Sneak test
13 posts · 2006-03-07 06:44:37 to 2006-03-08 11:57:00
-Endonesia
Hit'cha till ya seizure

It will break your sneak, so you'll have to: reatreat, put your sneak back on, get closer and execute your move. All in a couple of seconds. no. it's not playable at all right now.
It is completly useless right now.

. Even more humiliating one of the few times i was able to get close enough to an npc (a level 15!) he managed to repel my reverse bulldog attempt!! With all spy appropriate buffs levelled and maxed that was just unbelieveable. I feel there is nothing more to be gained by any more testing until sneak is sorted
God of all creation (Chuck Norris)
Please save us all
and please save assassin.

I was hoping that that was the source of my problems.
... It wasn't.
Sneak definitely needs some serious tweaking.
... On the plus side, it's mainly a number-balancing issue at this point, which means that the system itself has the capacity to function properly.
- Void
ya, i'm new to the mkt tree, and on the ep i was running full mkt and as far as i could go on assassin (which may be useless since the buffs don't stack?)
Apparently i was fully visible to all players in the area, and my knife attacks were only doing about 200 damage which seems low due to the length of cast on some. i used an rsi hack to try putting as many pts as possible into the two categories that helped ranged/balistic attacks, as well as using all the clothes i could find to help with sneak duration and ranged etc and it still didn't help much. I haven't tried against npcs, but in the pvp world (ie my vector world) it is pretty useless. very much a bummer, i like the tree!


NoRepro wrote:
As I have stated in another thread the sneak detection system is getting looked at.
Respectfully, you do realize that this makes the entire spy tree broken beyond all testing?
There should be no higher priority in my opinion.

Cept damage. But yeah I use Assassin a lot and I was utterly shocked (SHOCKED I SAY!) when I tried this build out.
Spadz wrote:
NoRepro wrote:
As I have stated in another thread the sneak detection system is getting looked at.
Respectfully, you do realize that this makes the entire spy tree broken beyond all testing?There should be no higher priority in my opinion.


