Something INCREDIBLE comes on June 13
18 posts · 2008-03-15 11:44:42 to 2008-03-17 15:51:00
After the flop of the first one I'm surprised they're doing this again.
They ought to just let the TV show be the "moving pictures" Hulk legacy.
This one looks like it wont suck.
Exactly.
The last one was garbage... in my opinion.
This one looks much better, even though I'm not a hulk phan.... not 'great'... but much better than the last.
Isnt that guy the one from 'The Ellusionist' ?The Illusionist, yes. Edward Norton.
I hope this one doesn't suck... The last one was truly abysmal.
The last one didn't look like it was going to suck either.
But it still did. If they can pull it off, the Hulk story could be pretty *CENSORED* cool. But, well, it's just got to be done right... I'll reserve judgment until I see it.
Roukan wrote:This one looks like it wont suck.
Exactly.The last one was garbage... in my opinion.
This one looks much better, even though I'm not a hulk phan.... not 'great'... but much better than the last.
omg, you suck.
BUT, as a real comic book hulk fan, I gotta say this one does NOT look to be good. The CG in the trailer looks like somthing out of Scooby doo, and the Abomination looks NOTHING like he should look. Its really sad, because I love Edward Norton and Tim Roth, but I honestly don't see this one being as good as the 1st. But I loved the 1st and you can bite me.
Phluff wrote:Roukan wrote:This one looks like it wont suck.
Exactly.The last one was garbage... in my opinion.
This one looks much better, even though I'm not a hulk phan.... not 'great'... but much better than the last.
omg, you suck.
BUT, as a real comic book hulk fan, I gotta say this one does NOT look to be good. The CG in the trailer looks like somthing out of Scooby doo, and the Abomination looks NOTHING like he should look. Its really sad, because I love Edward Norton and Tim Roth, but I honestly don't see this one being as good as the 1st. But I loved the 1st and you can bite me.
lol! phine.... but I can have an opinion too ya know. 
I knew my post would get your dander up. -.-
/giggle
So, basically, you all think that this movie is better just cause it's going to have more "Hulk Smash!!" action...*sigh*
The first one was a decent try to make an intelligent movie about a comic book character. However, it failed for two reasons. One: Ang Lee. This guy doesn't know how to make a decent movie without flooding it with petty sentimentalism...Brokeback Mountain or Couching Tiger, Hidden Dragon are good examples of this. Two: the character. Although there are some good Hulk's stories out there(with Peter David as the writer), you can't expect too much from a pantless frankestein. And let's forget that stupidity called "World War Hulk".
I feel sorry for Edward Norton. Being one of the best actors out there, he's going to be in one of the worst movies of these last years.
Some of his best work has come about because of him fighting for creative freedom on his films. I seriously doubt he would do a movie that would make him and the character he played look bad... For more info on this check this link..
You have too much faith in actors. Two examples: The Score and the Red Dragon. In both movies, Norton's character is awful. I don't doubt his involment in some excellent films, like 25th Hour or Fight Club but, as any actor, he do a lot of jobs only for cash. Hulk 2 is one of them.
*Deleted. Double post syndrome attacks again.*