new sig

21 posts · 2005-08-19 16:25:13 to 2005-08-20 09:07:33

#12200000594 08/19/2005 16:26:07 Re: new sig
this isent new, you have posted this before.....and it's to large to be a sig.
#12200000602 08/19/2005 16:37:34 Re: new sig
and the point of this thread would be???

#12200000605 08/19/2005 16:41:35 Re: new sig
I can see it can turn into a huge flame, and the people that know him will make it even worse....(i dont flame often but this is just stupid SMILEY)
#12200000610 08/19/2005 18:08:06 Re: new sig
*GASP*

There is an entire forum section just for testing sigs !!!!!!!!

Its called the RSI section, use it.

#12200000611 08/19/2005 19:38:56 Re: new sig
now thats hot :O

#12200000614 08/19/2005 19:57:22 Re: new sig
Giveen, what's the point of using the xfire signature if you've disabled everything it does?
#12200000615 08/19/2005 19:58:57 Re: new sig


Peer 2.0 wrote:
Giveen, what's the point of using the xfire signature if you've disabled everything it does?

because i have no idea how to enable it SMILEY

how do i do it?
#12200000618 08/19/2005 20:06:37 Re: new sig
XFire -> Options -> Privacy


Those options there are what you want to re-enable.
#12200000627 08/19/2005 20:31:15 Re: new sig
Wrong forum

#12200000632 08/19/2005 21:05:43 Re: new sig
I would move this thread if I could, but I can't and this issue is here.
#12200000639 08/19/2005 21:48:07 Re: new sig
                                           (    (
                                               @@  ) ((
                                            (   @@  ( )) )
                                               ( @@@@@@)( (
     _______                                        @@@@() )
    <   ____)                                       @@@@(@@@@ (
 /--|  |(  o|                                        @@@@@(@@@@ )
|   >   \___|                                  )@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@((
|  /---------+                       @@)@@@(@@@)@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@(
| |    \ =========______/|@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@@@@)@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@) 
|  \   \\=========------\
|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@@@@)@@@@@(@@@@@)
|   \   \----+--\-)))
|   |\______|_)))/
 \__==========
    |   |-\   \         SWOOOSH!
    |   |  \   \        YOU GOT
    |   |   \   \       FLAMED!
    |   |   /   /
    |   |  /   /
    |   |_<   /
____<_____\\__\__ ___ _  _  _ ____  __ _ ___ _____ _

#12200000640 08/19/2005 21:53:37 Re: new sig
Ah cool, thanks for the help SMILEY

#12200000641 08/20/2005 01:36:20 Re: new sig


Peer 2.0 wrote:
I would move this thread if I could, but I can't and this issue is here.


It should be locked, this makes 2 of the exact same threads, he started on a few days ago and got the flame there...hint?
#12200000650 08/20/2005 04:40:52 Re: new sig


Chanulus wrote:
                                           (    (
                                              
@@  ) ((
                                            (   @@  ( )) )
                                               ( @@@@@@)( (
     _______                                       
@@@@() )
    <   ____)                                      
@@@@(@@@@ (
 /--|  |(  o|                                       
@@@@@(@@@@ )
|   >   \___|                                 
)@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@((
|  /---------+                      
@@)@@@(@@@)@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@(
| |    \ =========______/|@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@@@@)@@@@@(@@@)@@@@@) 
|  \   \\=========------\
|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@@@@)@@@@@(@@@@@)
|   \   \----+--\-)))
|   |\______|_)))/
 \__==========
    |   |-\   \         SWOOOSH!
    |   |  \   \        YOU GOT
    |   |   \   \       FLAMED!
    |   |   /   /
    |   |  /   /
    |   |_<   /
____<_____\\__\__ ___ _  _  _ ____  __ _ ___ _____ _


That's cool :smileyhappy:
#12200000653 08/20/2005 04:48:39 Re: new sig
*CENSORED* LOSERS and i didnt already post this ! dumbasses shutup if u have nothiong worth while to say then *CENSORED* **CENSORED**
#12200000656 08/20/2005 05:26:10 Re: new sig


sgtclunk wrote:
*CENSORED* LOSERS and i didnt already post this ! dumbasses shutup if u have nothiong worth while to say then *CENSORED* **CENSORED**

Way to over react SMILEY
#12200000657 08/20/2005 05:39:35 Re: new sig


Globin wrote:


sgtclunk wrote:
*CENSORED* LOSERS and i didnt already post this ! dumbasses shutup if u have nothiong worth while to say then *CENSORED* **CENSORED**

Way to over react SMILEY


way for him to get reported SMILEY
#12200000658 08/20/2005 05:46:43 Re: new sig


Giveen wrote:


Globin wrote:


sgtclunk wrote:
*CENSORED* LOSERS and i didnt already post this ! dumbasses shutup if u have nothiong worth while to say then *CENSORED* **CENSORED**

Way to over react SMILEY


way for him to get reported SMILEY


Pwnd
#12200000666 08/20/2005 08:36:20 Re: new sig


sgtclunk wrote:
*CENSORED* LOSERS and i didnt already post this ! dumbasses shutup if u have nothiong worth while to say then *CENSORED* **CENSORED**


you misspelled noting....it's not nothiong O_O....ya SMILEY
#12200000667 08/20/2005 09:07:33 Re: new sig
OMG I forgot my h O_O....nothing....not noting....and not nothiong