ArchDuke wrote:
Denary wrote:
To be honest after watching the film it wasn't bad, however It was just a Star Trek action film and it didn't feel like a proper Star Trek film which usually revolves around the family of the officers. It was probably better than Insurrection, but it doesn't top any other Star Trek film in my opinion.
It was different because the old formula of stories that revolve around tolerance, galactic diplomacy, and the idea that even through adversity the future can look brighter and more wonderous that we can imagine doesn't sell movie tickets. Moviegoers find that boring and not worth their $10 to see. What I would suggest doing if you like Star Trek is to continue to read the books that come out. The ones that Pocket Books put out are really good and satisfy that Trek need we don't get on TV anymore.
And yes, it was better than Insurrection. Better than Nemesis too, imo. Here's the thing though. It looks like the 'Star Trek Movie Curse' has switched. It goes that the odd-numbered Trek's are of lesser quality than the even-numbered ones. Nemesis was Trek 10 and was weak. Now that Star Trek is Trek 11, and is great, it breaks that rule. Guess this means we'll have to wait for the sequel to see if the curse has really switched sides or not.
As I said to me, as a Star Trek fan, it just didn't feel like a Star Trek film, and definetally wasn't as good as Nemesis. At least nemesis managed to bring out deep hidden emotions in people, and there is nothing in Star Trek (2009) that was as moving as Data's sacrifice in Nemesis.
Nemesis is probably my personal greatest film of all time though as I love the TNG period so I maybe a bit biased, but what I do know is, just because a particular formula doesn't sell movie tickets to the general population doesn't mean that everyone hates it, which is why I personally prefer the majority of the old films to this latest one.