Forum Ranks

44 posts · 2007-11-28 11:28:21 to 2008-05-22 07:34:00

#36300360372 11/28/2007 11:28:21 Forum Ranks
Here is a list of the current forum ranks and the proposed changes.

(Number of days is days since forum registration)


Mainframe Invader - 840 Days + 300 posts

Transcendent - 780 days + 150 posts

Virulent Mind - 720 days + 100 posts

Clairvoyant - 660 days + 55 posts

Veteran Hacker - 600 days + 35 posts

Matriculated Mind - 540 days + 25 posts

Veteran Operator - 480 days + 20 posts

Enlightened Mind - 420 days + 20 posts

Veteran Operative - 360 days + 20 posts

Veteran - 300 days + 15 posts

Encrypted Mind - 240 days + 15 posts

Free Mind - 180 days + 15 posts

Hidden Resource 120 days + 10 posts

Hacker - 90 days + 10 posts (permission for signature granted)

Controller - 60 days + 5 posts

Operative - 30 days + 5 posts

Awakened - 21 days + 5 posts

Redpill - 14 days

Bluepill - 7 days

Coppertop - starting rank



The days required, name order/color are open for discussion...
Any ideas for ranks above the highest rank?


#36300360375 11/28/2007 11:32:05 Re:Forum Ranks

Raise all the post counts. =P

#36300360377 11/28/2007 11:32:07 Re:Forum Ranks
They sound nice cut out the spam in the forums sound good to me SMILEY" /> when will these kick in?
#36300360378 11/28/2007 11:32:49 Re:Forum Ranks
I like that it is time based and not spam based SMILEY heres a question though, how will you be treating the avatar thing ? i believe currently you have to be on the forums for over a year in order to gain the rights to having one, does it still stand in this system ~?
#36300360379 11/28/2007 11:32:52 Re:Forum Ranks

Oooh now there's a turn around, based more off account time than posts. I think that works better as then spamming the boards doesn't have any indication of how long you've been around for.

I'll get back to you on higher ranks though, could start getting a little bit silly though if you're not careful SMILEY

I'm assuming that the custom ranks will be ones (Like Femme Fetale) which will involve players doing something slightly different to get hold of them?

#36300360380 11/28/2007 11:33:22 Re:Forum Ranks
MxO-PhanthomZtryker wrote:

Raise all the post counts. =P


Not negotiable.

#36300360381 11/28/2007 11:33:36 Re:Forum Ranks
Oh, a lot more time heavy than post heavy... interesting... and debateable ^_^

One problem with that is people who play for say a week, quit, then come back months later will be able to achieve the highest ranks despite their limited overall contribution.
#36300360383 11/28/2007 11:34:37 Re:Forum Ranks
nubious81 wrote:
when will these kick in?

Once it is set in stone, it will take me a few days to get them set up.

#36300360384 11/28/2007 11:34:50 Re:Forum Ranks
All I can say is would 'Veteran Hacker - 600 days + 25 posts' get confused with 'Liasion' or are you changing those too?  Everything else is dandy  SMILEY
Darkhawk's Gallery | Section 9's Past | Metal Gear?! It's already active?!
There can only be room for one Snake, and one Big Boss!
#36300360385 11/28/2007 11:35:01 Re:Forum Ranks
TheUnknownShadow wrote:

I'm assuming that the custom ranks will be ones (Like Femme Fetale) which will involve players doing something slightly different to get hold of them?


Correct SMILEY
#36300360386 11/28/2007 11:35:20 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
MxO-PhanthomZtryker wrote:

Raise all the post counts. =P


Not negotiable.


Awwww... =P

I wonder if anyone who doesn't have more than 100 posts after two years even care about getting a higher rank.

#36300360387 11/28/2007 11:35:33 Re:Forum Ranks
SolidRevolver wrote:
All I can say is would 'Veteran Hacker - 600 days + 25 posts' get confused with 'Liasion' or are you changing those too?  Everything else is dandy  SMILEY

I don't like that color actually... Should probably change it.
#36300360388 11/28/2007 11:35:45 Re:Forum Ranks
Pssh I dun wanna be the Tran one, I wanna be pink!!! >_<

but it sounds good, Virrago =P
#36300360390 11/28/2007 11:36:16 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:
All I can say is would 'Veteran Hacker - 600 days + 25 posts' get confused with 'Liasion' or are you changing those too?  Everything else is dandy  SMILEY

I don't like that color actually... Should probably change it.


noo thats the best color!!! but yeah, I guess it would be confused =(
#36300360391 11/28/2007 11:36:44 Re:Forum Ranks
ChloeAnn wrote:
Pssh I dun wanna be the Tran one, I wanna be pink!!! >_<

but it sounds good, Virrago =P

Special Custom Ranks will always overwrite the general earned ranks.

#36300360426 11/28/2007 12:07 Re:Forum Ranks

Ok, since the former thread was locked without this being addressed...


---------------------------------------------------------------------

You should be able to choose any forum rank that you've previously held. Using the current system as an example, if someone with the rank of Veteran were to obtain the rank of Enlightened Mind, that person should have the option to keep the rank of Veteran and not have another rank forced upon them.







EDIT: I don't need to explain my edit to you.


heh heh



Message edited by LordInqubus on 11/28/2007 08:03:11.


---------------------------------------------------------------------




heh heh


#36300360672 11/28/2007 16:57 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
LordInqubus wrote:

You should be able to choose any forum rank that you've previously held. Using the current system as an example, if someone with the rank of Veteran were to obtain the rank of Enlightened Mind, that person should have the option to keep the rank of Veteran and not have another rank forced upon them.


That isn't possible with this forum software. There is no way to choose a rank.

Well, at least this forum software is capable of assigning rank colors and names. At least that's somethin'...

Congratulations to all us Transcendents when the new ranking system goes into effect!


Edit: still don't need to explain my edits to you...


heh heh



#36300361862 11/30/2007 05:52 Re:Forum Ranks
nubious81 wrote:
They sound nice cut out the spam in the forums sound good to me SMILEY<img src="> when will these kick in?


 Cut out the spam in the forums?

  LOL!

  I mean jeez, I have seen practically no SPAM at all on vector - and that means about 2 active posts.  Worthless pointlessness ftw.  There used to be wars of people just chilling on the boards, 4-5 of us answering any and all posts just to have 6-7 seperate convo's.  Wow. Now there is no need for stickies on server forum cause nothing ever gets pushed off the front page.

  As for ranks - *CENSORED* is the point when just about every vet has the same rank.  Post count ranks should be hitting the 5000+ for high. I can only assume that the last boards posts are added to these cause no way did I hit 4k+ on these PoS boards.  So Pblade must be on millions by now....

 Anyhow, put simply,  Give me my rank from the old forums, The one only I ever had ===> encrypted

Ninja!


#36300361906 11/30/2007 06:41 Re:Forum Ranks
Lezel wrote:

Make mine black so it's barely visible..you don't have to label it as anything..but if you did make it black and you wanted to make my day...you can make my rank be either "She Devil" or "Metal Head"

\m/><\m/


If we could actually get requested ranks then....



Archived image unavailable: admin.gif Inqubus

Overlord






heh heh



#36300361950 11/30/2007 07:33 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
Ntrails wrote:

 encrypted

ohhh I like that one.  oh wait... there is already a Encrypted Mind


Should it worry me that I have no idea who you are???  raijins replacement?

  Anyhow, the new rank was, I imagine, derived from the original that I had.  On the old boards I was teh only one ever to reach it (though zippy was on track) and it was one of the 'poster' ranks rather than lurker ranks.

 SO yeah.

1 := I demand my rank back (only been what.... a year and a bit....)

2:= Hello red person

3:= Low post count requirements ftl

4:= Other thoughts;

No waffle 
Teh Pwn
Guardian
Braindead
NECROMANCER -> black or purple
Antidisestablishmentarianist
hitman
Data Miner (more suiter to lurker)

5:TheTaxidermist
My mom thinks I'm cool :/

6:= Krytical (or at least someone... maybe 5k post count+)  deserves ===> 

Krytical
Psychodelic Ninja Pirate Space Monkey Hybrid

Some from here :-= http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/..._id=10400096273

Ninja!


#36300362185 11/30/2007 09:59 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
Garu wrote:
Havocide wrote:
What about those who have 5000+ posts already?

Spammer

Problem with that is if we make a rank for that we suddenly have a ton of people trying to spam 5000 posts... so not going to happen.

Unfortunately, that problem already exists, and will continue to exist regardless of ranks.


BTW, Garu... great name and color suggestion.   SMILEY






heh heh



#36300362199 11/30/2007 10:05 Re:Forum Ranks
ROLLTIDE wrote:
Havocide wrote:
Garu wrote:

It's perfect.  Think about it:

By alleviating rewards for posting, we will dampen the motivation behind spamming.  Spam all you want, no more rankage.

Age before post count.

Though I cant rank up. SMILEY<img mce_tsrc=" width="15" height="15" />
How many more times are you going to say that?  We dont need to be constantly reminded about your custom ranking.


You speak the truth like nonother.

I "heh heh'd"
SMILEY





heh heh


EDIT: I don't need to explain my edits to you...


#36300362238 11/30/2007 11:09 Re:Forum Ranks
ShiXinFeng wrote:
MxO-PhanthomZtryker wrote:
Virrago wrote:
Roukan wrote:
Virrago wrote:
Garu wrote:
Havocide wrote:
What about those who have 5000+ posts already?

Spammer

Problem with that is if we make a rank for that we suddenly have a ton of people trying to spam 5000 posts... so not going to happen.
Not even with the highest day count requirement?
Data Spammer + 800 Days + 5000 posts ?

If you are talking about something like that? I'll consider it but don't get your hopes up.

Now, I've got to step away from the forums for a few hours to edit the first Operative Profile SMILEY<img mce_tsrc=" width="15" height="15">


Make a rank like that... Pretty please?
Not with the spammer title but you know... Like 10000 posts and 900 days or something.

lol, like "Forum Whore" or sumthin. . .

Attention Whore ? or whatever.......



heh heh







#36300362500 11/30/2007 18:03 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
Roukan wrote:
Virrago wrote:
Garu wrote:
Havocide wrote:
What about those who have 5000+ posts already?

Spammer

Problem with that is if we make a rank for that we suddenly have a ton of people trying to spam 5000 posts... so not going to happen.
Not even with the highest day count requirement?
Data Spammer + 800 Days + 5000 posts ?

If you are talking about something like that? I'll consider it but don't get your hopes up.

Now, I've got to step away from the forums for a few hours to edit the first Operative Profile SMILEY" />



  OK. Garu, GROW UP.

  These forums don't have anything like the traffic for serious spam.  A ton of people??  Due to the low movement and inbuilt report mongers the mods would have no trouble finding and spooning anyone overdoing it.  5000 posts? Hell, that is a pretty hefty amount only achieveable by consistant posting over time in multiple forums. I'd be surprised if people even care enough to struggle for such ranks. However, equally, why not put them there anyway? I will hit 5k in time if the boards don't die completely.  But at current rates it will easily be another month.

  I maintain there was nothing wrong with the old 'split' between lurker and poster ranks... but I guess that is too complex.  Equally, there was something enjoyable about NOT knowing the requirements, and finding them out as you go. But meh.  I also don't think ALL hard to achieve ranks should work on registration time.  Certain ranks could be triggered purely through threads visited, or replied to, or started, or many other factors.

  Put simply, If you think that people will SPAM to boost to 5000 posts... lol.  100 posts a day is hard work, and you have to have the long registration too.

 Eqaully I dislike the title Data spammer.  It seems derogatory, Spamtastic would be fine, purely due to the tongue in cheek nature.  Basically try not to tar all the people with high post counts as trolls.  Some (not all) have done a hell of a lot more to keep a community than those with 150 posts, heck, some are the reason  the low posters visit ===> to read good amusing stuffs.  Not to look at empty unchanging boards.
Ninja!


#36300363880 12/03/2007 04:57 Re:Forum Ranks
RemagDiv wrote:
Pretty amazing how ranks can cause this much discussion.

 Better we spend our time pointlessly discussing this than considering the state of the game SMILEY
Ninja!


#36300364056 12/03/2007 11:07 Re:Forum Ranks
Do we know why the transcendent rank was given to so many players all of a sudden? Sorry if this has already been asked.
#36300365218 12/04/2007 22:20 Re:Forum Ranks
I'm not purple anymore. :o

I expect a new color every day! :P
#36300366712 12/07/2007 03:38 Re:Forum Ranks

Liliane wrote:
Procurator wrote:

Spoon Boy - 850 days + 5100 posts
Transcendent - 850 days + 1700 posts
Clairvoyant - 850 days + 850 posts

Perceptive - 850 days

Corrupted Mainframe - 700 days + 4200 posts
Mainframe Invader - 700 days + 1400 posts
Data Cluster - 700 days + 700 posts
Data Node - 700 days

Resource Hog - 550 days + 3300 posts
Encrypted Mind - 550 days + 1100 posts
Virulent Mind - 550 days + 550 posts

Hidden Resource - 550 days

Damaged Mind - 400 days + 2400 posts
Matriculated Mind - 400 days + 800 posts
Enlightened Mind - 400 days + 400 posts

Free Mind - 400 days

Script Kiddie - 250 days + 1500 posts
Veteran Hacker - 250 days + 500 posts
Hacker - 250 days + 250 posts

Coder - 250 days

Bad Sector - 100 days + 600 posts
Veteran Operative - 100 days + 200 posts
Operative - 100 days + 100 posts

Awakened - 100 days

Failed Extraction - 600 posts
Redpill - 200 posts
Bluepill - 100 posts
Coppertop - starting ranK




I support this proposal,

As do I, though i still think the 'parallel ranks' of poster and lurker made it more interesting.

  Most importantly, it means that not everyone of the same play period will be the same colour and there is a lot of variety.  

  For everyone who says forum ranks encourage SPAM-Lite™ I say this:

  I have Spammed these boards as much as almost anyone but zippy.  Not for forum rank, NEVER for forum rank.  But because of the witty and amusing conversations that would occasionally spring up. I'll give an example; http://forums.station.sony.com/mxo/..._id=10800043983 

Nobody Spams for rank, it is done for entertainment.  If you don't find it funny, go play the game and don't reply.  If you like seeing where things will go ==> Come post with me SMILEY

Ninja!


#36300366756 12/07/2007 05:39 Re:Forum Ranks
Procurator wrote:

They may not post for good rank, but I doubt they'll want a bad rank. SMILEY" width="15" height="15" /> Of course, those ranks really would have to be bad... Insulting rank title, truly garish colour, and maybe get the account flagged for inspection by Virrago or a mod.

   What?  You think I would stop posting because of a crappy rank colour? Lol.   I post, as I said, for entertainment. Only way to get rid of my posts is by stopping these boards being entertaining.... you really want that?

 Incidentally. You want to deal with spammers you need to do a post/time online calculation.  I could do 50 posts in 1 hour or in 1 week. I am a spammer in one of those cases, not the other.    As for high post counts resulting in inspection by mods/CS.... lol.  You think they have time to trawl through 4000+ posts?  Or gonna judge on the most recent 50?  That would be absurd.  If the forums were full of SPAm I would be far more inclined to care. SO far there is a lack! As for me, if they ban me from the forums I quit the game. Sure, that shouldn't stop them - cause liek WoW this game has millions of subscribers so 1 more is irrelevant. I would suggest that sony like all companies ruled by the bottom line they will be VERY careful before alienating paying customers. Pblade has a truly astonishing post count, maybe .25 of those could be represented as SPAM. You would ban him? Despite being a pillar of the community (at least until he left.).

  You want to deal with SPAM. Employ mods. That has been done. There are no further steps to take.  Making a pointless and uninvolving rank system will achieve nothing other than being pointless and uninvolving to ALL forumers.

Ninja!


#36300369936 12/13/2007 04:43 Re:Forum Ranks
Procurator wrote:
We can't calculate time online, but we can use time since registration. That's what my entire system is based on: a comparison of post count against time! And if you'd care to read my previous posts, you'd see I've already made suggestions for the cases where true contributors have a high post count.

Additionally, please define 'uninvolving'.

By uninnvolving I mean a system that will have almost no impact or interest.  I do not, i repeat NOT, want people posting for the sake of forum rank.  But I do recall joy and amusement at suddenly and perhaps unexpectedly gaining a new rank.  When raijinn gave us ranks he did so with no explanation and suddenly the community got together and tried to puzzle out the system. I have little time for 'joel thunderguard raijinn', but I do believe - especially in hindsight - that his was a very good course.  

  The old boards DID have a function deciding time logged on/in to the forums. i.e. browsing them.  Mere time since registering has no relevance.  I could spend one in every 10 weeks spamming furiously and it would give the same post count since registary and a continually average poster. I was unaware that SoE had not retained this functionality. (to be fair I hate these boards and always have.)

 I could be registered for 2 years, making 1 post a week. Or I could be registered for two years, never post, and then throw 100 posts out in a a week.  Same post count. One is SPAM t'other is not.  Therefore the 'post count against time' system is clearly flawed.

 I will freely admit that I only read about 80% of the thread before posting - most of it scanning.  I put too little time in now to read religiously. But Pblade is merely the extreme example I use.  Many people will consider my posting Spam -> But there is a thread on vector forums by madbent (who I don't really know apart from by reputation,  and tbh has never been a big contributor to my posting world or in game world) saying 'thanks' for livening up the boards. With what?  Read 70% of the new stuff i put on there and it was just dross, designed to get the community posting and conversing again. Some of it is funny, some less so.  I felt a distinct amount of pride that anyone noticed my efforts for trying to breathe life into a dead dead board.  I am not a pillar of the community, though most of those who count do know me.  I know what community is based on though, communication.  Not all spam is for post count, or out of spite or even malicious.  I do it for interaction.

Ntrails
Heuristic-Hostile

Ntrails
Heuristic-Hostile

Ninja!


#36300372491 12/17/2007 17:55 Re:Forum Ranks
hmm they have changed it lol, but is it automatic? cause it hasnt changed for me just yet, still on commander
#36300373705 12/20/2007 05:59 Re:Forum Ranks
 I would respond in kind but I have little time to split it all up again :p

Procurator wrote:

Ntrails wrote:
By uninnvolving I mean a system that will have almost no impact or interest.  I do not, i repeat NOT, want people posting for the sake of forum rank.  But I do recall joy and amusement at suddenly and perhaps unexpectedly gaining a new rank.  When raijinn gave us ranks he did so with no explanation and suddenly the community got together and tried to puzzle out the system. I have little time for 'joel thunderguard raijinn', but I do believe - especially in hindsight - that his was a very good course.
So your ideal rank system would be one where the community has to 'get together' and work out how it's structured? Doesn't sound like a particularly grand aim to me. SMILEY My proposed system doesn't take that away - the new rank system is clearly defined as it stands, so we've already lost what modicum of 'involvement' the previous system offered. 

Ntrails wrote:

The old boards DID have a function deciding time logged on/in to the forums. i.e. browsing them.  Mere time since registering has no relevance.  I could spend one in every 10 weeks spamming furiously and it would give the same post count since registary and a continually average poster. I was unaware that SoE had not retained this functionality. (to be fair I hate these boards and always have.)

I know what the old boards could do. There was a considerable number of different statistics they could use when defining ranks. Of course I want the old boards back (these poorly hacked versions of JForum are a disgrace to professional web development). But we don't have the old boards, so we have to make do with the few statistics at our disposal.

Ntrails wrote:

I could be registered for 2 years, making 1 post a week. Or I could be registered for two years, never post, and then throw 100 posts out in a a week.  Same post count. One is SPAM t'other is not.  Therefore the 'post count against time' system is clearly flawed.

Every ranking system will be flawed. But mine is less flawed than a system that only relies on time. The goal is (or should be) to make the ranking system apply superior ranks to as many worthy people as possible, with as few false positives as possible. My system has a higher chance of achieving that.

Ntrails wrote:

I will freely admit that I only read about 80% of the thread before posting - most of it scanning.  I put too little time in now to read religiously. But Pblade is merely the extreme example I use.  Many people will consider my posting Spam -> But there is a thread on vector forums by madbent (who I don't really know apart from by reputation,  and tbh has never been a big contributor to my posting world or in game world) saying 'thanks' for livening up the boards. With what?  Read 70% of the new stuff i put on there and it was just dross, designed to get the community posting and conversing again. Some of it is funny, some less so.  I felt a distinct amount of pride that anyone noticed my efforts for trying to breathe life into a dead dead board.  I am not a pillar of the community, though most of those who count do know me.  I know what community is based on though, communication.  Not all spam is for post count, or out of spite or even malicious.  I do it for interaction.

If 'spam' has some sort of purpose and manages to improve the community in some way, it isn't spam. It is the moderators' job to manage spam as best they can, so a ranking system should be able to just work without having to take spammers into consideration. We know that isn't the case, though; we know that the moderators aren't infallable, so my system does take spammers into account and tries its best to handle them. And so far it's the only system (if memory serves) that has attempted this.


  I was merely quoting Raijins system as one that WAS involving.  It would not work again. It was merely a reference.  I have no grand aims - this game ran out of anything grand for me some time ago.  Involving is merely a way of describing the way forum rank affects you. I still advocate your system as the only one with anything like sufficient varience. I am bored of seeing 70% the same colour on the boards.


 
  A system relying only on time is, imho, like a broken pencil...... pointless.

  I do not believe any system, including yours, will ever 'handle' SPAM.  Back when no-spoon existed no one gave a *CENSORED*, it made no difference apart from posting rights.  However degrading you attempt to make high post count ranks they will still be a badge of honour to some extent.  In that sense I do disagree with you, but it is still FAR better than the current system that has only token post counts.

 

Ninja!


#36300375377 12/23/2007 21:01 Re:Forum Ranks
Mashoe wrote:
SolidRevolver wrote:
Mashoe wrote:
Who cares, its a forum!


You cared enough to get your name changed TeeHee  SMILEY<img mce_tsrc=" />

And the ranks are a way for new players to see who is more experienced when asking questions, we know either to laugh or help when someone asks what we see as a 'n00bish' question SMILEY<img mce_tsrc=" />  And we aren't going to all have a dull and universal forum where everyone looks the same.

I mean how can 25 pages of posts (or however many it is) be made about this?
Apparently this thread is where you go to get Mainframe Invader. Lawl?

Personally, I think the rare ranks are a nice touch. But how is it determined that someone will be a Femme Fatale or Security Expert? The only thing I've never understood is the Operator/Veteran Operator title from a RP perspective - but now I am reading far too much into the rankings. I think that while Operator is a nice lower rank, mixing Veteran with Operator can be somewhat insulting to a Redpill when you've considered the MXO lexicon. Just my opinion.
 
    "The End is Near, the Time is Now." | W4rbl4de | Reviled Restoration-CYPHERITES
#36300390057 01/19/2008 16:45 Re:Forum Ranks
I do kind of like being recognized as having been here for a while now, though in forum ranking it doesn't really do anything.  Still kind of nice though, since I don't have much time to actually troll around the forums.
Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket
#36300415807 02/27/2008 19:10 Re:Forum Ranks
Virrago wrote:
RemagDiv wrote:
Either that, or Virrago is just telling us this to toy with us. SMILEY

I never toy about forum ranks SMILEY" />


What's the color? SMILEY
#36300418385 03/02/2008 19:28 Re:Forum Ranks
Perceptive seems like a lower ranking than someone who is Enlightened. 

Matriculated has always seemed like the highest rank to me, just because it kind of gives off the impression that you and the Matrix are one. Just throwing that out there.
#36300418392 03/02/2008 19:36 Re:Forum Ranks
I still wish some type of post count can be incorporated so that not everyone who reg. date is 8-15-2005 gets the same rank at the same time.
#36300451310 05/06/2008 07:55 Re:Forum Ranks
Shadow-SK wrote:
Solution = No ranks!!!

Everyone loses!


  Solution := A homogeneous mixture of two or more substances. A solution may exist in any phase.

   Take all the spoons away ^_^

edit: awww crap, this is in my favourites.  This was probably a necro. >_>

Ninja!


#36300451315 05/06/2008 08:34 Re:Forum Ranks
Ntrails wrote:

edit: awww crap, this is in my favourites.  This was probably a necro. >_>


Only a couple months...

#36300458119 05/22/2008 07:34 Re:Forum Ranks
ZippyTheSquirrel wrote:
KanoR wrote:
Lezel wrote:
Virrago wrote:
I think we need a new Blue rank SMILEY<img mce_tsrc=" width="15" height="15" />


and call it Ultimate Troll ..to show who really plays and who just browses the forums..just an idea

WTB any rank called Ultimate Troll.
Min. Level 7000 (posts)

Most of you are already Ultimate Trolls anyway - so we don't really need a rank for that SMILEY

and I've already said I'll never make a rank based purely on the number of posts you have.... It sounds good on paper but never works out. To many people would be posting more spam, +1 type posts then there already doing.