricted to Agent spawns.

As for the Gi, I may start wearing them now, they were far too short before.

#36300454949 05/14/2008 16:35:31 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

I hope that gi issue means they're adding in female gis that have pants and not removing the female gi as seen in Final Flight of the Osiris.

If the good gis are being removed, I'm kicking your *CENSORED* for me never getting to see Bindi in a digital bathrobe again, Rarebit.

#36300454955 05/14/2008 16:50:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:

How many Machine criticals were against Zion installations? How many LE's were against Zion targets? Not as many as there would have been without Halborn and Carlyne in the picture. The storyline isn't just restricted to Agent spawns.

As for the Gi, I may start wearing them now, they were far too short before.


I havent been doing the Crits, sort of lost interest in the story after a couple months of not getting any real info on the Intruders.  And I very rarely catch Live Events.  If the the Agent spawns are there to enhance RP then surely they should have been removed or at very leased cut back to very rare spawns over this time to mirror the cut back after it became second priority?  Then return them back to their annoying selfs for tomrrows patch.

And I was already using the Gi, as were many other people.

But I know the Agents are hear to stay, and I guess my female alt will have to be permanetly in pants SMILEY

#36300454962 05/14/2008 17:02:49 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
" Powerful guard captains have appeared in the Datamine construct and the collector Dr. Martin in Lemone may be interested in some of the items they have."


Don't tell me it's those clothes from the Image retrieval??
#36300454964 05/14/2008 17:07:59 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Female gi’s now include pants.

I hope that means that there are two Female Gi's now, if not guess I have no reason to play my female character.
#36300454965 05/14/2008 17:11:59 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
DPS not DSP.

About Agent spawns, storywise it is cool, but please remember it could frustrate new players.  I would rather see a level scaled pack of Agents instead off the level 100 that instakills newbies.
#36300454976 05/14/2008 17:36:12 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
regarding those anti zion spawns maybe I dunno low level machine operatives in westview, mid level operatives in international and then the full on 100 agent in DT.

And some for the other orgs too I guess.
#36300455003 05/14/2008 18:28:03 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

I very much doubt that there will be two different types of Gi for female characters, for one it would mean another clothing slot taken up in the database and secondly the notes said female gi's now include pants and not Gi's with pants have been added. I see that the Tiger Coat wasn't changed to a Gi for females, this was down to the different clothing slots Gi's have for men and women. Gotta wonder who designed them that way...

As for the Agents, newbies usually stay in Richland to mission and level long enough to find out about the Agents, both the lvl 255 Access Agents (which are just as frustrating to newbies of any Org) and the lvl 100 war Agents.

As for spawning Machinist's in Westview and International I don't see that working tbh. There are fewer Machinists than Zionites (Storywise not actual player figures) and it would be just as prohibitive in time and manpower to stop a Zionite as a random attack as it would be for Zionite Operatives to spawn on Machinists (Zionite aligned Sim's, on the other hand, would be a better idea but that would mean having access to the simulation that the Machines cant detect or shutdown easily). Agents are a far more efficient way to do the intended job.

Zionites are meant to run when they see an Agent, but as mentioned in another thread, running isn't always possible or a single jump (if possible) gets rid of them which isn't very realistic. Some adjustments, as previously stated by a few people, to the spawns would make it more realistic, whether those adjustments are possible is another matter...

#36300455062 05/14/2008 21:19:33 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:

Zionites are meant to run when they see an Agent, but as mentioned in another thread, running isn't always possible or a single jump (if possible) gets rid of them which isn't very realistic. Some adjustments, as previously stated by a few people, to the spawns would make it more realistic, whether those adjustments are possible is another matter...

If zionites are going to have realistic spawns on them (LOL YEAH RIGHT. 255 agents still don't work correctly) then Machinists should also be attacked. Just easier mobs.
#36300455067 05/14/2008 21:29:18 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:

I very much doubt that there will be two different types of Gi for female characters, for one it would mean another clothing slot taken up in the database


You Figure your adding another slot for the Helmet, Glasses, shoes, gloves, so why not make one more slot for the two separate Gi's, and after listening to all the female characters tonight at the party not wanting pants on the Gi's I think the whole idea should be revised.
#36300455073 05/14/2008 21:37:08 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Tomorrow on Syntax: omg y u gank me u r suk
#36300455077 05/14/2008 21:53:01 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

#36300455093 05/14/2008 22:55:31 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.
#36300455097 05/14/2008 22:58:26 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
At the bathhouse parties Catzi and I held female Gi's made really good "Bath Robes".

I don't know why the devs always do things in extremes. People have differing opinions so why not give us BOTH what we want. Instead of this all or nothing policy where the change pleases one group and annoys another. Half the time they can give both groups what they want but just... don't. It really can't be THAT hard to just add one Gi with pants and one without. Then EVERYONE is happy. Hopefully there will be a hotfix for this.

As for the spawns. Why not have low level Machine programs in Westview (The ones in Riot gear) Mid levels in International (The ones with beret's on) and Agents in DT. The exact level can be determined by the devs but scale back the ones in International and Westview for the benefit of newbies.

That makes more sense to me.
#36300455098 05/14/2008 23:01:37 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Great update but for me leveling an alt this is the best addition:
Archive missions will now award full experience each time you complete them.

I have always wondered what difficulty level archive tickets are set at as you don't get a choice like you do from the mission launcher i assume normal?



#36300455099 05/14/2008 23:02:31 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

You have a good point Shickle, and I agree that they should stay.  Hell I am for having two types as well.
#36300455100 05/14/2008 23:03:33 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
TheShickle wrote:
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.
You essentially proved her point.
#36300455101 05/14/2008 23:03:37 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Pylat wrote:
At the bathhouse parties Catzi and I held female Gi's made really good "Bath Robes".

I don't know why the devs always do things in extremes. People have differing opinions so why not give us BOTH what we want. Instead of this all or nothing policy where the change pleases one group and annoys another. Half the time they can give both groups what they want but just... don't. It really can't be THAT hard to just add one Gi with pants and one without. Then EVERYONE is happy. Hopefully there will be a hotfix for this.

As for the spawns. Why not have low level Machine programs in Westview (The ones in Riot gear) Mid levels in International (The ones with beret's on) and Agents in DT. The exact level can be determined by the devs but scale back the ones in International and Westview for the benefit of newbies.

That makes more sense to me.


A "certain" group screams loud enough, and the devs cave...
#36300455102 05/14/2008 23:04:33 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
machete wrote:


A "certain" group screams loud enough, and the devs cave...
Uh what? That certain group was 'me' and I said it as a joke basically.
#36300455103 05/14/2008 23:04:54 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
TheShickle wrote:
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.

I agree phully. a very good reason to not add pants to the Gi.  Why after all this time, decide to add pants to them?  Because someone complained they were too short after 4 years? I just don't get it. :/

#36300455104 05/14/2008 23:07:07 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
I think that's pretty much why =/
#36300455105 05/14/2008 23:10:13 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Roukan wrote:
TheShickle wrote:
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.
You essentially proved her point.

Her point is based on the assumption that all the Gi does is promote sex, which is not true. It is a perverse mind that automatically leaps to such assumptions, and those who do as the assumption says are even worse.

As for me proving her point, was the Gi the only reason he looked? No. He looked because it was being removed SMILEY. The Gi was not being used as a flirtation device either, so with your assumption of me proving her assumptions, it puts your mind up alongside the perverse.

Yeah, I bolded flirtation device. Heheheh.

EDIT: (Nothing wrong with being perverse though).

#36300455107 05/14/2008 23:16:49 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
TheShickle wrote:
Roukan wrote:
TheShickle wrote:
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.
You essentially proved her point.

Her point is based on the assumption that all the Gi does is promote sex, which is not true. It is a perverse mind that automatically leaps to such assumptions, and those who do as the assumption says are even worse.

As for me proving her point, was the Gi the only reason he looked? No. He looked because it was being removed SMILEY. The Gi was not being used as a flirtation device either, so with your assumption of me proving her assumptions, it puts your mind up alongside the perverse.

Yeah, I bolded flirtation device. Heheheh.

EDIT: (Nothing wrong with being perverse though).

It's basically perverted people vs. not as perverted people. Which is stupid. I was the one who suggested pants anyway, and in the original post I said two versions of each gi. Everything else is up to Rarebit. Maybe he just didn't like the fact that it was BARE under the gi.
#36300455124 05/14/2008 23:47:34 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

Good updateSMILEY  I'm happy that we now going to get all the guns updated for level 50's also.

#36300455135 05/15/2008 01:13:18 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Looks good. Nice going, Devs.

Pylat wrote:
It really can't be THAT hard to just add one Gi with pants and one without.
It can, unfortunately. I'll have to dig up the post where Rare explained it, but from what I recall the change to the gis affects all gis because the change was made to its base model. To have gis without trousers/bottoms (pants indeed SMILEY) there would have to be a new base model from which all those could be based. And there is very little space in the database for new base models.

Here it is: http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/...mp;#36300447865

I'm afraid...



...strikes again.
#36300455142 05/15/2008 01:38:36 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
SolidRevolver wrote:

And where is the 'Level 100 Agents have been removed'?  >_>

Yeah...

#36300455164 05/15/2008 03:26:23 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Procurator wrote:
Looks good. Nice going, Devs.

Pylat wrote:
It really can't be THAT hard to just add one Gi with pants and one without.
It can, unfortunately. I'll have to dig up the post where Rare explained it, but from what I recall the change to the gis affects all gis because the change was made to its base model. To have gis without trousers/bottoms (pants indeed SMILEY" />) there would have to be a new base model from which all those could be based. And there is very little space in the database for new base models.

Here it is: http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/...mp;#36300447865

I'm afraid...



...strikes again.
We need not only new database but new servers seeing these lag immensly on wednesdays.
#36300455169 05/15/2008 03:35:24 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The Leo wrote:
We need not only new database but new servers seeing these lag immensly on wednesdays.
Midweek blues mate, they purk up again for the weekend SMILEY
#36300455184 05/15/2008 04:29:55 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Vinia wrote:

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.


I dont perv on Sniper, I have never donned a Gi and gone to so Sky High kicks with someone.  I am more peeved at the fact that because most of my clothing styles all have pants (I dont like the miniskirts and I am MKT so all my combat clothing has pants too) the Gi (which looks uniquie) is the only thing I use on her without Pants.  Now because of a self confessed joke, I have to bin the Gi.  All the people who actually used to the Gi, Catzi's party, all not considered, mabey we dont matter because, again, thats how it looks.

I just fail to see the logic on changing this Gi because people actually used it, if they were left pantless, you cant miss what you never had, but they have gone and changed them and annoyed all the people that used them.  It would be like Xbox 360 (which is basically a set of games where you murder as many people as possible) getting a series of exclusives of Barbie games. 

This would would have been a perfect patch (for MxO) but they just had to ruin it, it was like removing the ability to load the Ballictis and Viral Hypers together and instead of allowing us to load any combo of 2 Hypers, they just allow us to load 1.  Or not removing those Agents 2 months after they started.

#36300455186 05/15/2008 04:45:46 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
TheShickle wrote:
Vinia wrote:

Roukie, if that would be the case, then I'd expect Agent NPC's to spawn on the Zionite NPC's... That would be fun...

As for the Gi's I've spoken to quite a few people who welcome the change, myself included. Thinking a little realistically, apart from the fact that Gi's probably wouldn't be worn other than in competitions and training constructs, a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.

For those who may respond saying 'it's only polygons' I heartily agree, I don't see how many prefer the pantless if it's 'only polygons'. We still have short (very short) skirts with a large range of tops to mix and match for parties, combat etc...

Final Flight of the Osiris proves why they should stay.

ZOMG I want swords!!
#36300455187 05/15/2008 04:47:50 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Mostly a great update.  Way to jump the shark on that gi issue, Rarebit.

Vinia wrote:
a woman wouldn't really wear a short Gi with no pants unless she was trying to seduce or flirt with a male (or female... I guess). Personally I think that while testosterone levels might sink a bit with the change (they're still quite revealing at the top) perhaps a female MA in a tournament wearing a Gi might be regarded more for fighting skill than the boys waiting for her to do a sky high.
As a woman who owns a gi this short, how about no.
#36300455194 05/15/2008 05:22:16 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008

lol about the GI discussion. Come on, there are many other new stuff in this update then just the GI pants, witch i think is about time they came. We need Male Ninja mask!!!

#36300455196 05/15/2008 05:26:02 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
Mindsweep wrote:

lol about the GI discussion. Come on, there are many other new stuff in this update then just the GI pants, witch i think is about time they came. We need Male Ninja mask!!!


Couldn't care less about the new stuff if it means taking away things I already liked.  To use another Metaphor, "We are adding a new construct, but we are deleting Sakura"

I know for a fact I would have used Pantless Gis a lot more than a face mask that currently goes with nothing.

EDIT: It is also the thought behind it too.  It was brought up as a half joke and by the time 2 or 3 people aggreed, it was changed.  Yet there is a massive long thrad about how those Agent spawns are annoying yet there is not even a comprimise.

#36300455201 05/15/2008 05:39:49 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
The thing is its not even as if the game is that detailed in that department its like a barbie doll.
#36300455210 05/15/2008 06:18:58 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
I have had a look at the Gi, and I can say it has ruined the Gi look if I am honest, the pants are too tight to be Gi pants and it looks wrong.  Sharply then recycled them afterwards.
#36300455233 05/15/2008 07:13:37 Re:Update 60 Discussion - May 15, 2008
While we at it lets...

...lengthen the skirts
...replace the naked swimsuit look with a nightgown and socks
...remake body type 3 to look like she's obese.
...add burqas.

...or....

...remove female rsi's all together since fighting is usually a man's job.