[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07

57 posts · 2007-07-10 13:55:32 to 2007-07-18 21:32:29

#36300285479 07/17/2007 21:04:13 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
Skill wrote:
Neoteny wrote:

Time is relative - the world has existed for billions, likely trillions, if not more, of years.

There was time before us, and there will be time after us.

Lest we forget that this is really something like the year 3,436,894,003,999 since the emergance of the Earth, and some infinite measure of time since the emergance of existance. But that's assuming existance didn't always exist, which is another matter, entirely.

I'm pretty sure earth is no more than 6 billion years old... assuming time is relative and all that stuff..


Quite possible - I just pulled that number off the top of my head, because, like the rest of us, I don't really know.

We can only really guess, albeit in an educated manner, when our humble planet came to be, just as we can only guess when it will cease to be.

#36300285519 07/17/2007 21:59:21 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
Neoteny wrote:
Skill wrote:
Neoteny wrote:

Time is relative - the world has existed for billions, likely trillions, if not more, of years.

There was time before us, and there will be time after us.

Lest we forget that this is really something like the year 3,436,894,003,999 since the emergance of the Earth, and some infinite measure of time since the emergance of existance. But that's assuming existance didn't always exist, which is another matter, entirely.

I'm pretty sure earth is no more than 6 billion years old... assuming time is relative and all that stuff..


Quite possible - I just pulled that number off the top of my head, because, like the rest of us, I don't really know.

We can only really guess, albeit in an educated manner, when our humble planet came to be, just as we can only guess when it will cease to be.

True, but I suppose you can say the same thing for the rest of the universe. Some people will tell you that the universe is 999,999,999,999,999 years old and others say that it's no more than 10,000 years old. Who knows, they might both be right.
#36300285526 07/17/2007 22:21:39 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
GoDGiVeR wrote:
phi wrote:

Top notch! I would have sold my left leg to be the one talking to Tick Tock.

Given that the war most likely happened some time around 2100 (look at the masses of construction in the Real along with the extensive "sewers"SMILEY even with all the machine labor, construction takes time.

Then say another another 200 years per Matrix implimentation/purge cycle puts us at around the 3300 mark with an error margin of anything up to 600 years. Make it 100 years, like the Zion we have/had. And scratch two of them since the first two versions of the matrix fell flat quickly. Assuming the war ended around the turn of the 22nd century (2100 A.D.) Then that would leave us with the year 2500 A.D.

However, the name plate of the Nebuchadnezza says it was made in the USA in 2069:

Given that they still had the concept of countries at that point, the ship had to be made some time around the start of the war, or just prior. So unless the ship is around 1000 years old, something isn't adding up.


Lol, would you rather have it say:
Mark 3.45
Nebuchadnezza
Prdouced in Factory XYZ in 01
Date 3068

I doubt the Machines would have wanted to arise suspicions by adding REAL dates and facts.
    Hmm, maybe. But I don't believe so.

    What I'm getting at is that M found that plating as part of an actual battleship and used the parts to make a hovercraft.
So while the hovercraft itself may be "new" It was made with parts that were manufactured long ago..
Or at least parts that were meant to be interpreted as having been manufactured long ago.

Oh and isn't there an R at the end of that name?
#36300285869 07/18/2007 09:14:18 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
(( I love seeing these types of events, the dialogue comes off as both humourous and informative. It's very interesting to see all the various exiles/machine programs come to light and find out what there agenda is/what they are programmed for and all that sort of thing, very interesting :)   ))
#36300285957 07/18/2007 10:40:51 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
OOC: Just read this and what a fantastic event.  I hope more like this are coming. SMILEY
#36300286469 07/18/2007 21:30:48 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
I'm still wondering what it was TickTock was waiting for exactly...
#36300286471 07/18/2007 21:32:29 Re:[7.3.5] "What year is it?" - Syntax - 7/9/07
GypsyJuggler wrote:
I'm still wondering what it was TickTock was waiting for exactly...

Y2K maybe.... or maybe the resignation of you know whom who was in office at the time.. cause of a lil issue he had =P