10 posts · 2005-11-04 03:38:00 to 2006-03-27 18:37:00
Thank You Eyepopper. If nothing else democrats should agree with the normal people on that!!!
eyepopper wrote:
nothing says "the son of god" like santa claus.
ZippydaSquirl wrote:
my%25252Bman%25252Bblan wrote:
Also This country was founded by Christians for Christians and to Christians so coca-cola should stop trying to be politically correct and put a freakin Santa Claus on ur cans!!
I smell a skinhead.....
There are many types of Christians. I'm disapointed that Skinheads/NeoNazis are some of them. It doesn't go well with the rest of us. And what's all this nonsense about Santa Claus on Cocoa Cola? They use polar bears because they're cute and Santa doesn't go well with the other 3 seasons.
Message Edited by ZippydaSquirl on 12-04-2005 03:51 PM
hey, santa has been on coca cola products for as long as i can remember. ive even got coke christmas ornaments with santa on them. see?
I'm going to revive this thread, so I can get the forums noobs to take a look, and possibly state their opinion on this subject.
Recap the recent events too!
Okay, lets see, 7 months later, another war in Iraq anniversary has gone by (I didn't know if it should be called an anniversary in the first place), and more deaths than I can count. The news makes the war in Iraq so usual that its right along with the gas price averages for the day. One can compare this war to the one we fought in Vietnam, but obviously lost. Many soliders died, many civilians died, and we lost. Which is just what I'm thinking is going to happen to us this time around.
(Not saying abandon ship, just losing quite a lot of hope here.) But the same thing during both of those time, we have idiots for presidents. Knowing that Bush should of been impeached already, I now don't think there is a chance that it WILL happen, no matter what seemingly stupid decisions he does make.
Seeing how I have different views than Republicans on the topic of the war, (obviously that makes me a Democrat) I dont think we should have gone to war at all. But most (okay, some) Republicans now are saying that it wasn't worth it. (I do wonder if that should automatically make them Democrats lol) Now, changing this from the war topic to the re-building of the Gulf Coast....
I do know that he should be blamed for the slow response (and some of that has already been proven, even around 7 months later). Just think, if we are still re-building AFTER 7 months and the next hurricane season is just around the corner, then Bush best get to work on "plans of action" for when these next batch of hurricanes just happen to hit the Gulf Coast again and ruin even more lives. But I'm drifting off topic...
I'm done with this reply for the moment. *Coughs and walks away*
Before/during/after a major storm hits the Gulf Coast, those states such as Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana can't look to themselves for financial help to get their citizens back on their feet, for they are some of the poorest states in the country. So they would have no choice but to look to the federal government to help them out. But when the president doesn't act immediately and help out with stuff like financial issues, things like much needed supplies, food, and other necessities can be slowed down immensely.
Which therefore would re-create the hurricane relief situation last year.
Well, since I was in fact born in Biloxi, Mississippi, I would have no choice but to start talking about the southern part of politics. And plus, I'm only 16, so getting a job and stuff comes a lil later. (Off topic part of course)
And for some reason, I just went blank.
Continue discussing.
::sighs::
Ok, fine, I'll let it die.
It...it was just one of my most favorite threads due to the number of pages...
Okie...I now deem this thread USELESS!
Continue dying.