[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

61 posts · 2008-02-04 13:58:22 to 2008-02-07 15:54:41

#36300399695 02/04/2008 13:58:22 [9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

 
Operatives,
 
I assure you that everything within the System's power will be done to restore Agent Gray. In any case, we hope that the impending meeting will bring the situation with the intruder to a satisfactory resolution.
 
In fede,
 
Agent Pace
System Liaison
 
 
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
#36300399700 02/04/2008 14:03:50 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Don't die on us, Gray....
Starschwar
#36300399705 02/04/2008 14:05:45 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Heh, this is to good to be true...
#36300399711 02/04/2008 14:18:54 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08


Dang it, I wish I'd been there, just to hear Oldskool's dialogue phirst hand!! ^_^ (no one has more guts) SMILEY



#36300399726 02/04/2008 14:28:48 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Yeah, and no one deserved more to have a sock stuffed in their mouth. I wasn't even there and it annoyed me.
#36300399731 02/04/2008 14:36:25 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
While we are concerned for Agent Gray's well-being and restoration we should concentrate on the next stage, The Intruder has agreed to meet with the Architect for a proper dialogue, we must hope for the best and prepare for the worst. It seems that he will not answer mere Operatives questions but is more than willing to show off his power. We knew of his Terminator codes which is why SIMLO was ordered not to participate in this 'negotiation' but in the end the Intruder wouldn't engage us in negotiation so Gray did what he could, as did Pace, to get to the next stage.

((Ouch... my spelling in that... I'll chalk that up to 2am plus and lag...))
#36300399746 02/04/2008 14:55:11 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.
#36300399761 02/04/2008 15:16:26 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08


Was this in reference to Reinsertion?  Because it sounded like that to me.  

Anyways, I can't wait to see what a proper meeting between the Architect and The Intruder will be like.

Also, Machines, give Gray some personality!  Please!
#36300399766 02/04/2008 15:27:56 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Neoteny wrote:
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.

Amen.
#36300399769 02/04/2008 15:36:39 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Neoteny wrote:
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.

Doubtful, I think the Architect already has a plan in place in case he gets deleted.  There's probably a back up copy in the source.
#36300399774 02/04/2008 15:46:16 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Procurator wrote:
Yeah, and no one deserved more to have a sock stuffed in their mouth. I wasn't even there and it annoyed me.
 Oh chill out Proc. I could have just kept my mouth shut, and it still woulda' ended the same way. I see no reason to show respect for some *CENSORED* who's not gonna show me any.  Besides, I think the "Tough Guy" likes me.
Photobucket
#36300399779 02/04/2008 15:51:32 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
MetaLogic wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.

Doubtful, I think the Architect already has a plan in place in case he gets deleted.  There's probably a back up copy in the source.
A backup of a damaged Agent program that's long been disconnected from the Source to the point that he can actually be classified as an Exile?

C'yea, right, you go ahead and keep thinking that.

#36300399790 02/04/2008 16:13:39 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
ZippyTheSquirrel wrote:
MetaLogic wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.

Doubtful, I think the Architect already has a plan in place in case he gets deleted.  There's probably a back up copy in the source.
A backup of a damaged Agent program that's long been disconnected from the Source to the point that he can actually be classified as an Exile?

C'yea, right, you go ahead and keep thinking that.

((I believe that he meant there was a backup of the Architect, not Gray.))
Starschwar
#36300399805 02/04/2008 16:43:15 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

::Opening Transmission::

Just....just like that. Agent Gray, killed? Deleted? Dead....third, or second, depending on your views, in command...just like that. That overpowerful brute motherless bastard...I wish I could kill him! I have a bad feeling about this meeting with The Architect, and Agent Pace mentioned the presence of an Operative there? That doesn't sound too bright, although I'd be honored to do something like that, Operatives tend to be a little, verbal, which can make the Intruder cranky...and zap....can he really destroy the Architect? IF so, will Deus Ex Machina, the Source, who I believe to be a program running the system, more powerful than the ARchitect, step in? Will the INtruder be destroyed by the Architect? These events on the data node make me hang in doubt...i should reconstruct my Simulacrum...

Be well, repair Agent Gray.

-Operator Fragz

::Close Transmission, Untraceable::

Photobucket
#36300399813 02/04/2008 17:14:48 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
((It'll be nice when a death straight out means someone is dead.))

Well...can't say Gray was being too intelligent in the confrontation. It'll be interesting to see what happens next with this meeting...

((Anyway, too bad they can't change Gray off mission controller, it's dumb when regular missions still have him talking...of course, those might as well be a "recording" anyway. I'm guessing Pace will be controller for the final mission of this subchapter. And, since Pace said a responsible operative might be present at the meeting, I'm thinking it may be in the crit. Live event with only one operative might *CENSORED* off some people, at least for something as important as this.))
#36300399827 02/04/2008 17:50:11 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
"Agent Pace! You are not authorised in this area!"

But yeah, some seriously good screenshots in this one :)
#36300399835 02/04/2008 18:19:13 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
MotorZ wrote:
((It'll be nice when a death straight out means someone is dead.))

((Anyway, too bad they can't change Gray off mission controller, it's dumb when regular missions still have him talking...of course, those might as well be a "recording" anyway. I'm guessing Pace will be controller for the final mission of this subchapter. And, since Pace said a responsible operative might be present at the meeting, I'm thinking it may be in the crit. Live event with only one operative might *CENSORED* off some people, at least for something as important as this.))


((It can be done. There were numerous Zion missions with Anome's fugly little face on them as the controller, and the introductory tutorial mission features a portrait of Niobe and no other controller, as far as I recall.))

I'm sure there's some sort of "fail-safe" in store in case the Architect is deleted. Or maybe not. He does seem like the kind of old coot that would think himself immortal. Either way, I'd still like to see him deleted. If nothing else, we can see what this "backup" is and assess how it can be approached.

I sort of figured that another program might take his place so that some sort of order might be restored, but that perhaps that new order might be a slightly altered one. You know, where the machines aren't at our teeth simply because the Colonel ordered them to be? We've hoped that some other programs and machines have had differing... "opinions," for lack of a better term... for a while now. A change in the establishment might lead to a change in policy.

#36300399842 02/04/2008 18:45:53 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
MotorZ wrote:
((Anyway, too bad they can't change Gray off mission controller, it's dumb when regular missions still have him talking...of course, those might as well be a "recording" anyway. I'm guessing Pace will be controller for the final mission of this subchapter. And, since Pace said a responsible operative might be present at the meeting, I'm thinking it may be in the crit. Live event with only one operative might *CENSORED* off some people, at least for something as important as this.))

Hm, good point.  I just checked the Mission Controllers definition file, and it hasn't been updated.  Suffice it to say Pace wasn't added as a mission controller, so that's not gonna happen.  Could be the Operator, though.  Maybe even "Unknown"?

Or maybe Agent Gray will start leaking black code that spews horizontally out of his eyes.  Then he'll go around removing Zion viruses from Machine programs. =Pppp
#36300399855 02/04/2008 19:04:40 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Shadow-SK wrote:
MotorZ wrote:
((Anyway, too bad they can't change Gray off mission controller, it's dumb when regular missions still have him talking...of course, those might as well be a "recording" anyway. I'm guessing Pace will be controller for the final mission of this subchapter. And, since Pace said a responsible operative might be present at the meeting, I'm thinking it may be in the crit. Live event with only one operative might *CENSORED* off some people, at least for something as important as this.))

Hm, good point.  I just checked the Mission Controllers definition file, and it hasn't been updated.  Suffice it to say Pace wasn't added as a mission controller, so that's not gonna happen.  Could be the Operator, though.  Maybe even "Unknown"?

Or maybe Agent Gray will start leaking black code that spews horizontally out of his eyes.  Then he'll go around removing Zion viruses from Machine programs. =Pppp
((if anything they will probably do as they did in the early chpt 8 Zion crits when the Machiens took out Zion's com-line. Meaning his pic will be there but the operator will take over for a bit.))
#36300399931 02/04/2008 20:36:32 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

((Why do you 'ALL' wear Agent Suits? It a step up from buffed clothing, but it kinda takes away from the Agent's epic.))
((Just like the fact that Agents die routinely.))

Well, I really do think Gray has earned his re-assimilation in a big way. I salute his past efforts, and am glad to have served with him. 

I'm confident that this will be cleared up in a jiffy.

#36300399934 02/04/2008 20:43:57 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Iovai wrote:

((Why do you 'ALL' wear Agent Suits? It a step up from buffed clothing, but it kinda takes away from the Agent's epic.))

(( Can I say that I called this happening a long time ago?  Heh  Well, at least Sareah in her bright white get up and North's good old purple leather were there to spice things up a little. ))

There had better be a back up plan.. though I somehow doubt the removal of the Architect would have the catastrophic result that some are predicting.  My thoughts are with Gray right now in hoping that he recovers and is back to normal operations as soon as possible.

#36300399938 02/04/2008 21:10:47 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
kou_urake wrote:
ZippyTheSquirrel wrote:
MetaLogic wrote:
Neoteny wrote:
You know, if he fried the Architect, then maybe we could get somewhere with some sort of peace negotiation.

Doubtful, I think the Architect already has a plan in place in case he gets deleted.  There's probably a back up copy in the source.
A backup of a damaged Agent program that's long been disconnected from the Source to the point that he can actually be classified as an Exile?

C'yea, right, you go ahead and keep thinking that.

((I believe that he meant there was a backup of the Architect, not Gray.))
Well, my point still stands. In order to ressurect Agent Gray, they'd have to reconnect him with the Source, with all his Smith corruption risks at large. And you can't say such a sudden shock and attack, if not near-deletion, won't have re-awakened the Good Ol' Boy that smells things that don't really have odors.

I, for one, welcome our Uniter and Source of the Gift and Rains back into my warm embrace, as should you all.
#36300399974 02/04/2008 23:05:19 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Intruder: Hey, she knows how to use crosswalks.

Hehe.
#36300399976 02/04/2008 23:12:47 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Shinryu wrote:
Iovai wrote:

((Why do you 'ALL' wear Agent Suits? It a step up from buffed clothing, but it kinda takes away from the Agent's epic.))

(( Can I say that I called this happening a long time ago?  Heh  Well, at least Sareah in her bright white get up and North's good old purple leather were there to spice things up a little. ))


Identification. People try to get as close to their leaders as possibe. Appearance, talk, philosophy. Many Machinists have long become machinelike in thinking and work. And that's one of the reasons, why the Machines approached Operatives in the first place, slowly fades away: Human - Human interaction. Negotiations cannot be done Machine - Human, everybody knows that. And through the Machinists efforts, well, it has become more difficult again.

When their individualism is slowly washed away, the only thing left behind is a Machine.

- GG

((IC reply to an OOC statement? ... >_>))
((Edit: stupid smileys >_<))
#36300399997 02/05/2008 01:15:54 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Ok  so im fairly certain the intruder is  Deus Ex Machina...  am I way late on this?    He is a cocky lil b4stard just like in revolutions   "WE DONT NEED YOU! WE NEED NOTHING!"


anyone else have this idea?
#36300400005 02/05/2008 02:24:10 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
GoDGiVeR wrote:
When their individualism is slowly washed away, the only thing left behind is a Machine.
Eh. Yeah, sure. Except that:
a) Not everyone was wearing Agent suits; and
b) Most of those who were were wearing them because they're part of their faction's uniform, so it's got nothing to do with their personality. We already know what some Machinist factions' official positions are, and their operatives don't always bare that out.

You won't find the Glitch Society's uniform featuring the Agent suit, ever. And no, Lorellei wasn't wearing our uniform.

imax wrote:
Ok  so im fairly certain the intruder is  Deus Ex Machina...  am I way late on this?    He is a cocky lil b4stard just like in revolutions   "WE DONT NEED YOU! WE NEED NOTHING!"

anyone else have this idea?
SMILEY No.
#36300400010 02/05/2008 03:14:45 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
The Glitchers are pretty much the only Mech faction I respect. Maybe the Watchmen, too. Anything else out there, bah.

- GG
#36300400011 02/05/2008 03:21:58 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
H'mm. That's nice... I guess. Don't forget Veritas Lucis, though. SMILEY

((
<_<
>_>
))
#36300400013 02/05/2008 03:39:41 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

null

#36300400024 02/05/2008 04:27:58 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Many of us like to dress in a businesslike manor... what is so wrong with that? Personally, one of the reasons why I joined Tetra was because of the uniform we had then and still have now, the system suit is just a variant. If I were ever to join another faction which doesn't enforce a dress code I'd still wear the suit. The system suit just happens to be a very good looking and smart outfit that I like to wear, I didn't hear anyone complaining about the fact that most of us wear the system shades... or that most, if not all, Cyphs wear bandanas.

I have no problems with other Machinists wearing their own style of attire, but, unless at parties etc..., I will always wear what I find to be an organisational identifier and a smart businesslike outfit, that is the image I like to project. Personality is not defined by how you dress.
#36300400028 02/05/2008 04:39:30 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Vinia wrote:
Personality is not defined by how you dress.
No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.
#36300400031 02/05/2008 04:53:15 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
When it comes to Vinia, at least, I think the pink hair would convey more than her choice of attire. SMILEY
#36300400037 02/05/2008 05:11:14 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Procurator wrote:
When it comes to Vinia, at least, I think the pink hair would convey more than her choice of attire. SMILEY" width="15" height="15" />
Touche. SMILEY
#36300400077 02/05/2008 06:35:09 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
(( I thought he was DEM when he first showed up, Imax... but I really doubt it, what with the "He's a human" thing.

And I always make it a point to *not* wear the system suit at events.

))
#36300400118 02/05/2008 07:37:05 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08

I have faith that the system can restore Agent Gray.

Illyria

#36300400119 02/05/2008 07:38:09 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
kou_urake wrote:
(( I thought he was DEM when he first showed up, Imax... but I really doubt it, what with the "He's a human" thing.

And I always make it a point to *not* wear the system suit at events.

))

((Your looks are completely different anyways >_>SMILEY)
#36300400122 02/05/2008 07:40:52 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Archangel wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Personality is not defined by how you dress.
No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.

Point made. Perception. People don't trust the Machines (Machinists exluded), that's why dressing up as one already gives the wrong idea.

Personality is not defined by how you dress, but personality will be ignored once you make the wrong gestures. Speech ... is only 10% of what we perceive.

Why do you think the Effectuator is so popular? He's wearing goddamn bermudas and a shirt, even if he goes to the Opera.

- GG
#36300400138 02/05/2008 08:16:49 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
GoDGiVeR wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Personality is not defined by how you dress.
No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.

Point made. Perception. People don't trust the Machines (Machinists exluded), that's why dressing up as one already gives the wrong idea.

Personality is not defined by how you dress, but personality will be ignored once you make the wrong gestures. Speech ... is only 10% of what we perceive.

Why do you think the Effectuator is so popular? He's wearing goddamn bermudas and a shirt, even if he goes to the Opera.

- GG

Yeah, but you are thinking as a redpill, we do not dress up to change or create an image with you. You know most of us, we've both made impressions on each other, the first being a long time ago now. No, our appearance is to allow us to project a businesslike authority to those without knowledge of the war and the Machines, it also allows for possible recognition between redpills.

Perception is exactly why I dress as I do. I would rather attempt to look and be an authority with a bluepill in a fitted, pressed suit than in a very short skirt and crop top or even a skintight latex outfit...

#36300400168 02/05/2008 09:22:41 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Take your time bringing him back... *CENSORED* agents...
#36300400230 02/05/2008 10:53:25 [9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
The situation is beginning to spiral, this is usually the point that we need to pull together to stop a threat such as this. Why do you think he wants us all to be reinserted? Control, he wants to be able to control us as he does the programs. Understanding this will lead someone with a clear mind to the correct conclusions.
#36300400235 02/05/2008 10:56:21 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)
#36300400242 02/05/2008 11:06:48 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
The Leo wrote:
(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)

((Agent Gray was in the simulation when the Smith Virus took hold, now I know he doesn't have a 'son after his name but weren't all Agents upgraded after the first film? Also it is Pace that is the least capable in combat (as was written somewhere, possibly in her details) of Agents as her role was to make Machine-Human interaction easier. Gray also has experience on his side with dealing with Humans so I'd say his knowledge is invaluable))
#36300400270 02/05/2008 11:30:30 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Vinia wrote:
The Leo wrote:
(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)

((Agent Gray was in the simulation when the Smith Virus took hold, now I know he doesn't have a 'son after his name but weren't all Agents upgraded after the first film? Also it is Pace that is the least capable in combat (as was written somewhere, possibly in her details) of Agents as her role was to make Machine-Human interaction easier. Gray also has experience on his side with dealing with Humans so I'd say his knowledge is invaluable))
(The upgraded agents literally vanished story wise in the game. The upgraded agents in the movies had names like Johnson, Thompson etc. but still seems weird since when Smith got terminated he came back as an exile and the machines didn't bring him back because he had no use. His knowledge of humans is data that the machines can easily store without having the issues trying to backup an agent)
#36300400273 02/05/2008 11:32:21 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
The Leo wrote:
Vinia wrote:
The Leo wrote:
(Story wise I don't see a purpose of "reviving" a backup of agent Gray since agent Pace can take care of things and he is also an older version i.e. not very capable of fighting as the other agents)

((Agent Gray was in the simulation when the Smith Virus took hold, now I know he doesn't have a 'son after his name but weren't all Agents upgraded after the first film? Also it is Pace that is the least capable in combat (as was written somewhere, possibly in her details) of Agents as her role was to make Machine-Human interaction easier. Gray also has experience on his side with dealing with Humans so I'd say his knowledge is invaluable))
(The upgraded agents literally vanished story wise in the game. The upgraded agents in the movies had names like Johnson, Thompson etc. but still seems weird since when Smith got terminated he came back as an exile and the machines didn't bring him back because he had no use. His knowledge of humans is data that the machines can easily store without having the issues trying to backup an agent)
Not only that but Gray still has some of the Smith virus in him last I heard and the Machines didn't want to risk connecting him to the Source.
#36300400283 02/05/2008 11:42:53 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
((From the Machine efficiency standpoint, which is oh-so-often overlooked, to be perfectly honest, I don't think it'd be worth their efforts to remake Gray when they could just pop a new Agent up in his place two meters to the left without having to go through whatever trouble it would take to reconstruct a particular Agent. It's just a waste of resources and time.))
#36300400303 02/05/2008 12:10:12 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Vinia wrote:
GoDGiVeR wrote:
Archangel wrote:
Vinia wrote:
Personality is not defined by how you dress.
No, but it can certainly be indicative of and most definately gives the first impression which is how 70 percent of the people you encounter will perceive you.

Point made. Perception. People don't trust the Machines (Machinists exluded), that's why dressing up as one already gives the wrong idea.

Personality is not defined by how you dress, but personality will be ignored once you make the wrong gestures. Speech ... is only 10% of what we perceive.

Why do you think the Effectuator is so popular? He's wearing goddamn bermudas and a shirt, even if he goes to the Opera.

- GG

Yeah, but you are thinking as a redpill, we do not dress up to change or create an image with you. You know most of us, we've both made impressions on each other, the first being a long time ago now. No, our appearance is to allow us to project a businesslike authority to those without knowledge of the war and the Machines, it also allows for possible recognition between redpills.

Perception is exactly why I dress as I do. I would rather attempt to look and be an authority with a bluepill in a fitted, pressed suit than in a very short skirt and crop top or even a skintight latex outfit...

We all have seen the pictures.

((Had to say it >_>))
#36300400328 02/05/2008 13:04:00 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Neoteny wrote:
((From the Machine efficiency standpoint, which is oh-so-often overlooked, to be perfectly honest, I don't think it'd be worth their efforts to remake Gray when they could just pop a new Agent up in his place two meters to the left without having to go through whatever trouble it would take to reconstruct a particular Agent. It's just a waste of resources and time.))
(( Agent Gray wasn't an average Agent. Whatever his initial shortcomings, his position as controller for the human operatives has given him invaluable insight and experience. Even Pace can't match it... mainly 'cos she's too daft. Could you imagine an organisation lead by her? We'd be dead in a month. ))
#36300400333 02/05/2008 13:09:21 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
We encounter Agents of varying levels - sometimes 50 or 60, sometimes 100 or 255 for instance.  Just think of the higher level Agents as being the upgraded types even though their names don't match the example from the movies.  Or perhaps we could suggest that change to Rarebit?
#36300400337 02/05/2008 13:21:10 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Didn't they NOT want Gray to return to the Source because he may still have the Smith virus on him? And didn't he WANT to return to the Source some day?

Sooo, I think they'd either try to retrieve his code and stitch him up against his will, or just replace him with another Agent if he was long gone.
#36300400339 02/05/2008 13:25:27 Re:[9.2.4] You will of course be more than capable of terminating the Architect - Syntax - 1/31/08
Funny,  I called agent gray yesterday and he gave me a mission....   SMILEY