I know its kinda old news, but we are getting much closer to its release. Who else is pretty excited about this? I know I am since its being developed be Bethesda whom really suprised me with Oblivion. The setting is far more apealing as well. Ive never played the original Fallout games, but I got a feeling I will love Fallout 3
Who else is pretty excited about this? I know I am since its being developed be Bethesda whom really suprised me with Oblivion. The setting is far more apealing as well. Ive never played the original Fallout games, but I got a feeling I will love Fallout 3.
I am extremely excited about this game. I loved Oblivion as well (more after installing player made mods). While I never really played the original Fallout games I do love post nuclear apocalyptic scenarios
Having played every fallout game ever released, i am worried about this latest version. It is not going to be the same and i'm not sure it will be an improvement. I will give it a chance though and see what they can do with it.
May i remind people that graphics isn't what makes a game fun. While they may add to atmosphere the story, gameplay and things like that make the game. Most of my favorite games of all time are from the old SNES or S-Genesis days.
Of course if they release a Fallout MMO which i have read rumors on i'll be all over that. Especially if they stay true to the genre and feel of Fallout.
Well as i said, ive never played the originals. But from the looks of it it was turn based combat, and that doesnt appeal to me at all, however the setting and story did. Now on the other hand Oblivion had GREAT gameplay. It was the 1st RPG ive played in a long time, and it was because someone finally did it in a way that was boring and repdative to me i.e. the turnbased combat. So in my eyes if Bethesda keeps up the quality like they did for Morrowind and Oblivion, this game can ONLY be an improvement.
Tell me whats exactly is it thay they are straying from. I hope its not the graphics becasue if they released a game the looked like it came out of 1998 then I wouldnt touch it.
Well as i said, ive never played the originals. But from the looks of it it was turn based combat, and that doesnt appeal to me at all, however the setting and story did. Now on the other hand Oblivion had GREAT gameplay. It was the 1st RPG ive played in a long time, and it was because someone finally did it in a way that was boring and repdative to me i.e. the turnbased combat. So in my eyes if Bethesda keeps up the quality like they did for Morrowind and Oblivion, this game can ONLY be an improvement.
Tell me whats exactly is it thay they are straying from. I hope its not the graphics becasue if they released a game the looked like it came out of 1998 then I wouldnt touch it.
They're straying in every way; making it "dark" and "gritty", 3d, Not as intellectually-based as it was (Fo1 and 2 had at least 5 literary references apiece), not turn-based (it's like Dirge of Cerberus, iMax. If you didn't play the original, you just won't get how much it NEEDS to be turn-based), etc.
Not as intellectually-based as Fallout 1&2" so where are you getting this information?
No the 3d thing... w t f? Like I said if they relased a game that looked like it came out of 1998 I wouldnt touch it, and im pretty sure im not the only one. You think Zelda would still be as popluar as it is if they stuck with a 2d map? pfft 3d.... pfft
No the 3d thing... w t f? Like I said if they relased a game that looked like it came out of 1998 I wouldnt touch it, and im pretty sure im not the only one. You think Zelda would still be as popluar as it is if they stuck with a 2d map? pfft 3d.... pfft
Lack of 3d doesn't mean bad graphics, kthx. It's called Isometric. You'll probably enjoy it just fine because you never played the other three. Ignorance is bliss, after all.
Imax you owe it to yourself to go buy the old games and play them. They are probably dirt cheap and worth every penny. Then tell me when you in your shotgun wedding, acting in porn movies, talking about little tribals being abused, trees growing out of peoples heads, the oldschool style intro's and such that you don't feel all warm and fuzzy.
It's those feelings old school fallout fans are worried about loosing.
And you can in Fallout Tactics i believe turn off the turn based play but you will just die gruesome deaths that much faster.
Anyways i'll give it a try. But i'm still wary of the game. Only time will tell if they get it right.
Oblivion and Morrowind have plenty of moments that give you that warm fuzzy feeling, so I have no reason to belive they would cut that out of this game if thats what made the originals so great. Hell even the teaser trailer gives you a warm fuzzy feeling in the beginning with the little love song playing on the radio, it just happens to end with a dark tone.
I think the Fallout fans are jumping the gun on thier opinions and need to just wait and see. Oblivion got game of the year for a reason, and from the sound of it the type of game Fallout was in the past is the perfect project for a company like Bethesda.
I'm excited about this. I liked the first two, minus the ridiculous stuff at the end of Fallout 2 (you know what I'm talking about, and hopefully they steer clear of anything that ludicrous in this one). And especially after getting into the "Jericho" TV series, the concept of a post-nuclear America excites me.
This is a game I've been following since its announcement. I'm a huge Wasteland/Fallout 1-2-tactics fan and despite my fears like a lot of hardcore fans about Bethesda's take on the legendary franchise, I have to give them the chance to renew the franchise. Many original fans would have prefered the game to be exactly like what was done 10 years ago, but I believe that doing a high profile game, but with isometric view and turn based combat in the current videogames industry wouldn't have been a huge success.
The Elder Scrolls series is a very important contribution to computer roleplay gaming, and I totally trust Bethesda to introduce Fallout to new fans (such as Imax, who really well explained the situation). It might not be what Interplay would have done, but with the high expectations from both old and new fans, you can expect Fallout 3 to raise the bar.
And I expect the anti-evolution fans to be disappointed. But that's nothing surprising.
Just because the game doesn't mirror the formula pushed out by other Fallout games, doesn't mean that it won't be an amazing game in its own respect. As long as the story remains true to its roots, I can't imagine it going downhill in the hands of Bethesda of all companies.
Hm.. a friiend of mine said the textures are a bit flakey on PC version if anyone can confirm or debunk this I would appreciate it. I still cant decide what Im getting this for as for RPGs I prefer PC controls but I cant get full HD on my PC on the tv. If the textures are flakey thats even more of a reason to go 360.
Dodgy textures? The PC version graphically inferior to the console versions? That's a technical impossibility! Unless it's actually a real bug that they messed up somehow, in which case there'll be a patch soon or maybe some player-made tweaks to an ini file somewhere.
Despite my initial reservations about this game, it does look fun and I've ordered it (and am praying they send me the PC version instead of PS3 like they did for Far Cry 2). But do I play this or Far Cry 2 first? This is gonna be tough.
I got my Fable a day before the UK release (yay Royal Mail turning a 2 day delivery into a first class delivery!) so hopefully I'll be able to get Fallout 3 early (in fact it's already been packed, just needs to be sent which should be tomorrow.)
I've not played any of the Fallout series before but I like the genre and I love RPG's especially those in which the world is shaped by your decisions, and now I got an 360 I can play them in HD and not have to worry about system requirements.
I got my Fable a day before the UK release (yay Royal Mail turning a 2 day delivery into a first class delivery!) so hopefully I'll be able to get Fallout 3 early (in fact it's already been packed, just needs to be sent which should be tomorrow.)
I've not played any of the Fallout series before but I like the genre and I love RPG's especially those in which the world is shaped by your decisions, and now I got an 360 I can play them in HD and not have to worry about system requirements.
No, I don't always manage to get the TV to myself, plus I like to take my time in games like that and explore everything. Also, with the Good/Bad and Corrupt/Pure system I want to try a few permutations. I'm currently playing the game as a male Good/Pure Hero, next up i'm planning to be a Evil/Pure Female etc..
So yeah taking on Fallout 3 before I've finished Fable 2 sounds like I'm stretching myself a little thin, but at least I'll have something to play for a good few weeks! (Hell, i've even yet to play the motorcycle content on burnout paradise! I blame Buffy)
The min requirements I read for Fallout 3 says dual core processor.
Unfortunately, I don't have a dual core. I'm still stuck with a P4 2.8ghz Hope it will still run on low settings or something.
Man that's a bit ancient!
You can get a dual core for real cheap these days. I got a whole desktop tower for like £300 that was fully kitted out with ram and dual core etc.
Yeah, I just did a search and you can pick up Intel dual-cores in the 2-3 GHz range for under $100. I was amazed by how cheap the quadcores are now too, $100-200.
Oh yeah, I'm also looking forward to Fallout 3, which my roommate pre-ordered and should arrive today.
Just watched the trailer vid for this game the other nite and I'm sold. Looks fantastic. BTW, Virrago I think you should ask for a raise or a Christmas bonus and buy a new computer
Yeah, I just did a search and you can pick up Intel dual-cores in the 2-3 GHz range for under $100. I was amazed by how cheap the quadcores are now too, $100-200.
My problem is that I'd have to upgrade my Motherboard... If I have to do that, I may as well get new RAM, video card, and case (since i'd also need a bigger powersupply).
With the baby in the house, I don't see that happening anytime soon
I was about to say - the motherboard will probably have to be changed for a dual-core, so it's more complicated than it sounds. I had exactly the same problem with Assassin's Creed: the first game to require a dual-core processor, and while one was available for my motherboard and socket type, it was incredibly rare by that point and because of the sudden demand the price had gone crazy.
I was about to say - the motherboard will probably have to be changed for a dual-core, so it's more complicated than it sounds. I had exactly the same problem with Assassin's Creed: the first game to require a dual-core processor, and while one was available for my motherboard and socket type, it was incredibly rare by that point and because of the sudden demand the price had gone crazy.
So I waited and got a new PC.
Got a console you can buy it for instead?
Bleh... I can't resist... I just purchased on Steam. My work computer will run it... I'll just play it when I'm off the clock muhahahaha
Yeah, I just did a search and you can pick up Intel dual-cores in the 2-3 GHz range for under $100. I was amazed by how cheap the quadcores are now too, $100-200.
My problem is that I'd have to upgrade my Motherboard... If I have to do that, I may as well get new RAM, video card, and case (since i'd also need a bigger powersupply).
With the baby in the house, I don't see that happening anytime soon
Ya man I feel ya. When I got my dual-core, it wouldn't fit in the mobo slot ofc (they wanna make u buy more stuff, so they change the pin config), so i had to buy a mobo, which wouldn't fit in the case, and then the case and eventually the optional power supply (400mhz was recommended so i didnt wanna take any chances).