Is it time?

64 posts · 2007-09-28 10:55:30 to 2007-10-01 01:55:16

#36300331080 09/30/2007 11:25:56 Re:Is it time?
Shi+Xin+Feng wrote:

Wrong. Under the Truce they were radical organizations.


It's not wrong, it's a matter of opinion based on the belief that these organizations are still very radical when compared to their parent.  Case in point, Machinists are exactly thrilled with the Truce being absolved.  Cypherites are revelling in it.  EPN seems to want to strike against the Machines while Zion has yet to reveal any plans to do so yet.

Things may change in the future but as of now, these groups have their own purpose and agendas. 

#36300331082 09/30/2007 11:28:33 Re:Is it time?
Garu wrote:
Shi+Xin+Feng wrote:

Wrong. Under the Truce they were radical organizations.


It's not wrong, it's a matter of opinion based on the belief that these organizations are still very radical when compared to their parent.  Case in point, Machinists are exactly thrilled with the Truce being absolved.  Cypherites are revelling in it.  EPN seems to want to strike against the Machines while Zion has yet to reveal any plans to do so yet.

Things may change in the future but as of now, these groups have their own purpose and agendas. 


Fair enough.

I still think the story would be better with just three orgs to worry about.

#36300331099 09/30/2007 11:51:39 Re:Is it time?
Garu wrote:

Machinists are exactly thrilled with the Truce being absolved


I assume you meant aren't. SMILEY
#36300331107 09/30/2007 12:16:10 Re:Is it time?
MetaLogic wrote:
Shi+Xin+Feng wrote:

Okay, a lot of people have expressed their feelings about whether these orgs should stay or go.

But, I hear a lot of "I (like/don't like) X org)." What I don't hear much of is, do these splinter orgs have a mission? Does this mission differentiate the sub-org from the parent org enough to warrant keeping them around?

Could we get better storylines for three orgs rather than five? Would the game be improved?

Those are the questions I'd like to see answered.

In my opinion, I think the game, overall, would be better with just the three orgs. I don't think the sub-orgs have a good enough mission to keep them. I like being EPN; it makes me stand out in a crowd of Zionists. But, not so much anymore because even this sub-org has been 'watered down' now.

Whether I like it or not doesn't necessarily mean it's good for the game, though.



Trust me, I would LOVE to see the Cyph Org as well as the EPN Org. get their own mission, their own controller, (I want Veil to be our controller), if the Devs actually made us into REAL orgs instead of just splinters, then I would be as happy as a pig in slop.  However, as it's been said from time and time again, due to limited time and limited Dev powers, the Cypherite Organization and the EPN Organization will never become real orgs, just splinter orgs.  Which means every time I do a critical mission, I'll have to listen to Gray's monotone voice, and it's gotten old a long time ago.

 Yes, and those Dev's said that if they did make Cypherite and EPN orgs, then they would have to cut back on Luggables. All fine and good but, seriously, Don't some, if not most, find luggables boring? I mean it's like receiving a toy, but then you get bored with it and throw it away. Now new orgs, not only is it great for RP, but many are demanding it. I heard the demand for new orgs more often than I do for luggables.

Seriously, they treat the EPN and Cypherite orgs like sidelines when they are not. I mean take the Recent Cypherite sabotage in Zion or the Attempted attack on The Power Lines Feeding The Machine City Power, these do not look like sideline consequences. They should be made Real Orgs, might even give this game a boost. I know this is off topic But I think this would give EPN and the Cypherites much more depth and purpose.

#36300331117 09/30/2007 12:28:49 Re:Is it time?
It wasn't luggables, that was just an example. They'd have to scale back just about all non-critical mission new content (quests, etc) instead. I'd love to see fully implemented Cyph/EPN orgs... but at the cost of other new things to do, I don't think its worth it at this time.
Starschwar
#36300331140 09/30/2007 13:07:24 Re:Is it time?
kou_urake wrote:
It wasn't luggables, that was just an example. They'd have to scale back just about all non-critical mission new content (quests, etc) instead. I'd love to see fully implemented Cyph/EPN orgs... but at the cost of other new things to do, I don't think its worth it at this time.

 Isn't quests like luggables in a way? and when is a good time to have new orgs then Star? 2 Months? Years? Never?
#36300331148 09/30/2007 13:19:21 Re:Is it time?
Any time would be good to have new orgs - if it won't mean cutting back on things like critical missions. Which at this point (and until MxO closes, presumably) isn't the case.
#36300331150 09/30/2007 13:20:30 Re:Is it time?
Procurator wrote:
Any time would be good to have new orgs - if it won't mean cutting back on things like critical missions. Which at this point (and until MxO closes, presumably) isn't the case.

Exactly. And yes, luggables are included. *All* non-storyline content would be put on the backburner in favor of the EPN/Cyph orgs. 
Starschwar
#36300331163 09/30/2007 13:44:00 Re:Is it time?
Procurator wrote:
Garu wrote:

Machinists are exactly thrilled with the Truce being absolved


I assume you meant aren't. SMILEY" width="15" height="15" />

Oops, yeah.  Typo FTL
#36300331192 09/30/2007 14:56:03 Re:Is it time?
Shi+Xin+Feng wrote:

Wrong. Under the Truce they were radical organizations. Whereas before, it was EPN's job to awaken everyone and fight the Machines. Now, that is all of Zion's mission. Before the Truce ended, it was the CYPH's job to keep us from awakening any more bluepills and to fight Zion on behalf of the Machines. Now that there is open hostilities, this covertness is no longer needed.

Without the Truce, the mission of these radical groups becomes the mission of the parent orgs. So, having two extra orgs for Rarebit to write about and care for in the storyline is an unnecessary burden that could be using up valuable creativity. I think if it were just back to three orgs (with more dynamic and variety in the factions within those orgs), the storyline would improve even more.

It's crazy to think that Zion, knowing what they are up against, would not want this fairly large group of like minded individuals back with them. And it's equally ludicrous that, under these conditions, the Machines would not want to excercise more control over a group that already works for them. 


Well, as I mentioned in my previous post, folding the orgs would boot out whatever reliable liaisons the playerbase have to get replaced by a no-show just "because they're new and neutral and "We have too many liaisons" namely replacing the well-loved liaisons Fuscienne, Haigen, Tranta, Vogt, SIMLO, Harkee, and Trepetia for another Novalux, Torman, and Stigmatism. Look at LESIG 1.0, Zion players were left out of the loop on their live events in 2006 because their liaisons were a no show, and they never knew when Rarebit was holding an event because of no liaisons.  Recursion Mechs had it bad enough that their liaisons rarely jack in, and one out of the three is not willing to interact with the players because he is an elitist and has hardware compatibility problems with the game.
#36300331200 09/30/2007 15:38:18 Re:Is it time?
They wouldn't dare get rid of the good liaisons, surely?
#36300331211 09/30/2007 15:59:40 Re:Is it time?
Procurator wrote:
They wouldn't dare get rid of the good liaisons, surely?

That's my main concern with folding the Cypherites into mech and EPN to Zion. It would cause too much community problems in general and would kill of the game faster than a life-threatening disease.
#36300331324 09/30/2007 21:02:34 Re:Is it time?
I feel that EPN and Cyph still have enough distinguishing them from the major orgs to justify their existence as separate entities. 

I also want to point out that while there is no procedure for reinsertion, that doesn't mean there won't be one some time in the future. 
#36300331419 10/01/2007 01:55:16 Re:Is it time?
GypsyJuggler wrote:
I also want to point out that while there is no procedure for reinsertion, that doesn't mean there won't be one some time in the future. 
It would have to be at a time when the Machines have resources available to figure it out (that is if they want to). But the Cypherites still have the task of preventing more awakenings.
Info Blog