Where's the fun in PVP..

Obitus_ wrote:

A pvp ranking system or a table of the top cq earners would be great, that and a capture the monument would greatly improve pvp.

as would, a node in each neighbourhood which gives the org that owns it (info and hour, or bonuses to org abilities (if/when org abilities get added))

The day i see this ingame i think there be alot of renewed subscriptions.

gayal wrote:

I do PVP but its as much fun as in cr1.0.

Almost everyone seems to be duelist, smg speciliast, the combo of those two, and kung fu the rest of the classes you dont see often. In cr1.0 you had that the whole population was almost hacker and that was overpowerd, now almost everyone is those trees... i wonder.

  As I recall, far from everyone was a hacker.  Once you hit 50, you simply maxed VD and had a fairly good shot at beating up hackers.  In fact MKT was also an over popular tree - as it tended to *CENSORED* teh Hax0rs.  It was easier to break DR than VD though, which could be capped, whereas DR you could get to sort of 270+ and be immune.

  I have  question.  Why was VT and VD based on 400 when CT and RcT was based on 200?  To me it was the biggest flaw in the system, they should have based all the trees on a 200 basic attack.  Though actually, when I think about it, there WAS no CD.  It was all based off the same base CT (attack and defense in one) roll.  I would love to go back to the design stage and discuss why there was that variation.  The inability to ever have a higher VD than their VT was not, IMHO, a well thought out plan.  It should have worked like DR methinks.  Then hackers could have been outclassed by people who specifically took them out.  But of course when you screwed your own build to outclass hackers you would have been weak against builds that didn't take those precautions.  How it should be, IMO.