[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08

73 posts · 2008-10-06 23:05:36 to 2008-10-09 18:50:04

#36300507679 10/08/2008 16:21:22 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Procurator wrote:
No, I haven't worked on the research. Did I imply that I did, or even wanted to? I don't see your point.

I know you haven't worked on it nor did you ever imply that you wanted to. That is the point. It's the same attitude your handlers have held and it's coming back to bite them in the butt.

As for seeing your code, is there really any reason to? It did exactly what I described in a nutshell. No need to glorify something so simplistic. Oh and as for getting another line, give me a reason too poochie.

#36300507681 10/08/2008 16:24:37 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Ok ok guys.. let's stop the bickering over redpills and bluepills and lets get Proc on his anti depressents.
#36300507689 10/08/2008 17:14:44 Re:Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Procurator wrote:
Stanten wrote:

Back at the yapping, huh puppy?

Cry, complain...whatever. It's your leash holders who have attempted to placate those which Cryptos is attempting to neutralize. Your kind, and by your kind I mean closed minded elitists, have done nothing to further or protect this research, though the help we have recieved from the Machinist side is appreciated.

Puppy? Leashes? Try a new line.
Hypocracy again. But as you said, you'd sooner be that than get things done.
#36300507719 10/08/2008 18:50:07 Re:Re:Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Tranta wrote:
Procurator wrote:
Stanten wrote:

Back at the yapping, huh puppy?

Cry, complain...whatever. It's your leash holders who have attempted to placate those which Cryptos is attempting to neutralize. Your kind, and by your kind I mean closed minded elitists, have done nothing to further or protect this research, though the help we have recieved from the Machinist side is appreciated.

Puppy? Leashes? Try a new line.
Hypocracy again. But as you said, you'd sooner be that than get things done.
I think if we keep calling him on this it might actually start getting to him.
#36300507785 10/09/2008 01:34:40 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08

*Sighs.* I need to have my breakfast.

Stanten wrote:

It's the same attitude your handlers have held and it's coming back to bite them in the butt.

It is? They contracted Cryptos to work on these override overrides, so how is their development biting their posteriors?

Stanten wrote:

Oh and as for getting another line, give me a reason too poochie.

It's boring, it's clichéd. Expand your vocabulary. Something Cypherites need to work on, as we've already established.

Tranta wrote:

Hypocracy again. But as you said, you'd sooner be that than get things done.

Not quite. Stanten and many of you like to use the dog analogy, whereas I don't apply analogies to the Cypherites. I may repeat my accusations, but I don't wrap them up in cute little metaphors.

As cute as half the Cypherite population try to be (or maybe the women calling everyone dearie à la Veil is just a lack of imagination), I can't apply anything as cute as the image of dogs to them. It doesn't work. You're erratic, homicidal psychopaths who will do anything in their power to stop a lasting, conscious peace from forming between Man and Machine, in it entirely for your own benefit. I can't paint flowers around that.

Fatmop wrote:

I think if we keep calling him on this it might actually start getting to him.
You wish. It's not necessary anyway: your very existence 'gets to me', but it doesn't stop me posting.
#36300507788 10/09/2008 01:54:18 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Procurator wrote:

*Sighs.* I need to have my breakfast.

Stanten wrote:

It's the same attitude your handlers have held and it's coming back to bite them in the butt.

It is? They contracted Cryptos to work on these override overrides, so how is their development biting their posteriors?

Stanten wrote:

Oh and as for getting another line, give me a reason too poochie.

It's boring, it's clichéd. Expand your vocabulary. Something Cypherites need to work on, as we've already established.

Tranta wrote:

Hypocracy again. But as you said, you'd sooner be that than get things done.

Not quite. Stanten and many of you like to use the dog analogy, whereas I don't apply analogies to the Cypherites. I may repeat my accusations, but I don't wrap them up in cute little metaphors.

As cute as half the Cypherite population try to be (or maybe the women calling everyone dearie à la Veil is just a lack of imagination), I can't apply anything as cute as the image of dogs to them. It doesn't work. You're erratic, homicidal psychopaths who will do anything in their power to stop a lasting, conscious peace from forming between Man and Machine, in it entirely for your own benefit. I can't paint flowers around that.

Fatmop wrote:

I think if we keep calling him on this it might actually start getting to him.
You wish. It's not necessary anyway: your very existence 'gets to me', but it doesn't stop me posting.
I think you just attempted to hit it from all sides. Let's see if you hit a homerun.
#36300507792 10/09/2008 02:18:42 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08

I never followed baseball.

And now, alas, I have decided to leave this thread for the vultures to pick over. Until we meet again, I guess. SMILEY

#36300507794 10/09/2008 02:28:13 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Perhaps, if I'm fortunate enough.

Oh, and just to put a lid on this useless back and forth: Your opinion on the Cypherites? Dead wrong. And it forever will be.

Other than the homocidal part. We do actually do the dirty work.
#36300507838 10/09/2008 04:26:34 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Tranta wrote:
Perhaps, if I'm fortunate enough.

Oh, and just to put a lid on this useless back and forth: Your opinion on the Cypherites? Dead wrong. And it forever will be.

Other than the homocidal part. We do actually do the dirty work.

Testing new drugs and making sure that the Matrix system is still unsafe, that's reall good dirty work Tranta....Why don't just drop a bomb in here  like Cryptos was about to do, then there wouldn't be anything to worry about in the future and you could go to sleep in peace. End of story?

Sometimes  most of the time you really don't think about the consequences of your actions Tranta and someday it will payback big time.

MindsweepX

#36300507848 10/09/2008 04:43:16 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Procurator wrote:

Stanten wrote:

It's the same attitude your handlers have held and it's coming back to bite them in the butt.

It is? They contracted Cryptos to work on these override overrides, so how is their development biting their posteriors?

Stanten wrote:

Oh and as for getting another line, give me a reason too poochie.

It's boring, it's clichéd. Expand your vocabulary. Something Cypherites need to work on, as we've already established.

They contracted....wow. And exactly what have they contributed to the actual research? I mean they contract the likes of you as well but, well nevermind heh.

As for my description of you being "boring and cliche", ummm yeah I'd say it's pretty much right on the mark then. I was kind of going for something like that since they who constantly complain are quite boring, cliche and pretty much irrelevant as well. No need to expand the old vocabulary when one's already hit the nail on the head.

#36300507854 10/09/2008 04:56:34 Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Stanten wrote:
And exactly what have they contributed to the actual research?
Well they did create the person solely responsible for the research. Intended or not, that is a contribution in the whole scheme of it.

It may not mean anything to the Cypherites, but Machinists look out for the safety of the simulation and it's occupants. It is our methods that are different. That is the source of this recent pissing contest, which is really getting on my nerves now. Argue via PM's not on a public forum.

It would be far more beneficial for the research to be done by both parties but then that would mean the Cypherites have no bargaining chip in the future. If you think about it, joint research would be done a lot quicker and more efficiently and would save lives and stability of the simulation a lot quicker than the progress already been made. So by keeping it to yourselves, yes you are keeping the bargaining chip, but you are allowing the simulation and it's occupants to remain at risk longer. So what is it you're really wanting? Stability of the simulation or a bargaining chip?
#36300508056 10/09/2008 09:56:26 Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Mindsweep wrote:
Tranta wrote:
Perhaps, if I'm fortunate enough.

Oh, and just to put a lid on this useless back and forth: Your opinion on the Cypherites? Dead wrong. And it forever will be.

Other than the homocidal part. We do actually do the dirty work.

Testing new drugs and making sure that the Matrix system is still unsafe, that's reall good dirty work Tranta....Why don't just drop a bomb in here  like Cryptos was about to do, then there wouldn't be anything to worry about in the future and you could go to sleep in peace. End of story?

Sometimes  most of the time you really don't think about the consequences of your actions Tranta and someday it will payback big time.

MindsweepX

I'll take my chances with Lady Luck and her wheel until then.
#36300508059 10/09/2008 09:59:48 Re:Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Vinia wrote:
Stanten wrote:
And exactly what have they contributed to the actual research?
Well they did create the person solely responsible for the research. Intended or not, that is a contribution in the whole scheme of it.

It may not mean anything to the Cypherites, but Machinists look out for the safety of the simulation and it's occupants. It is our methods that are different. That is the source of this recent pissing contest, which is really getting on my nerves now. Argue via PM's not on a public forum.

It would be far more beneficial for the research to be done by both parties but then that would mean the Cypherites have no bargaining chip in the future. If you think about it, joint research would be done a lot quicker and more efficiently and would save lives and stability of the simulation a lot quicker than the progress already been made. So by keeping it to yourselves, yes you are keeping the bargaining chip, but you are allowing the simulation and it's occupants to remain at risk longer. So what is it you're really wanting? Stability of the simulation or a bargaining chip?
The Machines are liars and never respected our organization to begin with. Your lucky to be getting a bargaining chip if it was up to some of us half of your organization would be lined up and executed.
#36300508117 10/09/2008 12:27:20 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Respect has to be earned, not taken. Also, you're the ones gaining a bargaining chip, not the Machines or Machinists. On a similar vein, if it were up to some of us, all of your organisation would be disposed of.
#36300508133 10/09/2008 12:58:33 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Vinia wrote:
Respect has to be earned, not taken. Also, you're the ones gaining a bargaining chip, not the Machines or Machinists. On a similar vein, if it were up to some of us, all of your organisation would be disposed of.
Yes I suppose finding New Zion while Machinists played strategical patty cake isn't worth the Machines respect.

As far as a chip I know what we have and what we dont. What we have  is a chance to bleed the Machines dry not because we want to but because we have to... Remember what happened last time we gave them the benifit of the doubt?

Were well aware the Machinists resent us. We never cared about saving the future this organization was founded on the belief that someday over the rainbow we would get our payoff. Fact of the matter is we didn't... This is a second chance now the ball is in our court and I hope we make some of you pay before we decide to do your organizations dirty work yet again.

#36300508337 10/09/2008 16:33:52 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Most of the time, I pretty much refuse to participate in this stupid vendetta.  I want New Zion destroyed, I think 01 does too, so whatever you do to further that goal, great.  Let's be pragmatists here.

And by "let's" I mostly mean machinists.  Especially Proc, who shows the maturity level of a 12 year old when dealing with us.  But the rest of you too, who consider yourselves purists, idealists, the "good guys."  Get over yourselves and do your job.
#36300508389 10/09/2008 18:01:49 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08

Our job is done when there a no more Cypherites around...and it looks like our wish has come true. Soon you will just be a rat in megacity that the machines wants' to remove from the system. Why? You have no purpose anymore.

#36300508394 10/09/2008 18:27:19 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08

Well you just might want to get back to work because you won't be rid of us anytime soon.

#36300508395 10/09/2008 18:34:37 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Stanten wrote:

Well you just might want to get back to work because you won't be rid of us anytime soon.

Can I qoute you on that?
#36300508396 10/09/2008 18:35:37 Re:Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Vinia wrote:

Well they did create the person solely responsible for the research. Intended or not, that is a contribution in the whole scheme of it.


That's an interesting point of view, even though it's a stretch to state the Machines created the man doing the research. This is hardly the truth as Cryptos is more like a result of a Machine failure, not something they designed and intentionally produced. It's quite likely they would have just terminated him had they ever thought he might one day not be under their direct control.

#36300508397 10/09/2008 18:36:05 Re:Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
ReProgrammed wrote:
Stanten wrote:

Well you just might want to get back to work because you won't be rid of us anytime soon.

Can I qoute you on that?

I believe you just did...
#36300508409 10/09/2008 18:46:47 Re:Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
Stanten wrote:

Well you just might want to get back to work because you won't be rid of us anytime soon.

It is the naive point of view that believes that this is the end of the Cypherites.

Prima Facie.
#36300508412 10/09/2008 18:50:04 Re:[11.2.3] A prototype only. It needs testing. - Syntax - 10/3/08
It'd be bright and sunny out if there were no Cypherites.
But I still don't see the sun.
So I still have work to do.