aracher wrote:
((But thats the point people have been making all over the boards, they arn't accesible for everyone especially those who spent day after day going to most of the old live events. A Random Place and A Random time not announced is not accessible.))
Thus my assertion that the event was not random at all, but the expected response to the new approach being followed. I'm sorry that the new approach isn't accessible to everyone, but it certainly was to us. We're happy to be the guinea pigs and report an all-clear from this end after the first shakedown.
Silenci0 wrote:
That went as expected...
Yeah when one plays a villain-character whose premise is "reject truth" then it naturally follows that s/he can't make a claim for credibility while IC.
GreyMountain wrote:
Ok. Does your ego fit in that head of yours?
I'm not aware of any textbook psychological definitions which show that stating simple, true facts about one's education and career amounts to egotism. (oh, woe to all those who have filled out an Operative Profile if it did.) Maybe someone can provide an example from an accredited text. How many years of psychology have you taken, that you're qualified to make such a statement, or is that merely the rambling of a dilettante? Don't worry, it's normal to compare one's self to others and one will, category by category, be lesser than some and greater than some. Maybe you skydive and I don't skydive, but if you said, "hey I skydive" it doesn't make you an egotist just for saying so. Amazing how people just pick some pop-psychology buzz words out of the air as if that's the same as understanding the complexities of human personality and behavior. Hey, let's just label everyone here paranoid and that will justify putting an end to this part of the conversation.
PS10N



