This is why we can't have good pvp

78 posts · 2008-02-11 15:25:43 to 2008-02-29 09:28:15

#36300413398 02/24/2008 02:48:09 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Hank_22 wrote:

Sigh.. Rather than argue the point with you Sneaker I'll just be happy with thinking back on the volumes of players I massacred with my Rifle and how useless it didn't make me feel.


All the best.
####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300413474 02/24/2008 06:12:31 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Hank_22 wrote:

Sigh.. Rather than argue the point with you Sneaker I'll just be happy with thinking back on the volumes of players I massacred with my Rifle and how useless it didn't make me feel.

Remeber when line up the shot didn't require sneak? Oh, yeah that's 1 free fire and 2 specials that would never missed. Oh yeah then there's steady aim which was a IS drainer, but unmissable.

Just few examples of why rifles were formiddable against any load. I'm gonna try and see if I can find my old CR1 hotbar.

#36300413483 02/24/2008 06:41:02 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

I did manage to find some old screenshots of me as a rifleman in CR1, I think any good Rifleman from CR1 will understand my hotbar setups and how they would make a it a formiddable load against any tree. So enjoy, ah the fond memories.............

This is dedicated to the Riflemen of CR1.

So yeah, I know there were really good rifleman in CR1, so to say they were useless is just a flat out complete utter joke.

#36300413607 02/24/2008 12:33:34 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
I liked Duelist better...
#36300413717 02/24/2008 17:48:38 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

"Your sniper shot does 584 damage"

You'll hate me for this, Crowlos, but: useless.

####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300413719 02/24/2008 18:03:58 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Sneaker wrote:

"Your sniper shot does 584 damage"

You'll hate me for this, Crowlos, but: useless.

Nah, I don't hate ya, your just misinformed about a tree you thought was useless, 584 damage in seconds then firing away with specials that did more damge in CR1 then in CR2, negaive states that lasted long so yeah....
#36300413721 02/24/2008 18:16:15 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Sneaker wrote:

"Your sniper shot does 584 damage"

You'll hate me for this, Crowlos, but: useless.


Sneaker I've been shot by you for less than 600 damage sniper shots in CR2.0 mate, that is useless. Just like your combat rez build (rofl?) it didn't hurt a bit.

My favourite screen shot is the one with Sattakan trying to work out what happened, because we all know how unusual it is for him to get killed in PvP... rofl

#36300413785 02/24/2008 21:59:35 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Crowlos wrote:
Nah, I don't hate ya, your just misinformed about a tree you thought was useless, 584 damage in seconds then firing away with specials that did more damge in CR1 then in CR2 

And I have yet to see anything to change my mind.

I'm looking at your hotbar, and I see nothing special. "Misinformed"? There's not exactly a plethora of abilities within the Rifleman tree, or on your hotbar, my friend.

You have yet to counter my point of MKT doing everything rifleman does, but better. Doubley-so with regards to a Hacker in all aspects except Stealth. Or the reason that Riflemen were few and far in-between during CR1.

You just pass over any argument I make, and go straight to "You're ignorant!". Problem is, in a debate with me, that doesn't cut it.

Doom wrote:
Sneaker I've been shot by you for less than 600 damage sniper shots in CR2.0 mate, that is useless. Just like your combat rez build (rofl?) it didn't hurt a bit.

You say that as if it's an unknown anomaly - I'm using Sniper Shot without Line up the Shot.

Doom, his build in that screenshot looks to be pure rifleman, with all the damage buffs therein. Mine's a Rifles/Healer hybrid, a whole other beast entirely. To compare the two is to compare, well, apples and oranges.

But you know that, you're just trolling.

So, if you're going to troll, at least provide an intelligent argument alongside it. The smartest thing you've done in this thread was to leave before you got even further behind.

####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300413795 02/24/2008 22:20:30 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

So MKT has the range that a Rifleman has? Last time I checked the MKT was very dependant on being close enough to use Analyse Weakness back then. In fact if an MKT didn't hit you with subduing throw, run up and analyse weakness, staggering throw and throat cutting throw... Just how are they killing people again?

A rifleman had could slow you from much further, and had more CT bonuses to counter DR, which was something that still effected MKTs, so if the MKT wasnt boosted they had a good chance to miss you with their knives. a rifleman has no need to get close to a target, which in my eyes is the defining feature to a 'ranged attack class'. more often than not a rifleman would kill people before they ever got within melee range.

MKTs were also useless in interlock, they had no abilities at all. And a rifleman while only having one ability worth noting, if loaded with 400 VD mind you, being rifle butt-smash a rifleman still had very contendable CT rolls.

*edit*

You say that as if it's an unknown anomaly - I'm using Sniper Shot without Line up the Shot. an unknown anomaly? to me yes it is, when i snipe people i actually have an intention to kill them, not tickle them. what is the point of sniper shot without line up the shot? higher chance to miss, less dmg, and you're wasting all that time getting into sneak and sniping someone for a low damage hit of 600?

#36300413796 02/24/2008 22:21:04 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Sneaker wrote:

Doom wrote:
Sneaker I've been shot by you for less than 600 damage sniper shots in CR2.0 mate, that is useless. Just like your combat rez build (rofl?) it didn't hurt a bit.

You say that as if it's an unknown anomaly - I'm using Sniper Shot without Line up the Shot.

Doom, his build in that screenshot looks to be pure rifleman, with all the damage buffs therein. Mine's a Rifles/Healer hybrid, a whole other beast entirely. To compare the two is to compare, well, apples and oranges.


As if you were always Sniper/Healer.
#36300413820 02/25/2008 00:18:28 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Hank_22 wrote:
You say that as if it's an unknown anomaly - I'm using Sniper Shot without Line up the Shot. an unknown anomaly? to me yes it is, when i snipe people i actually have an intention to kill them, not tickle them. what is the point of sniper shot without line up the shot? higher chance to miss, less dmg, and you're wasting all that time getting into sneak and sniping someone for a low damage hit of 600?

The defining feature of Sneaker's loadout is that it is entirely dependent upon him having back up.  It is for support only.  Now if he hits you for a 600 damage sniper shot, and then Illyria hits you for a 1,200 damage sniper shot, and then Sattakan breathes on you, you're probably headed for a trip to the loading area.

The loadout is completely useless if he's alone, so he's probably not going to use it.  Unless of course he is a glutton for punishment.

The whole argument as to whether or not Rifleman was indeed "pwn" in CR1 is tired.  The argument that CR1 > CR2 is tired.  Let's look at it from both perspectives rather than "I'm right, and you're wrong so *CENSORED*."

Pro-CR1 Rifleman.

Deadly Shot stunned.  As we are all aware stun was overkill in CR1.  This is a good thing for riflemen as it allowed them to fire (at the same speed that pistols and SMGs fired) round after round at their target.  Virtually every ability in the Rifleman's repertoire was aimed (no pun intended) at keeping their opponent in place so that they could wait patiently for their death.  All at extreme range.  No need for melee.  If you were a good rifleman then yes, your target would be dead before they could be in range for their attacks.

Anti-CR1 Rifleman.

Many of Rifleman's abilities rooted, which was utterly useless considering the root was broken on the next successful hit.  Steady Aim was also a useless ability, as it drained the precious IS required to continue using your abilities; and let's face it, Rifleman's normal attacks were pretty weak at times so it was completely dependent upon having enough IS for the next Deadly Shot/Crippling Shot/Immobilizing Shot/*CENSORED* Shot etc...

Pros and cons.  Something any good debate cannot live without.
#36300413825 02/25/2008 00:44:15 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

CR1 knives had a normal range of 16m. Riflemen abilities were at 20m.

And no, 4m isn't going to win you this debate. So lets not exaggerate with "from much further", and other such phrases.

Doom wrote:
Just how are they killing people again?

Are you now trying to contend the effectiveness of MKT in CR1? Interesting.

You gave me a list of 2 offensive abilities, when I can simply contend with the fact that if Riflemen didn't hit Deadly Shot, Crippling Shot, and/or Sniper Shot, then just how were they killing?

On your side, there's a rather lengthy list of Out-of-Interlock moves to be used (Deadly Throw 300dmg, Crippling Throw 300dmg, Wounding Throw, Subduing throw 225dmg + stun, etc), and on my side... well, that's about it for the 'high' damage moves. Oh, and you may have forgotten to mention Punt and Bulldog - CR1 favourites. Just thought I'd mention them, too. Oh, and Neurodart - which was far more effective (and abused) than any root/movement debuff that a rifleman could dish out.

Anything you can do, I can do better...

Doom wrote:
no need to get close to a target, which in my eyes is the defining feature to a 'ranged attack class'.
Unfortunately for you, I do consider 16m to be a ranged attack.

Doom wrote:
MKTs were also useless in interlock, they had no abilities at all. And a rifleman while only having one ability worth noting, if loaded with 400 VD mind you, being rifle butt-smash a rifleman still had very contendable CT rolls.
Unless you're planning on pitting TRB/Rifle Butt Smash against Punt/Bulldog/etc, MKT still takes this round. While I never said that either side dominates IL, MKT clearly surpassed Rifleman by virtue of their incredibly high-damaging stealth IL attacks, and their many escape abilities.

Doom wrote:
an unknown anomaly? to me yes it is, when i snipe people i actually have an intention to kill them, not tickle them. what is the point of sniper shot without line up the shot? higher chance to miss, less dmg, and you're wasting all that time getting into sneak and sniping someone for a low damage hit of 600?
You may be a lone wolf. I'm not. My build is very team-oritentated: it can heal, and it can rez - for that, I sacrifice the higher-damaging rifleman abilities, and Line up the Shot.

If I'm fighting alone, I'll load up Pure Riflemen, and rack up the kills. Dragoons can attest to that one as of late.

####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300413853 02/25/2008 03:16:49 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Comment removed, I'm not being banned by angry Player Mods who cannot argue.


#36300416136 02/28/2008 06:15:51 This is why we can't have good pvp
Boo Hoo
#36300416274 02/28/2008 10:26:24 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

#36300416350 02/28/2008 12:59:31 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Dxy wrote:

lolz
#36300416387 02/28/2008 14:11:18 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
*CENSORED*, this thread wasn't for paragraphs. tl;dr
#36300416439 02/28/2008 15:26:24 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Summation:

Jumping to grief in PvP is lame.
Jumping for a reason is fine. ie: rifleman shield broken and MA coming at him; knife throwers lurking with neurodarts, etc.
MKT trumped Riflemen in CR1.

That's about the jist of the arguments I've been involved with.

####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300416450 02/28/2008 15:35:36 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Arguing over the old combat system is ftw!

It's like saying: "Betamax pwnt VHS." - And then you go watch a dvd.

#36300416513 02/28/2008 18:12:06 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

#36300416516 02/28/2008 18:15:45 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
except most of this isn't what the thread was even supposed to be about.

It's supposed to be griefing over HJers for the people not afraid of the "LOL HJ QQ IS OLD NUB" troll crowd.

Either get back on topic or lock.
#36300416580 02/28/2008 21:02:00 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Dxy wrote:

OMG EPIC LOL!
#36300416626 02/28/2008 22:00:03 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Jesus, this thread is still around?

Someone kill this f'ing thing.

Old crap being vomited back up over and over.  The smell never gets better people.  And it's hard to get out.

#36300416662 02/29/2008 00:14:52 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
ThePigeonKing wrote:
except most of this isn't what the thread was even supposed to be about.

It's supposed to be griefing over HJers for the people not afraid of the "LOL HJ QQ IS OLD NUB" troll crowd.

Either get back on topic or lock.


You said tl;dr, or "Too Long, Didn't Read". Thus, I summed the recent posts up for you. I apologize if that's not what you were referring to.

I already gave my stance on HJing; perfectly fine so long as it's not entirely for griefing purposes.

####> END BROADCAST - HvCFT MARINER ####
#36300416702 02/29/2008 02:31:40 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

This thread won't die cause it hyperjumps.

~Darminian

#36300416744 02/29/2008 05:09:05 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Darminian wrote:

This thread won't die cause it hyperjumps.

~Darminian

/invoke ThreadRoot1.0
/invoke Delete1.0
#36300416745 02/29/2008 05:14:15 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Subject: Re:This is why we can't have good pvp

Because people take it way too seriously and personally.  And "good" is extremely relative.

Last Word.  I'm taking it.

#36300416873 02/29/2008 09:28:15 Re:This is why we can't have good pvp
Sneaker wrote:
ThePigeonKing wrote:
except most of this isn't what the thread was even supposed to be about.

It's supposed to be griefing over HJers for the people not afraid of the "LOL HJ QQ IS OLD NUB" troll crowd.

Either get back on topic or lock.


You said tl;dr, or "Too Long, Didn't Read". Thus, I summed the recent posts up for you. I apologize if that's not what you were referring to.

I already gave my stance on HJing; perfectly fine so long as it's not entirely for griefing purposes.

Love you, Sneaker. Requesting lock now.