2 questions about coders and attributes

6 posts · 2006-05-09 17:39:49 to 2006-05-15 08:16:57

#35500000949 05/09/2006 17:39:49 2 questions about coders and attributes
Hi I play on Syntax. I am wanting to make a RSI on vector and I was wondering...

1: How are coders in a pvp enviroment?

2: For those who play Coders what attribute build do you like?

I am wanting to go down one of the Gunman trees and the Coder trees. Since its a different life style on a hostile server I would like to gather a few idea's before going. I was thinking of trying a Max VIT build with the rest into defence's.

#35500000950 05/09/2006 17:49:48 Re: 2 questions about coders and attributes
I use the coder tree as supplemental abilities. I have a few RSI's that are Hacker/Coder and a few that are Operative(MA/Guns) / Coder. I code things and sell them for $info with all my characters.

Sometimes when I'm phrag pharming I use the coder tree and code a proxy so it is not so lonely. As far as combat I havn't tried it much since the new combat system was implemented. Judging by what I see during PVP melees it still is not the most powerful combat tree.

#35500000953 05/10/2006 13:21:48 Re: 2 questions about coders and attributes


SumDumGai wrote:
1: How are coders in a pvp enviroment? 

Theyre not everyones first choice, thats for sure. But theres always one or two running around.

For me, in constantly active PvP, they're just not quick or easy.
#35500000955 05/11/2006 03:35:08 Re: 2 questions about coders and attributes
I use Coder, more specifically UtM, as my main PvP loadout over on
Syntax. It takes a good 30 seconds to et up however, so you may find it
easier to keep a MA/Duellist profile for coming out of hardlines.

#35500000962 05/12/2006 04:07:49 Re: 2 questions about coders and attributes
go utility master ....it pwnsSMILEY
#35500000976 05/15/2006 08:16:57 Re: 2 questions about coders and attributes
Yeah, UtM is growing in popularity on Vector.

Word of warning... Your Sim won't save you, it's just a weapon.

But you already know that, being a proxymaker already elsewhere...