New Cinematic *Spoilers*

2 posts · 2006-01-20 09:31:00 to 2006-01-20 12:25:00

#10400072877 01/20/2006 09:31 Re: New Cinematic *Spoilers*


Phybersyko wrote:


Yahweh wrote:
I really got the impression that we should have seen this before the last set of criticals.  It seemed to pick up where 3.3 left off and reaffirmed information that we had already found out during those same criticals.  Was this meant to be a flashback?



Doubt it was meant to be a flashback, just seems like poor timing/delivery. It should have been part of the last cinematic -- we already know this information. On the surface it's just eye candy -- I wonder if there is something else we should be looking for?



It looks like the cinematic that was originally developed got split into two pieces.  And the newspaper flashback was an awkward attempt to disguise what would have been an otherwise abrupt start to the second piece.  If true, this implies that they are slowing the progression of the story line.
#10400072948 01/20/2006 12:25 Re: New Cinematic *Spoilers*


skyscream wrote:

I competely agree. It was very .. rough. Awkward and sudden cuts.

P.S. I really need to make you a sig 2. lol. I know you never post, but still.. lol.



It's been a really slow day at work :smileywink:

/resumelurking