[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

41 posts · 2007-05-18 20:01:17 to 2007-05-26 19:18:16

#36300240114 05/18/2007 20:01:17 [7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07


Buon giorno, operatives. I was pleased to be able to speak with many of you about current operations. It is refreshing to see your enthusiasm for protecting the System.

Efficientemente,

Agent Pace
System Liaison


#36300240122 05/18/2007 20:09:30 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

I loved the bit where it said "Ignoring NightTrace". Yet, it didn't say anything about ignoring the Cypherites at the Q&A session or the one talking about how hot it was to make-out with Veil.

PS: I bet you were REALLY dreading making this thread, Mr. Bit. SMILEY

#36300240127 05/18/2007 20:16:14 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Oooh, wow, he flipped someone the bird. Totally inappropiate Matrix behavior.

Well, anyway, nice to see just how much Pace has been affected, and to see her freely conversing with even the Cypherites.

#36300240139 05/18/2007 20:31:04 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Thanks for the pity event. Im glad I could make it, even if I did get ignored for being IC.
#36300240146 05/18/2007 20:45:24 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Take Car, Agent

JL10899sig
#36300240167 05/18/2007 21:23:16 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Well, Agent Pace, that was certainly a very productive meeting. I am hoping that the relationship between the Machinists and the Cypherites continues to improve.

Oh, and thanks to all of the Machinists who helped out, tonight.

Yes, Cappy, that means you.

#36300240181 05/18/2007 21:35:39 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Well, that certainly appeared to be rather pointless. So the new way of "operating with" the Cypherites that Gray spoke of was simply offering them more power and influence? And Pace seems proud of herself for "negotiating" such a great deal? *sighs*
#36300240183 05/18/2007 21:37:10 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

The sooner we speak, the better, Machines. It isn't speaking much to your character, or your willingness to maintain peace, for that matter, that you would continue to sponsor those who are killing our operatives, sabotaging our equipment, spying on us, and lying to the inhabitants of your own System, even after your so-called "control factor" has been removed.

God help me, if something doesn't happen soon... Maybe I'll see it plainly why Morpheus did what he did.

#36300240190 05/18/2007 21:45:31 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Iovai wrote:

Oh, and thanks to all of the Machinists who helped out, tonight.

Yes, Cappy, that means you.


/bowhead





As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.
#36300240209 05/18/2007 22:20:36 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
ThePigeonKing wrote:
Iovai wrote:

Oh, and thanks to all of the Machinists who helped out, tonight.

Yes, Cappy, that means you.


/bowhead





As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

You're only feeding the fire by supporting Cypherite relations. It'll only serve to make Zionites bitter, especially we who believe wholeheartedly in this Truce. And that will foster further E Pluribus Neo support, if not bolster their ranks.

I would also like to take this opportunity to reassert that in no way does Zion as a whole support E Pluribus Neo. Should individual operatives decide to do so, that is at their own discression, poor though it may be.

However, the fact remains that the Cypherites have killed our Captains in cold blood, not to mention the recent case where they then used the stolen hovercraft to EMP bomb the gates of Zion. What was the last "attrocity" that E Pluribus Neo has committed? Stealing information from the System? Come now...

Beside that little fact, if E Pluribus Neo is truly the problem, why are the Cypherites being assigned to spy and attack Zion? Shouldn't they be working on undermining E Pluribus Neo?

#36300240265 05/19/2007 02:33:59 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
NightTrace wrote:
Thanks for the pity event. Im glad I could make it, even if I did get ignored for being IC.

((I guess you're pissed? :-/

Oh and anybody noticed? But since her "repair" she only wears the naughty-naughty (as Rarebit once called them) sunglasses. I guess it's a sign that some of her human characteristics have been removed on the way.))
#36300240295 05/19/2007 04:13:19 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Neoteny wrote:

The sooner we speak, the better, Machines. It isn't speaking much to your character, or your willingness to maintain peace, for that matter, that you would continue to sponsor those who are killing our operatives, sabotaging our equipment, spying on us, and lying to the inhabitants of your own System, even after your so-called "control factor" has been removed.

God help me, if something doesn't happen soon... Maybe I'll see it plainly why Morpheus did what he did.


Rest assured, Machinists aren't pleased either. Note, however, that the Machines have requested Cypherite help in spying on Zion - that's all. The moment that Cypherites kill innocents on Machine orders or as a direct result of Machine orders... that's the day that everything's gone to hell.
#36300240299 05/19/2007 04:15:42 [7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
(( hmm... its odd that the movement of zion's resources has apparently become public discussable knowledge. Thought it was all meant to be hush hush between the agents and certain secret service cyphs. The line between IC and OOC knowledge needs to be kept in mind at all times. ))
#36300240305 05/19/2007 04:20:51 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
(( A lot of people saw it on computer screens, and probably felt like discussing it.

There's a general problem with how much people know. Missions, cinematics, live events... It's all public OOC, but ends up public IC too. I reckon there are just a lot of leaks. ))
#36300240314 05/19/2007 04:32:33 [7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
(( Yeah, spose. But that charistic of OOC knowledge should never comprimise the premise of the story, ya know? Besides, i always presumed hackable computers within your own orgs bases wern't meant to be public knowledge points, why else would they be locked out to their own operatives? ))
#36300240337 05/19/2007 05:04:42 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
(( *Laughs.* That's a point. We should be getting in trouble over that. ))
#36300240346 05/19/2007 05:58:43 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
It's always good to have a question and answer event, as long as theres not too many people..it just leads to chaos.

((I enjoyed reading this thread))
#36300240696 05/19/2007 15:55:33 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Vitamin wrote:

I loved the bit where it said "Ignoring NightTrace". Yet, it didn't say anything about ignoring the Cypherites at the Q&A session or the one talking about how hot it was to make-out with Veil.

PS: I bet you were REALLY dreading making this thread, Mr. Bit. SMILEY


QFT.

What a great way to encourage good roleplay during Live Events.  I guess we're supposed to be saying "lol agn pace ur hot will u mary me plz?" instead.

#36300240714 05/19/2007 16:32:56 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Procurator wrote:
(( *Laughs.* That's a point. We should be getting in trouble over that. ))
(("The operator made me do it! He put a marker on my HUD and i thought I was supposed to hack it!" ))
#36300241706 05/20/2007 23:16:18 [7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
What is wrong with saying lol? it means my l33t d00d laughed out loud right... SMILEY
#36300241815 05/21/2007 07:15:29 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Paying someone usually indicates they are in your employ and most employers are responsible for their employees actions.  I hope the Machines are prepared to be responsible for the Cyperites actions. 

This is a deplorable solution, Pace.  You only stated you would pay for the information, yet put no limits on how the information was to be gathered.  They use more then just hacking to get their information or have you forgotten.  After only a few attempts at coming to a beneficial solution, for all involved, with Zion this is what you turn to and it is backed by Agent Gray.  This may seem efficient now, but many of your future dealings with Zion will be tainted by this solution, thereby decreasing your much beloved efficiency in the future. 

This solution will only lead to increasing tension and distrust of the Machines, the exact opposite of what should be occuring.  One step forward, two steps back... I guess the cycle continues.

~Red

#36300242045 05/21/2007 12:33:56 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Nicely put, RedBindi.  There appears to be no tactic too underhanded to test the limits of the Truce and to test Zion's capacity to work past these setbacks.  We, of course, are up to the challenge for the sake of preserving humanity's freedom, but it sure would be swell if the Machines shared our willingness to cooperate without all the double talk and double standards.

#36300242060 05/21/2007 12:47:42 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
ThePigeonKing wrote:
As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

What are you talking about? A small portion of Zion is supporting us. And you talk about both sub orgs like you know first hand while you are affiliated with neither.

The fact is that EPN is outside of the truce. All that means is that we accept responsibility for our own actions unattached from Zion. The Cyphs are breaking the truce for the Machines who are bound by the truce.

Two years of living the dream... and interpreting it! ~Variel
#36300242108 05/21/2007 13:31:51 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
this was a fun QA session SMILEY
#36300242242 05/21/2007 16:27:11 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Vesuveus wrote:
ThePigeonKing wrote:
As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

What are you talking about? A small portion of Zion is supporting us. And you talk about both sub orgs like you know first hand while you are affiliated with neither.

The fact is that EPN is outside of the truce. All that means is that we accept responsibility for our own actions unattached from Zion. The Cyphs are breaking the truce for the Machines who are bound by the truce.

The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.
#36300242260 05/21/2007 17:01:29 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Iovai wrote:
Vesuveus wrote:
ThePigeonKing wrote:
As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

What are you talking about? A small portion of Zion is supporting us. And you talk about both sub orgs like you know first hand while you are affiliated with neither.

The fact is that EPN is outside of the truce. All that means is that we accept responsibility for our own actions unattached from Zion. The Cyphs are breaking the truce for the Machines who are bound by the truce.

The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.
And just happen to be gettitng paid for every hijack, hack, and murder by the Machines.

#36300242287 05/21/2007 17:33:48 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Iovai wrote:
Vesuveus wrote:
ThePigeonKing wrote:
As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

What are you talking about? A small portion of Zion is supporting us. And you talk about both sub orgs like you know first hand while you are affiliated with neither.

The fact is that EPN is outside of the truce. All that means is that we accept responsibility for our own actions unattached from Zion. The Cyphs are breaking the truce for the Machines who are bound by the truce.

The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.

Your goals have always been similar, nay, the same. They were guiding you with Cryptos leading the front in days past, and they're guiding you with "friendly agreements" in days present.

Soon enough they'll have you conditioned to the point where you won't even need something to guide you in the "right direction", you'll just do as instructed. But make no mistake, they are still calling the shots, and you are still doing their bidding. Whether you care to know it, or you care to ignore it, it is a simple and blatant truth.

#36300242415 05/21/2007 22:12:04 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Neoteny wrote:

The sooner we speak, the better, Machines. It isn't speaking much to your character, or your willingness to maintain peace, for that matter, that you would continue to sponsor those who are killing our operatives, sabotaging our equipment, spying on us, and lying to the inhabitants of your own System, even after your so-called "control factor" has been removed.

God help me, if something doesn't happen soon... Maybe I'll see it plainly why Morpheus did what he did.

I don't think the opinion of outsiders will do any good if they won't even listen to their own operatives...

Perhaps I should ask again why you would want to work for them?
#36300242490 05/21/2007 23:56:27 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Iovai wrote:
Vesuveus wrote:
ThePigeonKing wrote:
As for you, Neoteny... Well, a large portion of Zionites are still supporting EPN. That's a bit strange. While both Cypherites and EPN are misguided groups on the fringe of fanaticism, the Cypherites are at least concerned with the well-being of the System which must be maintained at all costs. E Pluribus Neo disregards the importance of the System and its rules time and time again, chasing its own tail.

What are you talking about? A small portion of Zion is supporting us. And you talk about both sub orgs like you know first hand while you are affiliated with neither.

The fact is that EPN is outside of the truce. All that means is that we accept responsibility for our own actions unattached from Zion. The Cyphs are breaking the truce for the Machines who are bound by the truce.

The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.

BS

For reasons Gami cited.

Two years of living the dream... and interpreting it! ~Variel
#36300242532 05/22/2007 01:55:30 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
GamiSB wrote:
Iovai wrote:
The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.
And just happen to be gettitng paid for every hijack, hack, and murder by the Machines.

Oh yeah? And where did you get that from? The Cypherites have only been paid this time. If they murder and commit other atrocities during the execution of the operation they've just been paid for, then we have a problem. At that point, the Machines will either realise the error of their ways, or I will have lost hope.
#36300242569 05/22/2007 04:12:39 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Procurator wrote:
GamiSB wrote:
Iovai wrote:
The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.
And just happen to be gettitng paid for every hijack, hack, and murder by the Machines.

Oh yeah? And where did you get that from? The Cypherites have only been paid this time. If they murder and commit other atrocities during the execution of the operation they've just been paid for, then we have a problem. At that point, the Machines will either realise the error of their ways, or I will have lost hope.


 Now, now everyone let's keep calm, just to clarify i will quote what Pace said to Veil while sealing the deal from Mech Crit 7.2.5

 Agent Pace: Excellent! Then we have a deal: you'll bolster your surveillance efforts in Zion, and we'll provide payment to the arranged account in exchange, at the established rate. I am glad that our meeting was so fruitful; you see, Veil, that we can be quite generous to those open to reason. We look forward to continued work with our old associates on the basis of this new...understanding.

 Now tell me If I am wrong but to me Proc, that looks like that the Machines will keep paying the Cypherites gathering intelligence, notice however that they don't seem to mention about how they go about gathering this intel so long as they gather it, so I would say that, Proc, that you do have a problem.

#36300242608 05/22/2007 05:47:28 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
We don't know what the terms were. People stumbled into the very end of Pace's discussion with Veil, and could only catch the last sentence of it.

I know it doesn't look good - you think I'm happy that the Machines are using the Cypherites at all? It doesn't seem to have sunken in that they can't be trusted, and that Veil is a maniac. Even after she attacked Pace they want to give her the benefit of the doubt. They'll learn. Eventually...
#36300242917 05/22/2007 14:16:46 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

True we may not have been able to hear the terms. However we did hear Pace's report to Gray and then a small debrief. It's safe to say after considering the characteristics of an Agent and the topic that since both didn't report them to one other and then to us that there are none.


#36300242966 05/22/2007 15:12:02 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

I do not trust Veil at all.

Illyria

#36300243869 05/23/2007 21:27:36 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Illyria22 wrote:

I do not trust Veil at all.

Illyria

And?
#36300245413 05/25/2007 14:52:39 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

'And' nothing.  She's vindictive and violent, willing to kill in the real.  She wants Zion destroyed.  And if it turns out that redpills really can't be reinserted, she will probably lose what little sanity she has.

Things were much safer when Cryptos was leading the Cypherites. 

Illyria

#36300245691 05/25/2007 19:04:14 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Illyria22 wrote:

'And' nothing.  She's vindictive and violent, willing to kill in the real.  She wants Zion destroyed.  And if it turns out that redpills really can't be reinserted, she will probably lose what little sanity she has.

Things were much safer when Cryptos was leading the Cypherites. 

Illyria


Things were much safer when there were no Cypherites.
#36300245763 05/25/2007 19:44:48 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Im still a proponent of the max execution of both splinter groups.
#36300245886 05/25/2007 21:22:53 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07

Awww.

#36300245926 05/26/2007 00:04:31 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
Haigen wrote:

Awww.


Hey, we can be quite forgiving of a cute lil' thing like you.  Just kick the mask, join the Machines properly, and fight to uphold the Truce...  then there'll be no need for you to be executed.

::slides Haigen an application::

#36300246297 05/26/2007 19:18:16 Re:[7.2.5] The Cypherite controller and I came to a friendly agreement - Recursion - 5/17/07
xenin wrote:
Procurator wrote:
GamiSB wrote:
Iovai wrote:
The Cypherites do not break the truce *for* the Machines. We just have similar goals sometimes.
And just happen to be gettitng paid for every hijack, hack, and murder by the Machines.

Oh yeah? And where did you get that from? The Cypherites have only been paid this time. If they murder and commit other atrocities during the execution of the operation they've just been paid for, then we have a problem. At that point, the Machines will either realise the error of their ways, or I will have lost hope.


 Now, now everyone let's keep calm, just to clarify i will quote what Pace said to Veil while sealing the deal from Mech Crit 7.2.5

 Agent Pace: Excellent! Then we have a deal: you'll bolster your surveillance efforts in Zion, and we'll provide payment to the arranged account in exchange, at the established rate. I am glad that our meeting was so fruitful; you see, Veil, that we can be quite generous to those open to reason. We look forward to continued work with our old associates on the basis of this new...understanding.

 Now tell me If I am wrong but to me Proc, that looks like that the Machines will keep paying the Cypherites gathering intelligence, notice however that they don't seem to mention about how they go about gathering this intel so long as they gather it, so I would say that, Proc, that you do have a problem.

At the risk of adding further fuel to the fire:

Agent Pace uses the term, " the established rate".

Procurator is ascertaining that this matter is a "one-off" and I know that xenin has already highlighted the inference that the arrangement could continue. But could Pace's words not also suggest that this is not a wholly new situation?

As mentioned, the whole conversation is not heard and so we can only specualte on what was discussed earlier. But, if this is the first occasion that such cooperation has been sought and obtained, where would be establishment to which Pace refers?

Why not use, "the agreed rate" or "proposed rate"?

May be I am getting tied up on semantics.... I sorely hope so. I do not envy Proc's position in attempting to defend the motives of the Machines.

::EDIT:: Spelling mistakes.