A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06

11 posts · 2006-04-02 00:11:49 to 2006-04-05 12:58:55

#35000001475 04/02/2006 00:11:49 A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
To all Machine operatives,

The following is a summary of the Architect's recent meeting with you, coordinated by liaison officer Turring. As my duties at this time of crisis are pressing, I will leave you with the record of the Architect's own words. Follow them carefully.

Efficiently,

Agent Gray

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_01.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_02.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_03.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_04.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_05.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_06.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_07.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_08.jpg

Archived image unavailable: architect_syn_09.jpg
#35000001507 04/02/2006 04:01:52 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
Correct me if i'm wrong, but i am sure that logarithmic growth isn't a bad thing, it means that rate of increase is decreasing over time. Exponential change is what's bad, rate of increase is increasing with time =/.
#35000001513 04/02/2006 06:38:45 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
Would of thought Architect would of posted that.
#35000001527 04/02/2006 18:25:35 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
I feel so bad, they screen'd me telling everyone to be quiet in not-so-nice terms.  SMILEY
#35000001593 04/03/2006 16:38:46 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06


tr0n wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but i am sure that logarithmic growth isn't a bad thing, it means that rate of increase is decreasing over time. Exponential change is what's bad, rate of increase is increasing with time =/.



Ooh. Math is hard. SMILEY
#35000001602 04/03/2006 17:29:25 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06


Rarebit wrote:


tr0n wrote:
Correct me if i'm wrong, but i am sure that logarithmic growth isn't a bad thing, it means that rate of increase is decreasing over time. Exponential change is what's bad, rate of increase is increasing with time =/.



Ooh. Math is hard. SMILEY

Haha.
#35000001606 04/03/2006 18:31:34 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
why is it my invitations to these events always get lost in the mail?
#35000001607 04/03/2006 18:33:48 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06

:o  The Architect (or a MMO designer/developer) made a math error! 'tis a sign of MxO's collaspse! Run for your life!

~Oh, and I like how the Architect can kill Agents by looking at them.

Message Edited by ZippydaSquirl on 04-03-200610:34 PM

#35000001621 04/03/2006 23:24:21 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06


ZippydaSquirl wrote:

~Oh, and I like how the Architect can kill Agents by looking at them.


I also noticed this niftly little ability, the heading "exploit" is quite fitting...

Can you mail me the ability Rarebit, I'm on Syntax:smileywink:

#35000001634 04/04/2006 08:06:47 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06
sorry but nothing in the convo helped me. What was this meeting about, what was the conclusion to the meeting, and also how do you know about these meetings?
#35000001660 04/05/2006 12:58:55 Re: A high-level exploit of the primary program - Syntax - 3/30/06


bean06 wrote:
sorry but nothing in the convo helped me. What was this meeting about, what was the conclusion to the meeting, and also how do you know about these meetings?


Back in the day we had something called the flash system... really nifty thing... told us what all was going down in our org and what not.

However now we pretty much find out (or at least I do) through various sources, and keeping several eyes and ears out...

By the way, let Larry know we appriciate the briefing he gave.

Message Edited by LiquidZ on 04-05-200604:59 PM