Filter improvement.

30 posts · 2008-05-23 15:21:13 to 2008-05-24 12:21:16

#36300458798 05/23/2008 15:21:13 Filter improvement.
Would it not be a great idea for the profanity filter to include words like rofl, lol, lmao, lulz, lolz, roflmao, ggz and the filter actually translated it into *laughs*, *chuckles*, *grins* or whatever something similar in the area chat but for the client it still looked as lol or whatever. This would greatly improve the roleplay of events and would make things a bit more "in char" for everybody. All this would take, would be to write it into the profanity filter and voila no more non-rp stuff for the ones who turned it on.
#36300458800 05/23/2008 15:26:25 Re:Filter improvement.
no
#36300458803 05/23/2008 15:27:46 Re:Filter improvement.
lol
#36300458807 05/23/2008 15:35:40 Re:Filter improvement.
I think more *chuckles* would drive Wesker to suicide. SMILEY

I can see where you're coming from, though.
#36300458808 05/23/2008 15:35:59 Re:Filter improvement.
Brommerz77 wrote:
lol

*Laughs out loud* SMILEY
#36300458810 05/23/2008 15:39:59 Re:Filter improvement.
RoganClark wrote:
no

#36300458812 05/23/2008 15:42:43 Re:Filter improvement.
Read again. It can be turned off and on.
#36300458844 05/23/2008 16:45:01 Re:Filter improvement.
I like the idea, especially for the lolz that make it into LE transcripts, but people would purposefully find a way around the filter just to annoy those who turn it on.
#36300458845 05/23/2008 16:48:12 Re:Filter improvement.
While we're at it, let's get a filter that changes the grammar for idiots who can't type in area!

While it would be an awesome idea - doubt it will happen.  Mainly because it's not a factor that will really change anything important [though it does suck for those of us who still enjoy RP and don't play MxO like CS.]

I do hate seeing LE screenshots with, "CrYptOz, how r u, liek wuts ^? w3 k1ll1n t3h z1on 2day?"  Alas, *poop* SUCKS.
#36300458848 05/23/2008 16:51:18 Re:Filter improvement.
I don't think it's a bad idea at all, but at the same time I'm not sure I'd use it... I'm not IC all the time and having to toggle it off and on depending on my mood and the chat channel(s) I'm using at the moment would be too much work.  If I did have it on, however, I would prefer it to be a filter of it's own as opposed to being part of the profanity filter.  I have no issue with there being profanity in the game, both when IC and when OOC, and I always have my profanity filter off.
#36300458851 05/23/2008 16:57:51 Re:Filter improvement.
Shinryu wrote:
I don't think it's a bad idea at all, but at the same time I'm not sure I'd use it... I'm not IC all the time and having to toggle it off and on depending on my mood and the chat channel(s) I'm using at the moment would be too much work.  If I did have it on, however, I would prefer it to be a filter of it's own as opposed to being part of the profanity filter.  I have no issue with there being profanity in the game, both when IC and when OOC, and I always have my profanity filter off.
Yeah, I think profanity is fine, whatever.  Maybe if it ever DID happen - then a SEPARATE filter for it.
#36300458886 05/23/2008 19:17:08 Re:Filter improvement.

I know what Synapse is saying and KanoR's example is pretty close to reality. It would annoy me to see it in LE posts but to be honest you can't prevent those who aren't into the RP side of things as much as other from turning up to events and there will always be those who'll circumvent the filter, so there's no point getting annoyed. All I do, if I see someone adding chat like that in area is ignore what they say. I don't respond to them if they're trying to get attention or are trying to be clever or are just being OOC etc... However, I'll react to a LE character if that character responds to them. I guess it depends on the situation.

What I'd really like to see is an intelligent spam filter... well I can dream...

#36300458890 05/23/2008 19:28:01 Re:Filter improvement.
Wow.

No.
#36300458893 05/23/2008 19:30:08 Re:Filter improvement.

#36300458906 05/23/2008 20:26:39 Re:Filter improvement.
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
#36300458907 05/23/2008 20:27:31 Re:Filter improvement.
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.
#36300458919 05/23/2008 21:13:17 Re:Filter improvement.
Zudrag wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.

Yeah.  Did you know bad troll is bad?

Just FYI.
#36300458939 05/23/2008 23:11:24 Re:Filter improvement.

#36300459026 05/24/2008 07:29:31 Re:Filter improvement.
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.

Yeah.  Did you know bad troll is bad?

Just FYI.
I'd say you were the one trolling

Just FYI
#36300459048 05/24/2008 08:31:32 Re:Filter improvement.
anywhoo back on topic i kinda agree with syn on this for rp but im just "used for  the lol and the other stuff by now too and the stuff that gets me more are the selling  stuff or the annyoing unrelated comments  to events but if people can cosntalny do it you can just use that ignore button for the event as well.
#36300459066 05/24/2008 09:35:46 Re:Filter improvement.
To all the people that feel saying "No" is an adequate response to a thread please choose and do one of the following options

1) Edit your post to include a reason
why!!

2) Drown yourselves in a bath of Sulphuric acid
#36300459067 05/24/2008 09:51:39 Re:Filter improvement.
Denary wrote:
To all the people that feel saying "No" is an adequate response to a thread please choose and do one of the following options

1) Edit your post to include a reason
why!!

2) Drown yourselves in a bath of Sulphuric acid

No
#36300459069 05/24/2008 10:19:52 Re:Filter improvement.
Denary wrote:
To all the people that feel saying "No" is an adequate response to a thread please choose and do one of the following options

1) Edit your post to include a reason
why!!

2) Drown yourselves in a bath of Sulphuric acid


You first.  Whilst you are it, stop trying to dictate how people post.

On-topic, all things considered, it's a no.  I may personally stay far, far away from Internet idioms as much as possible, but that doesn't mean that others can't douse themselves with said idioms and memes, and dance around in a dripping, jolly trot.  It is annoying to have to wade through nonsense to get to the crux of the live event dialogue, but a dedicated filter is going a little far for something which is a relatively small issue.  The proposed and actual censorship is becoming a little too widespread, for my taste.

#36300459070 05/24/2008 10:23:06 Re:Filter improvement.
RoganClark wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.

Yeah.  Did you know bad troll is bad?

Just FYI.
I'd say you were the one trolling

Just FYI

I'd say you're a *CENSORED*.

Just FYI.


I was simply telling him he was not saying 'no', he had to come up with a remark he thought was witty when all it really did was make him look like a *twit*.

Surry that you can't *CENSORED* read.
#36300459072 05/24/2008 10:32:27 Re:Filter improvement.
KanoR wrote:
RoganClark wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.

Yeah.  Did you know bad troll is bad?

Just FYI.
I'd say you were the one trolling

Just FYI

I'd say you're a *CENSORED*.

Just FYI.


I was simply telling him he was not saying 'no', he had to come up with a remark he thought was witty when all it really did was make him look like a *twit*.

Surry that you can't *CENSORED* read.
I'd say that someone is beefing, just FYI.

Rogan ftw.
#36300459073 05/24/2008 10:32:56 Re:Filter improvement.
KanoR wrote:
RoganClark wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Zudrag wrote:


Just FYI, in NOT movie Roman era - thumbs down meant YAY.

Just FYI.
Yeah. Did you know that he's not actually a Roman?

Just FYI.

Yeah.  Did you know bad troll is bad?

Just FYI.
I'd say you were the one trolling

Just FYI

I'd say you're a *CENSORED*.

Just FYI.


I was simply telling him he was not saying 'no', he had to come up with a remark he thought was witty when all it really did was make him look like a *twit*.

Surry that you can't *CENSORED* read.
"Surry" that you can't spell, oh and are you beefing?
#36300459093 05/24/2008 11:55:09 Re:Filter improvement.
Aw you got your butt buddies to come try and troll too?

How cute.

As farm as grammar goes - I'm glad you could pick out only one thing completely obvious and throw it out there.  Yeah, I can't spell 'sorry.'  You're right.
#36300459097 05/24/2008 12:15:14 Re:Filter improvement.
You beefing?
#36300459098 05/24/2008 12:16:57 Re:Filter improvement.
KanoR wrote:
Aw you got your butt buddies to come try and troll too?

How cute.

As farm far as grammar goes - I'm glad you could pick out only one thing completely obvious and throw it out there.  Yeah, I can't spell 'sorry.'  You're right.

And no it wasn't grammar i picked it out, it was spelling
#36300459100 05/24/2008 12:21:16 Re:Filter improvement.
Ok well this thread has gotten out of hand... Since we can't play nice we won't play at all.

Keep in mind that continued player attacks and spam can lead to a forum suspension.