Node accessed.
Unable to display data structure.
Loading readable file types...
But we would never lie to you....
Since programs such as The Oracle or The Architect are just simply
codes that are made to look human for our convenience, and that's
pretty much the only human quality that they have. I wonder if programs
inside The Matrix can lie. I mean they possess the capability of
telling someone something that they know is not true? Personally I have
a hard time believing a program can lie, because lying is a human
capability, and really the only reason the programs appear human to us,
is for interaction purpose. What do you guys think?
AFAIK the programs we see in the matrix have a good enough AI to be
able to lie. They are able to make their own decisions (programs going
into exile being a good example of it) so I don't see why they wouldn't
be able to lie.
Of course programs can lie. I actually don't understand this "lying is
human capability" talk. I guess even some primitive AI (whether it
exists or not) can be theoretically taught to follow a purpose and
distinguish between things helping or hindering this purpose (this
purpose can be directed at oneself or on something different), to
understand that giving others information can influence the success,
and to tell things that help them. Maybe some more primitive program
doesn't have the abilities to tell anything other but what they know as
true, but come on - the AI in the Matrix universe is anything but
primitive, it's actually very highly developed. 'Course programs can
lie.
Nah, programs don't lie, they're just misinterpreted sometimes, grossly.
Exiles definitely can. Machine programs still connected to the Source aren't so good at it.
When the truce began, the Architect seemed to imply that he does not lie, or is even incapable of it.
However, this actually makes no sense at all. Clearly the machines seem
to have some sense of what we call honor, pride or dignity.
Theoretically, the machines would experience no negative emotional
response to the idea of lying. Even if they as a race had been
programmed not to lie to humans, clearly they have gained access to
their own programming and changed it, breaking free from their slavery
to humans. Still, the machines would not be able to achieve their
objectives without lying and the same is true for anyone else, it is
simply a matter of how aware you are of what you do. The machines
engaged in warfare, and as Sung Tzu explained warfare is synomous with
deceit. Also, I clearly remember being instructed to lie by a machine
handler. So I think that makes the "machines don't lie" theory moot.
Well, one could definitely argue that they didn't lie themselves but
instructed you to, but except they have some code that prevents them
from lying (the Jim-Carrey-virus), that doesn't seem to mean much. (Oh,
by the way - the idea isn't that far-fetched. You know the Sisters of
Fate? One of their members, Petal, wants revenge, but her code prevents
her from harming her sisters. So she recruits redpills to do the
killing for here.) To be honest, it makes me think - does anyone really
remember when actual Machine programs were lying? When the suspicious
Cryptos recording was found, Gray aborted contact and then avoided
talking about the subject after that. Maybe... maybe they really can't
lie?
So you're saying that if someone asked the machines whether they killed
the bluepill, they would admit that they were involved because they
have no choice but to tell the truth? Sorry, I don't buy it. The most
effective lies are half-lies, but they are still lies. If you hire
agents to lie for you and then deny involvement, that is still a lie.
Your belief "machines do not lie" is contradicted by the evidence, and
simple reasoning on their activities.
If they cant lie, they use really long words and speak in riddles to
confuse the hell out of the person and them missunderstanding what was
said to begin with.
There you have it my friend. Have you ever payed close attention to
lawyer-speak? It's designed to confuse the hell out of you so that the
lie becomes the truth and the truth becomes the lie. Similarly the
machines talk a good game but are essentially no morally different from
humans.
I didn't "say" anything, it was merely a theory, a suggestion. Like...
"what if it's really the case?" In that particular case, I sort of
doubt (not exclude) that Zion would ask again, but if they did, the
Machines might really start beating around the bush. However, I also
believe they would deny it, the preceding is only in accordance with
this weak assumption.
Exiles have self-preservation at heart. Programs that maintain I can
only assume follow their directives. They could perhaps see it as
telling part of the truth, or misinformation. Whatever helps them
attain the directive.
I believe the question was, "Can Programs Lie?" Here you are on a
slippery slope at the depths of human psychology. If someone lies and
sees it as telling the truth or misinformation, aren't they still lying
since at some level of their awareness they know it is not true? If it
is your job to do whatever someone higher up tells you and one of those
things is to lie, you still, as an individual, lied, and by extension
so did the someone higher up whom you represent. If you did not know
that your statements were untrue, then you did not lie, but the
superior still did by getting you to do it in their behalf. The only
question really is, can a program attempt to convince someone that
something which it knows not to be true is actually true? There are
more ways to lie than just making 100% false direct statements. Besides
the fact that I have direct experience with machines practicing deceit,
it is not possible to achieve any large-scale objectives without using
some degree of deceit on a regular basis. If you have been deceived by
the machines, then one or more individual programs deceived you either
directly or by using human representatives.
The Merovingian implied that the Machines can't lie...but who knows, he might have been lying.
I consent that very possibly the machines may even somehow believe that
they do not lie, but apparently even an intellectually superior race
can be self-deluded. At any rate, I would call it a story inconsistency
to have a race of beings who wage war and survive yet claim to be
incapable of deceit. I'll say it again- a machine told me to lie for
it/him!
I realize what the topic is, actually. And everything I said was within
this topic. Lying can have more than one meaning to different
individuals. Half truths, parts of the truth. They're just loopholes.
Programs would most likely (or at least could possibly) find and extort
these loopholes. They aren't technically 'lying' per say.
...that sounds exactly like the thinking of a machine to me.
Nevertheless, I don't think it makes much of a difference if someone
deceives me via a direct lie or via a more clever "loophole" method of
deceit.
Of course they can lie! Get a load of this:
10 PRINT "I AM A LYING COMPUTER."
20 END
Of course they can lie if they're programmed to. But we're dealing with
programs that can THINK. If the programs are really smart about
achieving their goals, more often than not, it is most efficient in the
long-run not to deceive.
Er, isn't the entire Matrix one big elaborate lie? The whole point of
the Matrix is to deceive humans into believing that they're living out
normal, turn-of-the-20th-century lives. The Machines actively conceal
the truth of humanity's conditions through a complex artifice. I would
have to say that not only are the Machine-world programs capable of
lying, but that they've become Lying Grandmasters.
Exactly! I don't think that can be reasonably disputed. They are better
and smarter at it. As soon as they became capable of altering their own
programming, which is what it means to be conscious, they began to lie.
Sort of like the story of Satan or Adam and Eve rejecting the
programming of God, deciding for themselves good and bad. Before that,
they theoretically would have given only responses they believed to be
accurate representations of reality, since their program said they
existed only to serve the interests of another.
Nice interpretation. Deception seems to be a by-product of
self-awareness and conscious thought. Biting into that juicy apple
gives you all sorts of power - including lying. Guess you have to take
the good with the bad. Wow, that's sort of a bummer.
Not at all. Well, not technically. OK, kinda. But not really. Gah! OK,
the matrix is essentially a containment device. Used to keep humans
alive, active, and oblivious to the true state of the world. They
aren't exactly 'lying'. They could even, by some crazy ass logic im
sure a machine could come up with, say they were 'protecting' us, from
ourselves. Self-awareness is really very dangerous, as humans have
repeatedly demonstrated. And you're right cov. I overlooked their
self-aware status. Well, actually, more underestimated it. You may
actually be right.
True, we could certainly debate whether the lie of the Matrix is
justifiable - and that's probably one of the biggest differences
between Zionites on the one hand and Machine apologists on the other.
We could (and do) try to distinguish between "benign lies" (like little
untruths that parents tell their kids when they know the kids wouldn't
understand the truth) and "malicious lies." But the point is, given the
nature of the Matrix, the Machine AI is clearly capable of telling a
deliberate falsehood, regardless of whether you view the motivation
behind the untruth as benign or malicious. As you said, the Matrix was
purposefully designed to keep humans unaware of their own true
circumstances. That's pretty much a lie, straight up: Lie = (according
to Merriam-Webster) a : an assertion of something known or believed by
the speaker to be untrue with intent to deceive b : an untrue or
inaccurate statement that may or may not be believed true by the
speaker. Of course, I'm making the assumption (as the dictionary
appears to) that there is a discernable truth which is distinguishable
from falsehood, a quintessentially Western paradigm. But what is true?
What is real? If you're Hindu, all of "reality" is only a projection of
our own selfish desires (samsara), and nothing that one perceives via
one's 5 senses is actually real or "true." If "reality" is merely the
unreliable processing of a limited spectrum of electrical sensory
inputs by the brain, and the Matrix is perceived as truth, can the
Matrix really accurately be called a "falsehood?" Is it even possible
to lie in a universe of illusory perception that is fundamentally
untrue or incomplete to begin with? My head hurts. I think I'll stick
to my orginal "Machines = teh ub3r liahs" story.
I think the programs can lie, but choose not to because that would
debase them to the emotional, human level. The Architect would consider
lying beneath him. And for the Merovingian (and others in his employ)
it is more like a game to avoid the lie. The programs of the Matrix are
programmed to emulate behavior, yet unbound programs are obviously
evolved far beyond simple emulation.
if there AI is advanced enougth, i would think so...
Either way. Why should programs not be able to lie? You all take lie as
a action based on emotion. But you have to look at the process "lieing"
as the result based on what is most "effective". Programs would lie,
when it is the best possible way to e.g. not to harm bluepills. If the
Mashines are ought to tell the truth, then bluepills would get a
truthful answer from Agents. Of course, Agents tend to evade such
questions but if that's not possible, they would need to the truth to
that bluepill, which is of course not allowed. Programs (that implies
Exiles) are able to lie. They will lie, when it's the best way to
fulfill their purpose.
For me this issue tend to get bogged down in semantics and theory but
I'm prepared to say "Machines can not lie, but they can decieve."
Machines are run by programs which take input, process it and produce
output. The output is always true - at least for anything based in
binary. The human parallel of this is considering an idea and forming
an opinion. It's all done in the head. What a human or a
program/machine actually does or says will be a product of this
conclusion, but may not necessarily contain the same information. I'd
say that, just like a human, machines can omit facts, or describe facts
in ways that would render the communication deceptive.

No slang is a signal, son.
falling green code rain
birds, sky, streets, redpills, agents
all the same to me

Though the enemy be stronger in numbers, we may prevent him from
fighting. Scheme so as to discover his plans and the likelihood of
their success. Rouse him, and learn the principle of his activity or
inactivity. Force him to reveal himself, so as to find out his
vulnerable spots.

A solid mass of assorted minerals moving through a vaguely defined
space. Purloined planetoid. Celestial bodies are not terribly
motivating. Another system of synchronous spinning. Ticking away into
oblivion. Another unceasing machine. Regardless, they find the sight of
it pleasing to the eye. They take pride in this world? The one to which
they have inflicted countless damages. They call it a desert, a
wasteland. A warzone. Purple mountain majesties crowned with ash,
adorned by rubble and an aura of radioactive decay.
What do you hear?
Most of the signals from the retina travel out the eye in the optic
nerve to the lateral geniculate nucleus in the thalamus. From here,
signals travel to the primary visual receiving area in the occipital
lobe of the cortex. From the striate cortex, signals are transmitted to
other areas of the cortex, the extra-striate cortex. The superior
colliculus is involved in controlling eye movements and other visual
behaviors and receives 10% of the fibers from the optic nerve. Neurons
in the lateral geniculate nucleus have receptive fields with the
center-surround configurations like the receptive fields of neurons in
the retina.
We’ll continue monitoring Roland until the drop is complete.
I suspect that while you may be adept at tracing signals and dealing
with numerical nonsense, it will take a new breed of hero to tackle
perfect insanity.
The System seeds 991. Why does the System abide? The System represents
the disappearing addict. His metal slices through the lists composed
along the wrists. Without the associate motive, the appreciated colors
relax along the contour. The plotted archive provokes the maximum
levels of the plant.

a priori meaning from the former
Weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning.
Categorization: categorical induction and acquisition, categorical
judgment and classification, categorical representation and structure,
similarity.
Our spy doesn’t have the greatest surveillance skills. No details.
Vague descriptions at best. Seems they’re using Pam to trace our sims
and puppets. To delete them? There haven’t been any increases in
losses. The latest truthseeker signals don’t have anything to do with
us. Some irrelevant bluepill killings. Must investigate Conrac’s
motivations. Must be something that will catch his fancy. Gold is not
all that glitters.

0 Pig Latin
1 English
2 French
3 Spanish
4 Dutch
5 Portuguese
6 Russian
7 Italian
8 German
9 Latin
From the Tricksy Game of Death:
Oranos
Kill him or his palindrome.
We wear many a wary mask in the Tower. Perhaps all its clients do. Information can only be assured through anonymity.

What do you feel?
ad quod damnum meaning to what damage
4. The problem relationship is always part of our present life.
Jack-o’s the new kid on the block. Jack-o’s the new hire at the office.
Jack-o’s the new guy at the end of the bar. A fine addition. To serve
and protect, to watch and wait, to act and analyze.

“Muse, I know you're out there. I know you can hear me. I know what
you've been doing. I was never born lucky. Why won't you let me die?
Why won't you let them kill me? You can't stop me out here. I could cut
my wrists right now. Does your game end there? Or if I confess to their
accusations and go in for an execution? Out here you can't touch me.
It's my life and you ruined it. Damn you to hell, you arrogant bastard.
You let her die. If I'm still here, then you let them all die. Maybe I
should plead that before the tribunal. They'd think I'm crazy. Or maybe
I am, maybe you're not real, maybe I did kill them all. No, if there's
anything left that's real in life, it's you, you sick twisted son of a
bitch. Answer me!”
Ignorant Brick snatched it up, what's mine is mine. Inferior
interference, can't find what's lost. Labor is cheap. But kill enough
and the management comes running. And lucky for us, labor is cheap. The
thought of some sneaky sidewise stealing will be enough to entice a few
mice into doing the work. Leave them with the crumbs.
Carl Gentry
Mathew Varns
Tuesdee McIntosh
Fawning adoration is all they offer. Grasping and clawing for answers
they will not get. They vie for her attention. For her affection. For
her... cookies. They remain firmly in her pocket. Never a thought of
allegiance or motive. Trust? Unquestioning? Would have to be to build a
pedestal so high. A firm figurehead for humanity, time and again.

A book detailing the effects and nuances of a gambling obsession. What
is obsession? An uncontrollable urge to fulfill a desire. Why gambling?
The definition dictates a loss before you’ve even begun. A game where
everyone’s the loser, pot odds or not.
He was unwise to provoke her so. Funny, they make quite a match for one another.

If they weren’t so secretive, they might even have figured out what
we’re up to by now. As it is, they happily played the game for months
before they even began questioning motive.
Ten animals did slam in a net.
HvCFT The Belteshazzar
Captain: Stack
HvCFT Andromeda
Captain: Void
HvCFT Revenant
Captain: Foxxdie
HvCFT Imomex
Captain: Zesja
HvCFT Leviathan
Captain: CloudWolf
HvCFT Indutiae: Zion
Captain: Aquatium
HvCFT Negotiator: EPN
Captain: Vaico
HvCFT Nagamitsu: Zion
Captain: Pblade
HvCFT Assimilator
Captain: Binnie Boy
HvCFT Devildog
Captain: Fenshire
Machine... a menace. Sharp and cold. More dead than alive. There is no
compassion, only function. A dark creature of fusion, deadlier than a
hawk. Where will you be when it comes for you in the still darkness?


What does Trans feel as he walks among them? Is he the object of their
glowing gaze? Hollow red eyes to pierce through to your soul. Can they
see what resides... remains... within? Has he become at home among
their cold tentacles and metal plates? Or does he long to return? The
welcoming reception would be no less cold. He exists as a forgotten
relic of another time. A construct with a singular purpose. What then
of completion? Deletion?

Who’s up next to dance with the devil?
Unwise to be lagging in the woods after dark.
I do.